mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@gmail.com>
To: "Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paul.clements@steeleye.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] md: avoid fullsync if a faulty member missed a dirty transition
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 16:11:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <170fa0d20805081311r6b726762ndc83c5f626f0956c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18466.39418.578722.92979@notabene.brown>

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday May 6, snitzer@gmail.com wrote:
>  >
>  > It looks like bitmap_update_sb()'s incrementing of events_cleared (on
>  > behalf of the local member) could be racing with the fact that the NBD
>  > member becomes faulty (whereby making the array degraded).  This
>  > allows the events_cleared to reflect a clean->dirty transition last
>  > occurred before the array became degraded.  My reasoning is: If it was
>  > a clean->dirty transition the bitmap still has the associated dirty
>  > bit set in the local member's bitmap, so using the bitmap to resync is
>  > valid.
>  >
>  > thanks,
>  > Mike
>
>  Thanks for persisting.  I think I understand what is going on now.
>
>  How about this patch?  It is similar to your, but instead of depending
>  on the odd/even state of the event counter, it directly checks the
>  clean/dirty state of the array.

Hi Neil,

Your revised patch works great and is obviously cleaner.

Thanks!

Tested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-08 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-02 22:09 Mike Snitzer
2008-05-06  6:53 ` Neil Brown
2008-05-06 11:58   ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-08  6:13     ` Neil Brown
2008-05-08 20:11       ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2008-05-09  1:40         ` Neil Brown
2008-05-09  4:42           ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-09  5:08             ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-09  5:26               ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-09  6:01             ` Neil Brown
2008-05-09 15:00               ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-16 11:54                 ` Neil Brown
2008-05-19  4:33                   ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-19  5:27                     ` Neil Brown
2008-05-20 15:30                       ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-20 15:33                         ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-27  6:56                         ` Neil Brown
2008-05-27 14:33                           ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=170fa0d20805081311r6b726762ndc83c5f626f0956c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=snitzer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®