mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] regulator: core: fix typo in comments
@ 2026-03-23 14:03 Hugo Villeneuve
  2026-03-23 16:03 ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hugo Villeneuve @ 2026-03-23 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown; +Cc: hugo, Hugo Villeneuve, linux-kernel

From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>

Replace another->other so that the sentence makes sense.

Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 2286bdf6edcb..dc5d67767336 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	 * Existing logic does not warn if over_current_protection is given as
 	 * a constraint but driver does not support that. I think we should
 	 * warn about this type of issues as it is possible someone changes
-	 * PMIC on board to another type - and the another PMIC's driver does
+	 * PMIC on board to another type - and the other PMIC's driver does
 	 * not support setting protection. Board composer may happily believe
 	 * the DT limits are respected - especially if the new PMIC HW also
 	 * supports protection but the driver does not. I won't change the logic

base-commit: c369299895a591d96745d6492d4888259b004a9e
-- 
2.47.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-24  0:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-23 14:03 [PATCH] regulator: core: fix typo in comments Hugo Villeneuve
2026-03-23 16:03 ` Mark Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®