[PATCH -next] ASoC: cs42l84: Remove unused including <linux/version.h>

[PATCH -next] ASoC: cs42l84: Remove unused including <linux/version.h>

[Jiapeng Chong]

./sound/soc/codecs/cs42l84.c: 15 linux/version.h not needed.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11570
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/cs42l84.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l84.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l84.c
index 47731cdc0e67..53a6cf6e445d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l84.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l84.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
-#include <linux/version.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
-- 
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f

Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: cs42l84: Remove unused including <linux/version.h>

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:10:47 +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> ./sound/soc/codecs/cs42l84.c: 15 linux/version.h not needed.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cs42l84: Remove unused including <linux/version.h>
      commit: 334d538e176ce0c70bea5321d067432df2299bca

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark