From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"florent . trinh-thai @ cs-soprasteria . com"
<florent.trinh-thai@cs-soprasteria.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: fsl-cpm: Check length parity before switching to 16 bit mode
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:59:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176580715873.161463.2257663574111550019.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07d1ea39a0e9b56846395d79d489a5153206ff5c.1762714267.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Sun, 09 Nov 2025 19:55:50 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit fc96ec826bce ("spi: fsl-cpm: Use 16 bit mode for large transfers
> with even size") failed to checkout that the size is really even before
> switching to 16 bit mode. Until recently the problem went unnoticed
> because kernfs uses a pre-allocated bounce buffer of size PAGE_SIZE for
> reading eeprom.
>
> But commit 8ad6249c51d0 ("eeprom: at25: convert to spi-mem API")
> introduced an additional dynamically allocated bounce buffer whose size
> is exactly the size of the transfer, leading to a buffer overrun in
> the fsl-cpm driver when that size is odd.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: fsl-cpm: Check length parity before switching to 16 bit mode
commit: 1417927df8049a0194933861e9b098669a95c762
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-09 18:55 Christophe Leroy
2025-11-10 13:07 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-11-20 8:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-12-15 13:59 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176580715873.161463.2257663574111550019.b4-ty@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=florent.trinh-thai@cs-soprasteria.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®