mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@gmail.com>
To: "Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paul.clements@steeleye.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] md: avoid fullsync if a faulty member missed a dirty transition
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 00:33:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <170fa0d20805182133o46501cc4va81b087fb6b417bf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18477.30199.992302.271647@notabene.brown>

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Friday May 9, snitzer@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Friday May 9, snitzer@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >  > Unfortunately my testing with this patch results in a full resync.
...
>> >  diff .prev/drivers/md/bitmap.c ./drivers/md/bitmap.c
>> >  --- .prev/drivers/md/bitmap.c   2008-05-09 11:02:13.000000000 +1000
>> >  +++ ./drivers/md/bitmap.c       2008-05-09 16:00:07.000000000 +1000
>> >
>> > @@ -465,8 +465,6 @@ void bitmap_update_sb(struct bitmap *bit
>> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bitmap->lock, flags);
>> >         sb = (bitmap_super_t *)kmap_atomic(bitmap->sb_page, KM_USER0);
>> >         sb->events = cpu_to_le64(bitmap->mddev->events);
>> >  -       if (!bitmap->mddev->degraded)
>> >  -               sb->events_cleared = cpu_to_le64(bitmap->mddev->events);
>>
>> Before, events_cleared was _not_ updated if the array was degraded.
>> Your patch doesn't appear to maintain that design.
>
> It does, but it is well hidden.
> Bits in the bitmap are only cleared when the array is not degraded.
> The new code for updating events_cleared is only triggered when a bit
> is about to be cleared.

Hi Neil,

Sorry about not getting back with you sooner.  Thanks for putting
significant time to chasing this problem.

I tested your most recent patch and unfortunately still hit the case
where the nbd member becomes degraded yet the array continues to clear
bits (events_cleared of the non-degraded member is higher than the
degraded member).  Is this behavior somehow expected/correct?

This was the state of the array after the nbd0 member became degraded
and the array was stopped:

# mdadm -X /dev/nbd0 /dev/sdq
        Filename : /dev/nbd0
           Magic : 6d746962
         Version : 4
            UUID : 7140cc3c:8681416c:12c5668a:984ca55d
          Events : 2642
  Events Cleared : 2642
           State : OK
       Chunksize : 128 KB
          Daemon : 5s flush period
      Write Mode : Normal
       Sync Size : 52428736 (50.00 GiB 53.69 GB)
          Bitmap : 409600 bits (chunks), 1 dirty (0.0%)

        Filename : /dev/sdq
           Magic : 6d746962
         Version : 4
            UUID : 7140cc3c:8681416c:12c5668a:984ca55d
          Events : 2646
  Events Cleared : 2645
           State : OK
       Chunksize : 128 KB
          Daemon : 5s flush period
      Write Mode : Normal
       Sync Size : 52428736 (50.00 GiB 53.69 GB)
          Bitmap : 409600 bits (chunks), 1 dirty (0.0%)


At the time the nbd0 member became degraded events_cleared was 2642.
What I'm failing to understand is how sdq's events_cleared could be
allowed to increment higher than 2642?

I've not yet taken steps to understand/verify your test script.  As
such I'm not sure it models my test scenario yet.

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-19  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-02 22:09 Mike Snitzer
2008-05-06  6:53 ` Neil Brown
2008-05-06 11:58   ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-08  6:13     ` Neil Brown
2008-05-08 20:11       ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-09  1:40         ` Neil Brown
2008-05-09  4:42           ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-09  5:08             ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-09  5:26               ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-09  6:01             ` Neil Brown
2008-05-09 15:00               ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-16 11:54                 ` Neil Brown
2008-05-19  4:33                   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2008-05-19  5:27                     ` Neil Brown
2008-05-20 15:30                       ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-20 15:33                         ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-27  6:56                         ` Neil Brown
2008-05-27 14:33                           ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=170fa0d20805182133o46501cc4va81b087fb6b417bf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=snitzer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®