* [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation
@ 2024-11-19 11:10 Nam Cao
2024-11-28 13:02 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2024-11-19 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Samuel Holland,
Björn Töpel, linux-riscv, linux-kernel
Cc: John Ogness, Nam Cao, stable
p->ainsn.api.insn is a pointer to u32, therefore arithmetic operations are
multiplied by four. This is clearly undesirable for this case.
Cast it to (void *) first before any calculation.
Below is a sample before/after. The dumped memory is two kprobe slots, the
first slot has
- c.addiw a0, 0x1c (0x7125)
- ebreak (0x00100073)
and the second slot has:
- c.addiw a0, -4 (0x7135)
- ebreak (0x00100073)
Before this patch:
(gdb) x/16xh 0xff20000000135000
0xff20000000135000: 0x7125 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x7135 0x0010 0x0000 0x0000
0xff20000000135010: 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000
After this patch:
(gdb) x/16xh 0xff20000000125000
0xff20000000125000: 0x7125 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000 0x7135 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000
0xff20000000125010: 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000
Fixes: b1756750a397 ("riscv: kprobes: Use patch_text_nosync() for insn slots")
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index 474a65213657..d2dacea1aedd 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
p->ainsn.api.restore = (unsigned long)p->addr + len;
patch_text_nosync(p->ainsn.api.insn, &p->opcode, len);
- patch_text_nosync(p->ainsn.api.insn + len, &insn, GET_INSN_LENGTH(insn));
+ patch_text_nosync((void *)p->ainsn.api.insn + len, &insn, GET_INSN_LENGTH(insn));
}
static void __kprobes arch_prepare_simulate(struct kprobe *p)
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation
2024-11-19 11:10 [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation Nam Cao
@ 2024-11-28 13:02 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-11-29 12:19 ` Nam Cao
2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Ghiti @ 2024-11-28 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nam Cao, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
Samuel Holland, Björn Töpel, linux-riscv, linux-kernel
Cc: John Ogness, stable
Hi Nam,
On 19/11/2024 12:10, Nam Cao wrote:
> p->ainsn.api.insn is a pointer to u32, therefore arithmetic operations are
> multiplied by four. This is clearly undesirable for this case.
>
> Cast it to (void *) first before any calculation.
>
> Below is a sample before/after. The dumped memory is two kprobe slots, the
> first slot has
>
> - c.addiw a0, 0x1c (0x7125)
> - ebreak (0x00100073)
>
> and the second slot has:
>
> - c.addiw a0, -4 (0x7135)
> - ebreak (0x00100073)
>
> Before this patch:
>
> (gdb) x/16xh 0xff20000000135000
> 0xff20000000135000: 0x7125 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x7135 0x0010 0x0000 0x0000
> 0xff20000000135010: 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000
>
> After this patch:
>
> (gdb) x/16xh 0xff20000000125000
> 0xff20000000125000: 0x7125 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000 0x7135 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000
> 0xff20000000125010: 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000
>
> Fixes: b1756750a397 ("riscv: kprobes: Use patch_text_nosync() for insn slots")
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index 474a65213657..d2dacea1aedd 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> p->ainsn.api.restore = (unsigned long)p->addr + len;
>
> patch_text_nosync(p->ainsn.api.insn, &p->opcode, len);
> - patch_text_nosync(p->ainsn.api.insn + len, &insn, GET_INSN_LENGTH(insn));
> + patch_text_nosync((void *)p->ainsn.api.insn + len, &insn, GET_INSN_LENGTH(insn));
> }
>
> static void __kprobes arch_prepare_simulate(struct kprobe *p)
This looks good to me, how did you find this issue?
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Thanks,
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation
2024-11-28 13:02 ` Alexandre Ghiti
@ 2024-11-29 12:19 ` Nam Cao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2024-11-29 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Ghiti
Cc: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Samuel Holland,
Björn Töpel, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, John Ogness,
stable
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 02:02:40PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> On 19/11/2024 12:10, Nam Cao wrote:
> > p->ainsn.api.insn is a pointer to u32, therefore arithmetic operations are
> > multiplied by four. This is clearly undesirable for this case.
> >
> > Cast it to (void *) first before any calculation.
...
> This looks good to me, how did you find this issue?
I found it while working on RV monitors (Documentation/trace/rv) which
use kprobes. The monitors exploded on riscv.
Best regards,
Nam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation
2024-11-19 11:10 [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation Nam Cao
2024-11-28 13:02 ` Alexandre Ghiti
@ 2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv @ 2025-01-09 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nam Cao
Cc: linux-riscv, paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, samuel.holland, bjorn,
linux-kernel, john.ogness, stable
Hello:
This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:10:56 +0100 you wrote:
> p->ainsn.api.insn is a pointer to u32, therefore arithmetic operations are
> multiplied by four. This is clearly undesirable for this case.
>
> Cast it to (void *) first before any calculation.
>
> Below is a sample before/after. The dumped memory is two kprobe slots, the
> first slot has
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/13134cc94914
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-09 16:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-19 11:10 [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation Nam Cao
2024-11-28 13:02 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-11-29 12:19 ` Nam Cao
2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®