* [PATCH net v3] net: pin protocol module before inet socket allocation
@ 2026-09-04 11:15 Chengfeng Ye
2026-09-08 14:16 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chengfeng Ye @ 2026-09-04 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Paolo Abeni, Willem de Bruijn,
David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Simon Horman
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Chengfeng Ye, stable
inet_create() and inet6_create() look up the protocol under
rcu_read_lock(), then drop RCU before using the resulting proto.
sk_alloc() uses GFP_KERNEL, so RCU cannot be held across it.
A loadable protocol can be unregistered in that window.
inet_unregister_protosw() waits with synchronize_net() only for readers
still in the RCU section. After rcu_read_unlock(), module exit can run
proto_unregister(), destroy prot->slab, and free the module. inet_create()
then uses a dangling proto pointer:
CPU 0 inet_create CPU 1 l2tp_ip_exit
rcu_read_lock()
answer_prot = answer->prot
rcu_read_unlock() inet_unregister_protosw()
synchronize_net()
proto_unregister()
kmem_cache_destroy(slab)
WARN_ON(!answer_prot->slab)
sk_alloc() -> kmem_cache_alloc(stale)
This was reproduced with socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_L2TP)
racing delete_module("l2tp_ip"):
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range
RIP: kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x63/0x370
Call Trace:
sk_prot_alloc+0x74/0x2c0
sk_alloc+0x2b/0x6c0
inet_create+0x2cd/0xd40
__sock_create+0x1c3/0x430
__sys_socket+0x116/0x1d0
A protosw can also be published while its owner is in
MODULE_STATE_COMING. try_module_get() accepts modules in that state, but
module initialization failure does not wait for such references before
freeing the module. A protocol initialization unwind can therefore destroy
the slab and module image despite the reference.
Cache the proto and its owner while still under RCU. Reject an owner in
MODULE_STATE_COMING, then pin it before leaving the RCU section. The RCU
section protects the rejection path against initialization failure, while
the module reference protects the allocation path against normal unload.
sk_prot_alloc() obtains the socket-lifetime reference. Drop the temporary
reference after sk_alloc(). In inet6_create(), use the cached proto rather
than dereferencing the protosw after leaving RCU.
Fixes: a79af59efd20 ("[NET]: Fix module reference counts for loadable protocol modules")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Reject protocol owners in MODULE_STATE_COMING before taking a temporary
module reference.
- Cache the owner under RCU and use that pointer for module_put().
- Use the cached proto for the IPv6 backlog callback instead of
dereferencing the protosw after RCU unlock.
Changes in v2:
- Pin answer_prot->owner in inet_create()/inet6_create() under RCU instead
of reordering try_module_get() in sk_prot_alloc().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260825172349.232794-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/ [v2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260823171311.3857087-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/ [v1]
---
net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 32d006c1a8ee..6b87f0b6cc22 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ static int inet_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
struct inet_protosw *answer;
struct inet_sock *inet;
struct proto *answer_prot;
+ struct module *answer_owner;
unsigned char answer_flags;
int try_loading_module = 0;
int err;
@@ -322,9 +323,16 @@ static int inet_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW))
goto out_rcu_unlock;
- sock->ops = answer->ops;
answer_prot = answer->prot;
+ answer_owner = answer_prot->owner;
answer_flags = answer->flags;
+ if (answer_owner &&
+ (module_is_coming(answer_owner) ||
+ !try_module_get(answer_owner))) {
+ err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+ goto out_rcu_unlock;
+ }
+ sock->ops = answer->ops;
rcu_read_unlock();
WARN_ON(!answer_prot->slab);
@@ -332,7 +340,7 @@ static int inet_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
err = -ENOMEM;
sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_INET, GFP_KERNEL, answer_prot, kern);
if (!sk)
- goto out;
+ goto out_module_put;
err = 0;
if (INET_PROTOSW_REUSE & answer_flags)
@@ -398,6 +406,8 @@ static int inet_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
if (err)
goto out_sk_release;
}
+out_module_put:
+ module_put(answer_owner);
out:
return err;
out_rcu_unlock:
@@ -406,7 +416,7 @@ static int inet_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
out_sk_release:
sk_common_release(sk);
sock->sk = NULL;
- goto out;
+ goto out_module_put;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
index 282912a11999..1df8b2e7e243 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
struct sock *sk;
struct inet_protosw *answer;
struct proto *answer_prot;
+ struct module *answer_owner;
unsigned char answer_flags;
int try_loading_module = 0;
int err;
@@ -167,9 +168,16 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW))
goto out_rcu_unlock;
- sock->ops = answer->ops;
answer_prot = answer->prot;
+ answer_owner = answer_prot->owner;
answer_flags = answer->flags;
+ if (answer_owner &&
+ (module_is_coming(answer_owner) ||
+ !try_module_get(answer_owner))) {
+ err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+ goto out_rcu_unlock;
+ }
+ sock->ops = answer->ops;
rcu_read_unlock();
WARN_ON(!answer_prot->slab);
@@ -177,7 +185,7 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
err = -ENOBUFS;
sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_INET6, GFP_KERNEL, answer_prot, kern);
if (!sk)
- goto out;
+ goto out_module_put;
sock_init_data(sock, sk);
@@ -201,7 +209,7 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
sk->sk_family = PF_INET6;
sk->sk_protocol = protocol;
- sk->sk_backlog_rcv = answer->prot->backlog_rcv;
+ sk->sk_backlog_rcv = answer_prot->backlog_rcv;
inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 = np = inet6_sk_generic(sk);
np->hop_limit = -1;
@@ -251,6 +259,8 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
if (err)
goto out_sk_release;
}
+out_module_put:
+ module_put(answer_owner);
out:
return err;
out_rcu_unlock:
@@ -259,7 +269,7 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
out_sk_release:
sk_common_release(sk);
sock->sk = NULL;
- goto out;
+ goto out_module_put;
}
int __inet6_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int addr_len,
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: pin protocol module before inet socket allocation
2026-09-04 11:15 [PATCH net v3] net: pin protocol module before inet socket allocation Chengfeng Ye
@ 2026-09-08 14:16 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sashiko @ 2026-09-08 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nicoyip.dev
Cc: edumazet, kuniyu, pabeni, willemb, davem, kuba, horms, netdev,
linux-kernel, stable
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
- [High] The newly added `module_is_coming(answer_owner)` rejection in
`inet_create()` (net/ipv4/af_inet.c) and `inet6_create()`…
--
net: pin protocol module before inet socket allocation
The patch caches answer->prot and its owner module while still under
rcu_read_lock() in inet_create() and inet6_create(), rejects an owner that
is in MODULE_STATE_COMING, and otherwise pins the module with
try_module_get() before dropping RCU. The temporary reference is dropped
after sk_alloc() via a new out_module_put label.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260825172349.232794-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/ [v2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260823171311.3857087-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/ [v1]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index 32d006c1a8eed..6b87f0b6cc222 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -322,9 +323,16 @@ static int inet_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
> !ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW))
> goto out_rcu_unlock;
>
> - sock->ops = answer->ops;
> answer_prot = answer->prot;
> + answer_owner = answer_prot->owner;
> answer_flags = answer->flags;
> + if (answer_owner &&
> + (module_is_coming(answer_owner) ||
> + !try_module_get(answer_owner))) {
> + err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> + goto out_rcu_unlock;
> + }
> + sock->ops = answer->ops;
> rcu_read_unlock();
[Severity: High]
Can this module_is_coming() rejection break modular protocols that create
a socket for their own protosw from their own module init path?
module_is_coming() is true for the whole duration of the owner module's
init function:
include/linux/module.h:
static inline bool module_is_coming(struct module *mod)
{
return mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING;
}
kernel/module/main.c sets MODULE_STATE_COMING before calling
do_init_module(), and only sets MODULE_STATE_LIVE after mod->init()
returns.
