Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add ROHM BU64754 bindings

[Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>]

Quoting Conor Dooley (2023-09-15 22:13:40)
> Yo,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:59:45PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > Add YAML device tree bindings for the ROHM BU64754 VCM Motor Driver for
> > Camera Autofocus.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/media/i2c/rohm,bu64754.yaml      | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  7 +++
> >  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/rohm,bu64754.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/rohm,bu64754.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/rohm,bu64754.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..22da4a46bb0c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/rohm,bu64754.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +# Copyright (C) 2023 Ideas on Board Oy.
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/rohm,bu64754.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: ROHM BU64754 Actuator Driver for Camera Autofocus
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
> > +
> > +description: |
> 
> That | is surplus to requirements since you have no formatting to
> preserve.
> 
> > +  The BU64754 is an actuator driver IC which can control the actuator
> > +  position precisely using an internal Hall Sensor.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    items:
> > +      - enum:
> > +          - rohm,bu64754
> 
> Why such a complicated pattern when you only have one item here?
> Why not just const: rohm,bu64754?

These devices are really simple. I'd expect other versions/variants to
be able to be covered by the same driver in the future, but I can remove
this for now and simplify.

> 
> Otherwise, looks fine to me.


Thanks for the review.

--
Kieran