[PATCH v2] regulator: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro

[PATCH v2] regulator: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro

[Jeff Johnson]

On x86, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.o

Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Removed drivers/regulator/mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c from the patch and updated
  the patch description to remove the mention of this file
- Fixed the drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.c description
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-md-drivers-regulator-v1-1-da338665db7a@quicinc.com
---
 drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c   | 1 +
 drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.c | 1 +
 drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.c   | 1 +
 drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.c | 1 +
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c
index 96257551bb12..3571b6242e3a 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c
@@ -1192,4 +1192,5 @@ static struct i2c_driver da9121_regulator_driver = {
 
 module_i2c_driver(da9121_regulator_driver);
 
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Dialog Semiconductor DA9121/DA9122/DA9220/DA9217/DA9130/DA9131/DA9132 regulator driver");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.c
index 8c09dc71b16d..6614e767072f 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.c
@@ -161,4 +161,5 @@ static struct i2c_driver max20411_i2c_driver = {
 };
 module_i2c_driver(max20411_i2c_driver);
 
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Maxim MAX20411 High-Efficiency Single Step-Down Converter driver");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.c
index 97e6f7e2a0ba..dfc868a24056 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.c
@@ -202,4 +202,5 @@ static struct platform_driver rt4831_regulator_driver = {
 module_platform_driver(rt4831_regulator_driver);
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Richtek RT4831 DSV Regulators driver");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.c
index 758c70269653..65d0a5a145bd 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.c
@@ -156,4 +156,5 @@ static struct i2c_driver tps6286x_regulator_driver = {
 
 module_i2c_driver(tps6286x_regulator_driver);
 
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI TPS6286x Power Regulator driver");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

---
base-commit: 19ca0d8a433ff37018f9429f7e7739e9f3d3d2b4
change-id: 20240608-md-drivers-regulator-223215da0e16

Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:30:51 -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On x86, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.o
> 
> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
      commit: 8a2744f2955a584188a82d631937aa365d4ea966

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark