From: "tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] arm64/runtime-const: Use aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() for patching
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:55:17 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178531891724.112641.9549636196430358565.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728052540.4728-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: a6690350a4ae7558b39d15fcc776c4d1ab5bbf39
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a6690350a4ae7558b39d15fcc776c4d1ab5bbf39
Author: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:25:34
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:07:14 +02:00
arm64/runtime-const: Use aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() for patching
The current scheme to directly patch the kernel text for runtime
constants runs into the following issue with futex adapted to using
runtime constants on arm64:
Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual address ...
The pc points to the *p assignment in the following call chain:
futex_init()
runtime_const_init(shift, __futex_shift)
__runtime_fixup_shift()
*p = cpu_to_le32(insn);
which suggests that core_initcall() is too late to patch the kernel text
directly unlike the "d_hash_shift" which is initialized during
vfs_caches_init_early() before the protections are in place.
Use aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() to patch the runtime constants
instead of doing it directly to allow runtime_const_init() slightly
later into the boot.
Since aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() calls caches_clean_inval_pou()
internally, __runtime_fixup_caches() ends up being redundant.
runtime_const_init() are rare and the overheads of multiple calls to
caches_clean_inval_pou() instead of batching them together should be
negligible in practice.
The cpu_to_le32() conversion of instruction isn't necessary since it is
handled later in the aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() call-chain:
aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(addr, insn)
aarch64_insn_write(addr, insn)
__aarch64_insn_write(addr, cpu_to_le32(insn))
Sashiko noted that aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() does not expect a
lm_alias() address and Catalin suggested it is safe to drop the
lm_alias() for runtime patching since the kernel text is readable. The
address passed to fixup function is interpreted as a __le32 and
dereferenced as is to read the opcode at the patch site.
No functional changes are intended.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260728052540.4728-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h
index c3dbd3a..838145b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#endif
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#include <asm/text-patching.h>
/* Sigh. You can still run arm64 in BE mode */
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
@@ -50,34 +51,26 @@ static inline void __runtime_fixup_16(__le32 *p, unsigned int val)
u32 insn = le32_to_cpu(*p);
insn &= 0xffe0001f;
insn |= (val & 0xffff) << 5;
- *p = cpu_to_le32(insn);
-}
-
-static inline void __runtime_fixup_caches(void *where, unsigned int insns)
-{
- unsigned long va = (unsigned long)where;
- caches_clean_inval_pou(va, va + 4*insns);
+ aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(p, insn);
}
static inline void __runtime_fixup_ptr(void *where, unsigned long val)
{
- __le32 *p = lm_alias(where);
+ __le32 *p = where;
__runtime_fixup_16(p, val);
__runtime_fixup_16(p+1, val >> 16);
__runtime_fixup_16(p+2, val >> 32);
__runtime_fixup_16(p+3, val >> 48);
- __runtime_fixup_caches(where, 4);
}
/* Immediate value is 6 bits starting at bit #16 */
static inline void __runtime_fixup_shift(void *where, unsigned long val)
{
- __le32 *p = lm_alias(where);
+ __le32 *p = where;
u32 insn = le32_to_cpu(*p);
insn &= 0xffc0ffff;
insn |= (val & 63) << 16;
- *p = cpu_to_le32(insn);
- __runtime_fixup_caches(where, 1);
+ aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(p, insn);
}
static inline void runtime_const_fixup(void (*fn)(void *, unsigned long),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 5:25 [PATCH v6 0/8] futex: Use runtime constants for futex_hash computation K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] x86/runtime-const: Introduce runtime_const_mask_32() K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] arm64/runtime-const: Use aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() for patching K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] arm64/runtime-const: Introduce runtime_const_mask_32() K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] riscv/runtime-const: Replace open-coded placeholder with RUNTIME_MAGIC K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] riscv/runtime-const: Introduce runtime_const_mask_32() K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-07-29 10:29 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-29 11:22 ` tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] s390/runtime-const: " K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 11:22 ` tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] asm-generic/runtime-const: Add dummy runtime_const_mask_32() K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-29 11:22 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] futex: Use runtime constants for __futex_hash() hot path K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-28 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-29 6:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-29 9:55 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-29 11:22 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178531891724.112641.9549636196430358565.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®