mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@metla.fi>,
	Willem Riede <osst@riede.org>,
	coda@cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Cleanup file_count usage
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:31:54 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16794.32730.184008.344036@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041116135200.GA23257@impedimenta.in.ibm.com>

Ravikiran G Thirumalai writes:

> 2. Read to f_count at drivers/net/ppp_generic.c:
>    The PPPIOCDETACH ioctl is failed if the device fd is duped and
>    being polled by another process -- which is determined by a read
>    to f_count.  The comments in the code indicate that the PPPIOCDETACH 
>    ioctl should be junked and userland can use a workaround
>    by closing the fd and reopening /dev/ppp.  I can make a patch to junk
>    PPPIOCDETACH, but is it okay to break binary compatibility? Paul?

I would very much rather not break binary compatibility.  People using
ppp-2.4.2 or ppp-2.4.3 won't be affected by this change, but ppp-2.4.2
was released in January this year and I wouldn't be surprised if
some people are still using ppp-2.4.1 (or even ppp-2.4.0), which would
be affected.

I suggest that as a temporary compromise, we keep PPPIOCDETACH but
make it zero file->private_data without freeing the ppp structure that
it points to.  That will cause a memory leak but will avoid the
possibility of using that memory after it is freed (in the case where
the descriptor has been dup'd and another process is doing a poll on
it).

We should make the kernel whinge loudly when anyone uses PPPIOCDETACH,
too.  If/when 2.7.0 comes along we can remove it.

Paul.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-16 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-16 13:52 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-11-16 13:57 ` [patch 1/4] Cleanup file_count usage: Bad usage at some .open, .release Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-11-16 14:03 ` [patch 2/4] Cleanup file_count usage: Error/debug messages on f_count reads Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-11-16 14:06 ` [patch 3/4] Cleanup file_count usage: Redundant check based on file_count Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-11-16 14:11 ` [patch 4/4] Cleanup file_count usage: Avoid file_count usage for hugetlb nattach reporting Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-11-16 14:24   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-16 22:31 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2004-11-17 16:50   ` [patch 0/4] Cleanup file_count usage Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-11-17 22:07     ` Paul Mackerras
2004-12-01  6:30       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-11-16 22:56 ` Jan Harkes
2004-11-16 23:19   ` Jan Harkes
2004-11-17  0:57 ` Willem Riede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16794.32730.184008.344036@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=Kai.Makisara@metla.fi \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=coda@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=kiran@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osst@riede.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®