From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 07:33:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321143322.79651-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw)
Since commit 0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on
PREEMPT_RT."), the wait context test for mutex usage within
"in softirq context" fails as it references @softirq_context.
[ 0.184549] | wait context tests |
[ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.184549] | rcu | raw | spin |mutex |
[ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.184550] in hardirq context: ok | ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.185083] in hardirq context (not threaded): ok | ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.185606] in softirq context: ok | ok | ok |FAILED|
As a fix, add lockdep map for BH disabled section. This fixes the
issue by letting us catch cases when local_bh_disable() gets called
with preemption disabled where local_lock doesn't get acquired.
In the case of "in softirq context" selftest, local_bh_disable() was
being called with preemption disable as it's early in the boot.
[boqun: Move the lockdep annotations into __local_bh_*() to avoid false
positives because of unpaired local_bh_disable() reported by Borislav
Petkov [1] and Peter Zijlstra [2], and make bh_lock_map only exist for
PREEMPT_RT]
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250306122413.GBZ8mT7Z61Tmgnh5Y9@fat_crate.local/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250307113955.GK16878@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250118054900.18639-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com
---
v3 -> v4:
* Move the dummy lockdep_map (for detection) to PREEMPT_RT only.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250118054900.18639-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com
I would need a tag from RT to send it for v6.16, please take a look,
thanks!
kernel/softirq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 4dae6ac2e83f..3ce136bdcbfe 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -126,6 +126,18 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct softirq_ctrl, softirq_ctrl) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(softirq_ctrl.lock),
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+static struct lock_class_key bh_lock_key;
+struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map = {
+ .name = "local_bh",
+ .key = &bh_lock_key,
+ .wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE,
+ .wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT makes BH preemptible. */
+ .lock_type = LD_LOCK_PERCPU,
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bh_lock_map);
+#endif
+
/**
* local_bh_blocked() - Check for idle whether BH processing is blocked
*
@@ -148,6 +160,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
+ lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map);
+
/* First entry of a task into a BH disabled section? */
if (!current->softirq_disable_cnt) {
if (preemptible()) {
@@ -211,6 +225,8 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+ lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
+
local_irq_save(flags);
curcnt = __this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt);
@@ -261,6 +277,8 @@ static inline void ksoftirqd_run_begin(void)
/* Counterpart to ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
static inline void ksoftirqd_run_end(void)
{
+ /* pairs with the lock_map_acquire_read() in ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
+ lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET, true);
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
local_irq_enable();
--
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 14:33 Boqun Feng [this message]
2025-03-25 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 18:30 ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 10:06 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Ryo Takakura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250321143322.79651-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryotkkr98@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®