From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@Vger.Kernel.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs:lock_rename()/unlock_rename() can lead to deadlock in distributed fs.
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:15:13 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17088.9784.776332.225807@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
Zuzana Petrova writes:
> The problem with lock_rename() is that it compares parent directory dentries
> when trying to decide how many inode i_sem semaphores to acquire. That works
> fine on a single node system, but not in a distributed environment, on a
> distributed filesystem.
>
> The problem with rename(2) in a cluster, is that there is no guarantee that
> path_lookup()s will return a coherent path structure while at the same time
> renames, on another node, are executing on that same path hierarchy. In our
> case, in do_rename(), the parent directory path_lookup()s find/create unique
> dentries for the old_dir and new_dir, however, because a rename(2) on another
> node was executing, both dentries end up pointing to the same inode.
>
> When lock_rename(new_dir, old_dir) is called, the dentries don't match, so we
> end up in a code path that tries to acquire the inode i_sem of both the
> old_dir and new_dir, but since they point to the same inode, the second
> attempt to acquire the same i_sem results in a deadlock.
>
> A fix would be to compare the dentries ->d_inode field instead. Patch for
> kernel 2.6.12.1 attached.
reiser4 had identical patch before pseudo files were disabled. It even
went into -mm:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.9-rc1/2.6.9-rc1-mm1/broken-out/reiser4-aliased-dir.patch
Nikita.
>
> Author of the patch is Michael Gaughen <mgaughen@polyserve.com>
>
> --
> Zuzana Petrova
Nikita.
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-27 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-27 16:15 Nikita Danilov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-27 9:24 Zuzana Petrova
2005-06-27 9:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17088.9784.776332.225807@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=nikita@clusterfs.com \
--cc=Linux-Kernel@Vger.Kernel.ORG \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®