[PATCH v2] staging: rtl8192e: Fix parenthesis alignment in rtl_core.c:325

[PATCH v2] staging: rtl8192e: Fix parenthesis alignment in rtl_core.c:325

[Gabriel Tassinari]

fix parenthesis alignment in _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response to
silence checkpatch warning:

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Tassinari <gabrieldtassinari@gmail.com>
---
v2: Include the modified file in commit message
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
index ad21263e725f..18739583f579 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response(struct r8192_priv *priv,
 
 	if (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_MASK) {
 		if (active_network &&
-				(network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
+		   (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
 			network->qos_data.active = network->qos_data.supported;
 
 		if ((network->qos_data.active == 1) && (active_network == 1) &&
-- 
2.46.0

Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8192e: Fix parenthesis alignment in rtl_core.c:325

[Philipp Hortmann]

On 8/26/24 21:58, Gabriel Tassinari wrote:
> fix parenthesis alignment in _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response to
> silence checkpatch warning:
> 
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Tassinari <gabrieldtassinari@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Include the modified file in commit message
> ---
>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
> index ad21263e725f..18739583f579 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response(struct r8192_priv *priv,
>   
>   	if (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_MASK) {
>   		if (active_network &&
> -				(network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
> +		   (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
>   			network->qos_data.active = network->qos_data.supported;
>   
>   		if ((network->qos_data.active == 1) && (active_network == 1) &&

Hi Gabriel,

I would do the indentation one space deeper to show that it is included 
in the if (
-                  (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
+                   (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))

You can ask the question why I did not tell you earlier... sorry I 
missed that and I wonder why checkpatch did not catch that.

Thanks for your support.

Bye Philipp