SCTP (CONFIG_IP_SCTP=m) looks like it hits this. sctp_init() publishes the
protosws first and then calls register_pernet_subsys(), which runs the
.init hook immediately for existing net namespaces:
net/sctp/protocol.c:sctp_init() {
...
status = sctp_v4_protosw_init();
...
status = sctp_v6_protosw_init();
...
status = register_pernet_subsys(&sctp_ctrlsock_ops);
if (status)
goto err_register_ctrlsock;
...
}
so sctp_ctrlsock_init() -> sctp_ctl_sock_init() runs inside sctp_init(),
while sctp.ko is still MODULE_STATE_COMING:
net/sctp/protocol.c:sctp_ctl_sock_init() {
...
err = inet_ctl_sock_create(&net->sctp.ctl_sock, family,
SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP, net);
/* If IPv6 socket could not be created, try the IPv4 socket */
if (err < 0 && family == PF_INET6)
err = inet_ctl_sock_create(&net->sctp.ctl_sock, AF_INET,
SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP,
net);
...
}
inet_ctl_sock_create() goes through sock_create_kern() -> __sock_create()
-> inet6_create()/inet_create(), and the new check does not exempt kern
sockets. sctp_prot.owner and sctpv6_prot.owner are THIS_MODULE, which is
non-NULL for a modular build, so both attempts would return
-EPROTONOSUPPORT, sctp_ctrlsock_init() would print "Failed to initialize
the SCTP control sock", register_pernet_subsys() would propagate the
error, and sctp_init() would unwind. Would modprobe sctp then fail
outright?
There is a note about exactly this pattern above module_is_coming():
include/linux/module.h:
/* FIXME: It'd be nice to isolate modules during init, too, so they
aren't used before they (may) fail. But presently too much code
(IDE & SCSI) require entry into the module during init.*/
Separately, for tasks that are not the loading task: once a modular
protocol has published its protosw but has not finished init, a concurrent
socket() finds the protosw, so the existing try_loading_module /
request_module() retry loop is not entered (the lookup succeeded), and the
caller gets -EPROTONOSUPPORT for what is a transient state. Should that
window either succeed or wait rather than returning a user-visible error?
One correction to the reasoning behind this concern: the ipv6 module case
does not apply in this tree. menuconfig IPV6 in net/ipv6/Kconfig is bool
and inet6_init is registered with device_initcall(), so rawv6_prot.owner is
NULL and the answer_owner && test short-circuits. The inet6_create() site
below is still reached by SCTP's first PF_INET6 control-socket attempt,
whose proto owner is the still-coming sctp module.
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> index 282912a119999..1df8b2e7e2437 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -167,9 +168,16 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
> !ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW))
> goto out_rcu_unlock;
>
> - sock->ops = answer->ops;
> answer_prot = answer->prot;
> + answer_owner = answer_prot->owner;
> answer_flags = answer->flags;
> + if (answer_owner &&
> + (module_is_coming(answer_owner) ||
> + !try_module_get(answer_owner))) {
> + err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> + goto out_rcu_unlock;
> + }
> + sock->ops = answer->ops;
> rcu_read_unlock();
[Severity: High]
Same question here for the IPv6 path: this is the site reached by
sctp_ctl_sock_init()'s first attempt, inet_ctl_sock_create(..., PF_INET6,
SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP, net), where sctpv6_prot.owner is the sctp
module in MODULE_STATE_COMING. Does that attempt now return
-EPROTONOSUPPORT before the AF_INET fallback, which then fails for the same
reason?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260904111514.584264-1-nicoyip.dev%40gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-08 14:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-04 11:15 [PATCH net v3] net: pin protocol module before inet socket allocation Chengfeng Ye
2026-09-08 14:16 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®