[PATCH v2] ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in rk_spdif_runtime_resume()

[PATCH v2] ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in rk_spdif_runtime_resume()

[Wang Jingjin]

rk_spdif_runtime_resume() may have called clk_prepare_enable() before return
from failed branches, add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in this case.

Fixes: f874b80e1571 ("ASoC: rockchip: Add rockchip SPDIF transceiver driver")
Signed-off-by: Wang Jingjin <wangjingjin1@huawei.com>
---
changes in v2:
- Match the subject to the content
---
 sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_spdif.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_spdif.c b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_spdif.c
index 8bef572d3cbc..5b4f00457587 100644
--- a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_spdif.c
+++ b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_spdif.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rk_spdif_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)

 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(spdif->hclk);
 	if (ret) {
+		clk_disable_unprepare(spdif->mclk);
 		dev_err(spdif->dev, "hclk clock enable failed %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
--
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in rk_spdif_runtime_resume()

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:39:00 +0800, Wang Jingjin wrote:
> rk_spdif_runtime_resume() may have called clk_prepare_enable() before return
> from failed branches, add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in this case.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in rk_spdif_runtime_resume()
      commit: 6d94d0090527b1763872275a7ccd44df7219b31e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark