[PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Fix smps4 regulator for pm8550ve

[PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Fix smps4 regulator for pm8550ve

[Abel Vesa]

The type of the smps4 regulator from pm8550ve is actually FTSMPS525
medium voltage. So fix it accordingly.

Fixes: e6e3776d682d ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for PM8550 regulators")
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
index d990ba19c50e..b2e359ac3169 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8550ve_vreg_data[] = {
 	RPMH_VREG("smps1", "smp%s1", &pmic5_ftsmps525_lv, "vdd-s1"),
 	RPMH_VREG("smps2", "smp%s2", &pmic5_ftsmps525_lv, "vdd-s2"),
 	RPMH_VREG("smps3", "smp%s3", &pmic5_ftsmps525_lv, "vdd-s3"),
-	RPMH_VREG("smps4", "smp%s4", &pmic5_ftsmps525_lv, "vdd-s4"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps4", "smp%s4", &pmic5_ftsmps525_mv, "vdd-s4"),
 	RPMH_VREG("smps5", "smp%s5", &pmic5_ftsmps525_lv, "vdd-s5"),
 	RPMH_VREG("smps6", "smp%s6", &pmic5_ftsmps525_lv, "vdd-s6"),
 	RPMH_VREG("smps7", "smp%s7", &pmic5_ftsmps525_lv, "vdd-s7"),
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Fix smps4 regulator for pm8550ve

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:46:26 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The type of the smps4 regulator from pm8550ve is actually FTSMPS525
> medium voltage. So fix it accordingly.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Fix smps4 regulator for pm8550ve
      commit: bc00d9f3813a40bc2d854ae0edab14c6b43a3219

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark