mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Bastien Traverse <bastien.traverse@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.12: ethernet controller missing after resuming from suspend to RAM
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:04:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1717405.VfecqV3UgO@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FB264D.30809@gmail.com>

On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 08:44:13 AM Francis Moreau wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 07:17:37 PM Peter Wu wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 12:42:37 Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:39:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>> _STA() returns 0x0A instead of 0x0F. Could there be something missing in
> >>>>> the ACPI hotplug code that overlooks this and removes the device on
> >>>>> resume?
> >>>>
> >>>> That is possible.  Actually even quite likely, but let's wait for the
> >>>> response from Peter.
> >>>
> >>> Here's a hack that should take the 0xa return value into consideration. It
> >>> turned out that this case is even mentioned in the ACPI spec.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> This works, the devices are not lost anymore after resume. dmesg
> >> mentions the 04:00.* devices at resume compared to the unpatched kernel:
> >>
> >> [   42.650721] PM: Finishing wakeup.
> >> [   42.650768] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   42.650772] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   42.650874] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   42.650722] Restarting tasks ... done.
> >> [   42.650985] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state
> >> [   42.650988] video LNXVIDEO:01: Restoring backlight state
> >> [   43.124208] ACPI: \_SB_.AC__: ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK event: unsupported
> >> [   43.128401] jme 0000:04:00.5: irq 50 for MSI/MSI-X
> >> [   43.153005] jme 0000:04:00.5 eth0: Link is down
> >> [   43.153030] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> >> [   43.154364] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
> >> [   43.162307] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: Radio type=0x1-0x3-0x1
> >> [   43.276220] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP01
> >> [   43.276223] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP01
> >> [   43.276257] xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276267] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP02
> >> [   43.276268] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP02
> >> [   43.276355] sdhci-pci 0000:04:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276368] pci 0000:04:00.2: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276381] jmb38x_ms 0000:04:00.3: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276393] jme 0000:04:00.5: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276398] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   43.276399] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   43.276491] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.277214] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
> >>
> >> Rafael, do you want me to test the other patch as well?
> > 
> > No, thanks!
> > 
> > Mika, I'll add a changelog to your patch and queue it up as a fix for 3.14.
> > 
> 
> Thanks guys for solving this issue !
> 
> Rafael, could this be submitted to stable trees (at least 3.12, 3.13) as
> well ?

Yes, I have marked it for stable.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-12 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-05 23:42 Bastien Traverse
2014-02-06  7:38 ` Francis Moreau
2014-02-06 12:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-06 13:33     ` Francis Moreau
2014-02-06 23:15     ` Bastien Traverse
2014-02-07  7:29       ` Francis Moreau
2014-02-06 21:08 ` Peter Wu
2014-02-06 23:28   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-06 23:27     ` Peter Wu
2014-02-06 23:48       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-07 13:43         ` Peter Wu
2014-02-08 15:01           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-08 21:34             ` Peter Wu
2014-02-09 21:46               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-09 23:18                 ` Peter Wu
2014-02-10  0:52                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-10  1:15                     ` Peter Wu
2014-02-10 12:10                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-10 12:20                         ` Mika Westerberg
2014-02-10 22:39                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-11 10:42                             ` Mika Westerberg
2014-02-11 12:57                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-11 18:17                               ` Peter Wu
2014-02-11 23:58                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-12  7:44                                   ` Francis Moreau
2014-02-12 14:04                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-02-18 12:18                                       ` Bastien Traverse
2014-02-12  9:21                                   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-02-06 23:41     ` Bastien Traverse
2014-02-07  1:19       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-09 18:44         ` Bastien Traverse
2014-02-09 22:07           ` Peter Wu
2014-02-11 18:14             ` Bastien Traverse
2014-02-10  8:17           ` Francis Moreau
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-12  8:00 Francis Moreau
2013-12-12  9:28 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-12 14:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-12 17:43   ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-12 17:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-12 19:17       ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-17  8:05         ` Francis Moreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1717405.VfecqV3UgO@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=bastien.traverse@gmail.com \
    --cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
    --cc=lekensteyn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®