From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
David.Kaplan@amd.com, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/23] x86/srso: Remove 'pred_cmd' label
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 22:51:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef77446f-0b9b-ea5e-61b4-da6b747f9892@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec18b04787fc21874303f29746a49847751eddd6.1692919072.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>
On 25.08.23 г. 10:01 ч., Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> SBPB is only enabled in two distinct cases:
>
> 1) when SRSO has been disabled with srso=off
>
> 2) when SRSO has been fixed (in future HW)
>
> Simplify the control flow by getting rid of the 'pred_cmd' label and
> moving the SBPB enablement check to the two corresponding code sites.
> This makes it more clear when exactly SBPB gets enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
I think it never was explained why SBPB should be used when SRSO is
off/hw is not affected? There's nothing in AMD's whitepape and there's
nothing in the original patch introducing SRSO_NO. This patch deals with
the "when", but what about the "Why" ? Can you put this in the changelog
(if I'm the only one missing this detail)?
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index d883d1c38f7f..3c7f634b6148 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -2410,13 +2410,21 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
> {
> bool has_microcode = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE);
>
> - if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) || cpu_mitigations_off())
> - goto pred_cmd;
> + if (cpu_mitigations_off())
> + return;
> +
> + if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO)) {
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
> + x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (has_microcode) {
> /*
> * Zen1/2 with SMT off aren't vulnerable after the right
> * IBPB microcode has been applied.
> + *
> + * Zen1/2 don't have SBPB, no need to try to enable it here.
> */
> if (boot_cpu_data.x86 < 0x19 && !cpu_smt_possible()) {
> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_NO);
> @@ -2439,7 +2447,9 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
>
> switch (srso_cmd) {
> case SRSO_CMD_OFF:
> - goto pred_cmd;
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
> + x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
> + return;
>
> case SRSO_CMD_MICROCODE:
> if (has_microcode) {
> @@ -2501,11 +2511,6 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
>
> out:
> pr_info("%s%s\n", srso_strings[srso_mitigation], has_microcode ? "" : ", no microcode");
> -
> -pred_cmd:
> - if ((!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) || srso_cmd == SRSO_CMD_OFF) &&
> - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
> - x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
> }
>
> #undef pr_fmt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 7:01 [PATCH v2 00/23] SRSO fixes/cleanups Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 01/23] x86/srso: Fix srso_show_state() side effect Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 02/23] x86/srso: Set CPUID feature bits independently of bug or mitigation status Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 03/23] x86/srso: Don't probe microcode in a guest Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 04/23] KVM: x86: Add IBPB_BRTYPE support Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 18:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-26 15:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 05/23] KVM: x86: Add SBPB support Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 18:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 06/23] x86/srso: Fix SBPB enablement for spec_rstack_overflow=off Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 07/23] x86/srso: Fix SBPB enablement for (possible) future fixed HW Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 08/23] x86/srso: Print actual mitigation if requested mitigation isn't possible Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 09/23] x86/srso: Print mitigation for retbleed IBPB case Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 10/23] x86/srso: Fix vulnerability reporting for missing microcode Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-01 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-02 10:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-02 17:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-03 14:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-05 4:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 11/23] x86/srso: Fix unret validation dependencies Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 12/23] x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimization Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:27 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 13/23] x86/srso: Improve i-cache locality for alias mitigation Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 14/23] x86/srso: Unexport untraining functions Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 15/23] x86/srso: Remove 'pred_cmd' label Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 19:51 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2023-08-26 15:45 ` [PATCH 15/23] " Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 16/23] x86/bugs: Remove default case for fully switched enums Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-02 9:02 ` [PATCH 16/23] " Borislav Petkov
2023-09-05 5:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 17/23] x86/srso: Move retbleed IBPB check into existing 'has_microcode' code block Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 18/23] x86/srso: Remove redundant X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB check Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-02 9:10 ` [PATCH 18/23] " Borislav Petkov
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 19/23] x86/srso: Disentangle rethunk-dependent options Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 20/23] x86/rethunk: Use SYM_CODE_START[_LOCAL]_NOALIGN macros Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 21/23] x86/retpoline: Remove .text..__x86.return_thunk section Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 22/23] x86/nospec: Refactor UNTRAIN_RET[_*] Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 18:22 ` [PATCH 22/23] " Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-26 15:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 7:01 ` [PATCH 23/23] x86/calldepth: Rename __x86_return_skl() to call_depth_return_thunk() Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:19 ` [tip: x86/bugs] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-25 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] SRSO fixes/cleanups Ingo Molnar
2023-08-26 15:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-26 17:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-05 1:29 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef77446f-0b9b-ea5e-61b4-da6b747f9892@suse.com \
--to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®