mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/fpsimd: Only provide the length to cpufeature for xCR registers
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:44:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169165967155.2189311.11595342536402277516.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731-arm64-sme-fa64-hotplug-v2-1-7714c00dd902@kernel.org>

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:58:48 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> For both SVE and SME we abuse the generic register field comparison
> support in the cpufeature code as part of our detection of unsupported
> variations in the vector lengths available to PEs, reporting the maximum
> vector lengths via ZCR_EL1.LEN and SMCR_EL1.LEN.  Since these are
> configuration registers rather than identification registers the
> assumptions the cpufeature code makes about how unknown bitfields behave
> are invalid, leading to warnings when SME features like FA64 are enabled
> and we hotplug a CPU:
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/cpufeature), thanks!

[1/1] arm64/fpsimd: Only provide the length to cpufeature for xCR registers
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/01948b09edc3

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-11 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-31 13:58 Mark Brown
2023-08-03 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-08-03 17:44   ` Mark Brown
2023-08-04 16:20     ` Catalin Marinas
2023-08-04 16:37       ` Mark Brown
2023-08-09 16:11         ` Catalin Marinas
2023-08-11 11:44 ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169165967155.2189311.11595342536402277516.b4-ty@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®