Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add RADXA ROCK 5T support

["Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>]

On Fri, 09 May 2025 14:31:40 +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> This is a small series, depending on Sebastian Reichel's ROCK 5B+
> series[1], to also add support for the ROCK 5T.
> 
> The ROCK 5T is quite similar to the ROCK 5B+ and the ROCK 5B, so to
> share as much DT boilerplate between them as we can, this series
> reorganises things a bit and then adds the ROCK 5T .dts.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250508-rock5bp-for-upstream-v2-0-677033cc1ac2@kernel.org/T/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> ---
> Nicolas Frattaroli (3):
>       dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add RADXA ROCK 5T
>       arm64: dts: rockchip: reorganise common rock5* nodes
>       arm64: dts: rockchip: add ROCK 5T device tree
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml          |    5 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile              |    1 +
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b-5bp-5t.dtsi   | 1012 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dtsi   | 1012 +-------------------
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5t.dts    |  105 ++
>  5 files changed, 1131 insertions(+), 1004 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 19c541fe872387798a25df947f56a26212aa9a97
> change-id: 20250509-add-rock5t-fde5927de36b
> prerequisite-message-id: <20250508-rock5bp-for-upstream-v2-0-677033cc1ac2@kernel.org>
> prerequisite-patch-id: 02bf159533bb53d2cb1b6c8c7caf1d3fcfbfa4ea
> prerequisite-patch-id: fc153d1d48f19d63520086a6eaadfec2db960470
> prerequisite-patch-id: f445b893edf31ccf3311e146a53e5d24861c2475
> prerequisite-patch-id: 5dc410a438ad5a7aa8962e380d2733782f5d7d18
> prerequisite-patch-id: c70ae0e30be2a3385d2f2a09f474ff2b76293843
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> 
> 
> 


My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.

Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.

If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:

  pip3 install dtschema --upgrade


This patch series was applied (using b4) to base:
 Base: using specified base-commit 19c541fe872387798a25df947f56a26212aa9a97
 Deps: looking for dependencies matching 5 patch-ids
 Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: move rock 5b to include file
 Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: move rock 5b to include file
 Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 5B+
 Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: add Rock 5B+
 Deps: Applying prerequisite patch: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: add USB-C support for ROCK 5B+

If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag
(or use b4 which does this automatically)

New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/' for 20250509-add-rock5t-v1-0-cff1de74eced@collabora.com:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b-plus.dtb: edp@fded0000 (rockchip,rk3588-edp): clock-names:2: 'grf' was expected
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/rockchip/rockchip,analogix-dp.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5t.dtb: edp@fded0000 (rockchip,rk3588-edp): clock-names:2: 'grf' was expected
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/rockchip/rockchip,analogix-dp.yaml#