[PATCH net-next v3] net: lan966x: Use automatic selection of VCAP rule actionset

[PATCH net-next v3] net: lan966x: Use automatic selection of VCAP rule actionset

[Horatiu Vultur]

Since commit 81e164c4aec5 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Add automatic
selection of VCAP rule actionset") the VCAP API has the capability to
select automatically the actionset based on the actions that are attached
to the rule. So it is not needed anymore to hardcode the actionset in the
driver, therefore it is OK to remove this.

Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
v2->v3:
- fix typo hardcore -> hardcode
- remove vcap_set_rule_set_actionset also for PTP rules
v1->v2:
- improve the commit message by mentioning the commit which allows
  to make this change
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c       | 3 +--
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c | 2 --
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c
index a8348437dd87f..ded9ab79ccc21 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c
@@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ static int lan966x_ptp_add_trap(struct lan966x_port *port,
 	if (err)
 		goto free_rule;
 
-	err = vcap_set_rule_set_actionset(vrule, VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE);
-	err |= vcap_rule_add_action_bit(vrule, VCAP_AF_CPU_COPY_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1);
+	err = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(vrule, VCAP_AF_CPU_COPY_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1);
 	err |= vcap_rule_add_action_u32(vrule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, LAN966X_PMM_REPLACE);
 	err |= vcap_val_rule(vrule, proto);
 	if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
index bd10a71897418..f960727ecaeec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
@@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ static int lan966x_tc_flower_add(struct lan966x_port *port,
 							0);
 			err |= vcap_rule_add_action_u32(vrule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE,
 							LAN966X_PMM_REPLACE);
-			err |= vcap_set_rule_set_actionset(vrule,
-							   VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE);
 			if (err)
 				goto out;
 
-- 
2.38.0

Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: lan966x: Use automatic selection of VCAP rule actionset

[Alexander Lobakin]

From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:28:31 +0100

> Since commit 81e164c4aec5 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Add automatic
> selection of VCAP rule actionset") the VCAP API has the capability to
> select automatically the actionset based on the actions that are attached
> to the rule. So it is not needed anymore to hardcode the actionset in the
> driver, therefore it is OK to remove this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> - fix typo hardcore -> hardcode

:D

Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

> - remove vcap_set_rule_set_actionset also for PTP rules
> v1->v2:
> - improve the commit message by mentioning the commit which allows
>   to make this change
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c       | 3 +--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c
> index a8348437dd87f..ded9ab79ccc21 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c
> @@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ static int lan966x_ptp_add_trap(struct lan966x_port *port,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto free_rule;
>  
> -	err = vcap_set_rule_set_actionset(vrule, VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE);
> -	err |= vcap_rule_add_action_bit(vrule, VCAP_AF_CPU_COPY_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1);
> +	err = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(vrule, VCAP_AF_CPU_COPY_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1);
>  	err |= vcap_rule_add_action_u32(vrule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, LAN966X_PMM_REPLACE);
>  	err |= vcap_val_rule(vrule, proto);
>  	if (err)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> index bd10a71897418..f960727ecaeec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ static int lan966x_tc_flower_add(struct lan966x_port *port,
>  							0);
>  			err |= vcap_rule_add_action_u32(vrule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE,
>  							LAN966X_PMM_REPLACE);
> -			err |= vcap_set_rule_set_actionset(vrule,
> -							   VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE);
>  			if (err)
>  				goto out;
>  

Thanks,
Olek

Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: lan966x: Use automatic selection of VCAP rule actionset

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:

On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:28:31 +0100 you wrote:
> Since commit 81e164c4aec5 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Add automatic
> selection of VCAP rule actionset") the VCAP API has the capability to
> select automatically the actionset based on the actions that are attached
> to the rule. So it is not needed anymore to hardcode the actionset in the
> driver, therefore it is OK to remove this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v3] net: lan966x: Use automatic selection of VCAP rule actionset
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4d3e050b5488

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html