From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akanksha@linux.ibm.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
kjain@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hbathini@linux.ibm.com, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test expr: Fix system_tsc_freq for only x86
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 23:07:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173398725978.3728083.17030127353710822170.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241205022305.158202-1-irogers@google.com>
On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:23:05 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> The refactoring of tool PMU events to have a PMU then adding the expr
> literals to the tool PMU made it so that the literal system_tsc_freq
> was only supported on x86. Update the test expectations to match -
> namely the parsing is x86 specific and only yields a non-zero value on
> Intel.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-05 2:23 Ian Rogers
2024-12-05 5:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-05 6:33 ` Ian Rogers
2024-12-05 7:09 ` Ian Rogers
2024-12-05 18:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-05 17:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2024-12-10 19:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-12-11 19:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-12 7:07 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-12-17 6:27 ` Athira Rajeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173398725978.3728083.17030127353710822170.b4-ty@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akanksha@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®