From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: intel_idle and turbostat patches for Linux-4.3
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:55:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1728562.eVm5FbEZtc@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443243915-6696-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org>
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 01:05:11 AM Len Brown wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
Hi Len,
> The following patches are available on my "intel_idle"
> and "turbostat" branches, as usual, plus here for review.
There's no intel_idle branch in your tree, but there is a cpuidle one
and I found the patch below in it, so I pulled from there.
> [PATCH 1/4] intel_idle: Skylake Client Support - updated
>
> Initial SKL intel_idle support went into 4.3-rc1.
> That patch works, but this patch makes it more optimal,
> under some conditions.
>
> [PATCH 2/4] tools/power turbostat: IVB Xeon: fix --debug regression
>
> This is a regression fix for a 4.1-rc1 patch
> It was rude for turbostat to start failing on IVB-Xeon boxes.
>
> [PATCH 3/4] tools/power turbostat: KNL workaround for %Busy and
>
> This works around a newly documented hardware quirk.
>
> [PATCH 4/4] tools/power turbostat: SKL: Adjust for TSC difference
>
> This works around an accuracy error that initially
> looked insignificant, but on some configurations it will
> be big enough to be noticed and confuse users, so here
> we address it fully.
Pulled, thanks!
Will push to Linus for 4.3-rc4.
Thanks,
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-27 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-26 5:05 Len Brown
2015-09-26 5:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] intel_idle: Skylake Client Support - updated Len Brown
2015-09-26 5:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] tools/power turbostat: IVB Xeon: fix --debug regression Len Brown
2015-09-26 5:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] tools/power turbostat: KNL workaround for %Busy and Avg_MHz Len Brown
2015-09-26 5:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] tools/power turbostat: SKL: Adjust for TSC difference from base frequency Len Brown
2015-09-27 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1728562.eVm5FbEZtc@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®