From: "tip-bot2 for Ryo Takakura" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/urgent] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:06:21 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174289718274.14745.16349720260441360293.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321143322.79651-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
The following commit has been merged into the locking/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 61c39d8c83e2077f33e0a2c8980a76a7f323f0ce
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/61c39d8c83e2077f33e0a2c8980a76a7f323f0ce
Author: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 07:33:22 -07:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:46:44 +01:00
lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT
Since:
0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on PREEMPT_RT.")
the wait context test for mutex usage within "in softirq context" fails
as it references @softirq_context:
| wait context tests |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| rcu | raw | spin |mutex |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
in hardirq context: ok | ok | ok | ok |
in hardirq context (not threaded): ok | ok | ok | ok |
in softirq context: ok | ok | ok |FAILED|
As a fix, add lockdep map for BH disabled section. This fixes the
issue by letting us catch cases when local_bh_disable() gets called
with preemption disabled where local_lock doesn't get acquired.
In the case of "in softirq context" selftest, local_bh_disable() was
being called with preemption disable as it's early in the boot.
[ boqun: Move the lockdep annotations into __local_bh_*() to avoid false
positives because of unpaired local_bh_disable() reported by
Borislav Petkov and Peter Zijlstra, and make bh_lock_map
only exist for PREEMPT_RT. ]
[ mingo: Restored authorship and improved the bh_lock_map definition. ]
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250321143322.79651-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
---
kernel/softirq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 4dae6ac..513b194 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -126,6 +126,18 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct softirq_ctrl, softirq_ctrl) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(softirq_ctrl.lock),
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+static struct lock_class_key bh_lock_key;
+struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map = {
+ .name = "local_bh",
+ .key = &bh_lock_key,
+ .wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE,
+ .wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT makes BH preemptible. */
+ .lock_type = LD_LOCK_PERCPU,
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bh_lock_map);
+#endif
+
/**
* local_bh_blocked() - Check for idle whether BH processing is blocked
*
@@ -148,6 +160,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
+ lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map);
+
/* First entry of a task into a BH disabled section? */
if (!current->softirq_disable_cnt) {
if (preemptible()) {
@@ -211,6 +225,8 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+ lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
+
local_irq_save(flags);
curcnt = __this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt);
@@ -261,6 +277,8 @@ static inline void ksoftirqd_run_begin(void)
/* Counterpart to ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
static inline void ksoftirqd_run_end(void)
{
+ /* pairs with the lock_map_acquire_read() in ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
+ lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET, true);
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
local_irq_enable();
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 14:33 [PATCH v4] " Boqun Feng
2025-03-25 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 18:30 ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 10:06 ` tip-bot2 for Ryo Takakura [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174289718274.14745.16349720260441360293.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ryotkkr98@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®