From: "tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/bugs] x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:19:31 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169295877160.27769.14262638853493570689.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca76a2e94217d6fc8e007d2ca79fee219f3168f8.1692919072.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/bugs branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 4f643529501794ef9baabfe65612da8a2a8eff5b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4f643529501794ef9baabfe65612da8a2a8eff5b
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:01:43 -07:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:22:00 +02:00
x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization
The following commit:
095b8303f383 ("x86/alternative: Make custom return thunk unconditional")
made '__x86_return_thunk' a placeholder value. All code setting
X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK also changes the value of 'x86_return_thunk'. So
the optimization at the beginning of apply_returns() is dead code.
Also, before the above-mentioned commit, the optimization actually had a
bug It bypassed __static_call_fixup(), causing some raw returns to
remain unpatched in static call trampolines. Thus the 'Fixes' tag.
Fixes: d2408e043e72 ("x86/alternative: Optimize returns patching")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ca76a2e94217d6fc8e007d2ca79fee219f3168f8.1692919072.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 099d58d..34be5fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -720,14 +720,6 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_returns(s32 *start, s32 *end)
{
s32 *s;
- /*
- * Do not patch out the default return thunks if those needed are the
- * ones generated by the compiler.
- */
- if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK) &&
- (x86_return_thunk == __x86_return_thunk))
- return;
-
for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
void *dest = NULL, *addr = (void *)s + *s;
struct insn insn;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 7:01 [PATCH v2 00/23] SRSO fixes/cleanups Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 01/23] x86/srso: Fix srso_show_state() side effect Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 02/23] x86/srso: Set CPUID feature bits independently of bug or mitigation status Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 03/23] x86/srso: Don't probe microcode in a guest Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 04/23] KVM: x86: Add IBPB_BRTYPE support Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 18:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-26 15:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 05/23] KVM: x86: Add SBPB support Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 18:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 06/23] x86/srso: Fix SBPB enablement for spec_rstack_overflow=off Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 07/23] x86/srso: Fix SBPB enablement for (possible) future fixed HW Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 08/23] x86/srso: Print actual mitigation if requested mitigation isn't possible Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 09/23] x86/srso: Print mitigation for retbleed IBPB case Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 10/23] x86/srso: Fix vulnerability reporting for missing microcode Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-01 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-02 10:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-02 17:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-03 14:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-05 4:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 11/23] x86/srso: Fix unret validation dependencies Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 12/23] x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-08-25 10:19 ` tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2023-08-25 10:27 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 13/23] x86/srso: Improve i-cache locality for alias mitigation Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 14/23] x86/srso: Unexport untraining functions Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 15/23] x86/srso: Remove 'pred_cmd' label Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 19:51 ` [PATCH 15/23] " Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-26 15:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 16/23] x86/bugs: Remove default case for fully switched enums Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-02 9:02 ` [PATCH 16/23] " Borislav Petkov
2023-09-05 5:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 17/23] x86/srso: Move retbleed IBPB check into existing 'has_microcode' code block Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 18/23] x86/srso: Remove redundant X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB check Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-02 9:10 ` [PATCH 18/23] " Borislav Petkov
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 19/23] x86/srso: Disentangle rethunk-dependent options Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 20/23] x86/rethunk: Use SYM_CODE_START[_LOCAL]_NOALIGN macros Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 21/23] x86/retpoline: Remove .text..__x86.return_thunk section Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 22/23] x86/nospec: Refactor UNTRAIN_RET[_*] Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 18:22 ` [PATCH 22/23] " Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-26 15:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 23/23] x86/calldepth: Rename __x86_return_skl() to call_depth_return_thunk() Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] SRSO fixes/cleanups Ingo Molnar
2023-08-26 15:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-26 17:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-05 1:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-05 5:04 [PATCH v3 10/20] x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-05 10:09 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-19 9:53 ` tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=169295877160.27769.14262638853493570689.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®