Re: [PATCH v3] counter: ti-ecap-capture: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable()

[William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 15:21:08 +0200, Waqar Hameed wrote:
> There is no need to register a manual `devm` action for
> `pm_runtime_disable()` when `devm_pm_runtime_enable()` exists. It does
> the same thing (but also calls `pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()`,
> which should be fine here).
> 
> Moreover, when `devm_add_action_or_reset()` fails, it is due to a failed
> memory allocation and will thus return `-ENOMEM`. `dev_err_probe()`
> doesn't do anything when error is `-ENOMEM`. Therefore, the call to
> `dev_err_probe()` is useless. Note that `devm_pm_runtime_enable()` has a
> tail call to `devm_add_action_or_reset()` and thus returns that value.
> Therefore, replace `dev_err_probe()` with the returning value.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] counter: ti-ecap-capture: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable()
      commit: 51548c36b37d0e84bd43a5f20bcbc36f70e61c5a

Best regards,
-- 
William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>