mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the error checking order
@ 2025-01-29  8:05 Dhananjay Ugwekar
  2025-02-11 15:06 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Dhananjay Ugwekar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dhananjay Ugwekar @ 2025-01-29  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, rui.zhang, irogers, bp
  Cc: gautham.shenoy, ravi.bangoria, x86, linux-perf-users,
	linux-kernel, Dhananjay Ugwekar, Koichiro Den

After the commit b4943b8bfc41 ("perf/x86/rapl: Add core energy counter
support for AMD CPUs"), the default "perf record"/"perf top" command is
broken in systems where there isn't a PMU registered for type
PERF_TYPE_RAW.

This is due to the change in order of error checks in rapl_pmu_event_init()
Due to which we return -EINVAL instead of -ENOENT, when we reach here from
the fallback loop in perf_init_event().

Move the "PMU and event type match" back to the beginning of the function
so that we return -ENOENT early on.

Reported-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/uv7mz6vew2bzgre5jdpmwldxljp5djzmuiksqdcdwipfm4zm7w@ribobcretidk/
Fixes: b4943b8bfc41 ("perf/x86/rapl: Add core energy counter support for AMD CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index d3bb3865c1b1..4952faf03e82 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -370,6 +370,10 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx;
 	struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus;
 
+	/* only look at RAPL events */
+	if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
 	/* unsupported modes and filters */
 	if (event->attr.sample_period) /* no sampling */
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -387,10 +391,6 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	rapl_pmus_scope = rapl_pmus->pmu.scope;
 
 	if (rapl_pmus_scope == PERF_PMU_SCOPE_PKG || rapl_pmus_scope == PERF_PMU_SCOPE_DIE) {
-		/* only look at RAPL package events */
-		if (event->attr.type != rapl_pmus_pkg->pmu.type)
-			return -ENOENT;
-
 		cfg = array_index_nospec((long)cfg, NR_RAPL_PKG_DOMAINS + 1);
 		if (!cfg || cfg >= NR_RAPL_PKG_DOMAINS + 1)
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -398,10 +398,6 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 		bit = cfg - 1;
 		event->hw.event_base = rapl_model->rapl_pkg_msrs[bit].msr;
 	} else if (rapl_pmus_scope == PERF_PMU_SCOPE_CORE) {
-		/* only look at RAPL core events */
-		if (event->attr.type != rapl_pmus_core->pmu.type)
-			return -ENOENT;
-
 		cfg = array_index_nospec((long)cfg, NR_RAPL_CORE_DOMAINS + 1);
 		if (!cfg || cfg >= NR_RAPL_PKG_DOMAINS + 1)
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-11 15:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-29  8:05 [PATCH] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the error checking order Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 15:06 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Dhananjay Ugwekar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®