[PATCH for-6.14] spi: atmel-quadspi: Fix warning in doc-comment

[PATCH for-6.14] spi: atmel-quadspi: Fix warning in doc-comment

[Bence Csókás]

The doc-comment for `struct atmel_qspi_pcal` had a typo in one of the
struct members' name, causing a warning with the `W=1` option.

Fixes: 5af42209a4d2 ("spi: atmel-quadspi: Add support for sama7g5 QSPI")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501311707.Ltj0qXse-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence@prolan.hu>
---
 drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
index abdc49d9d940..d8c9be64d006 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
@@ -235,8 +235,8 @@
 /**
  * struct atmel_qspi_pcal - Pad Calibration Clock Division
  * @pclk_rate: peripheral clock rate.
- * @pclkdiv: calibration clock division. The clock applied to the calibration
- *           cell is divided by pclkdiv + 1.
+ * @pclk_div: calibration clock division. The clock applied to the calibration
+ *           cell is divided by pclk_div + 1.
  */
 struct atmel_qspi_pcal {
 	u32 pclk_rate;
-- 
2.48.1

Re: [PATCH for-6.14] spi: atmel-quadspi: Fix warning in doc-comment

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 16:12:49 +0100, Bence Csókás wrote:
> The doc-comment for `struct atmel_qspi_pcal` had a typo in one of the
> struct members' name, causing a warning with the `W=1` option.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: atmel-quadspi: Fix warning in doc-comment
      commit: 4fd2707e3e71bfd5d4df4f4c9656a009f09dfc7e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark