From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com,
kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nicoyip.dev@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v9 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 20:49:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178890058672.219967.10512339930697519360@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907113743.1453210-11-dhowells@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1 (1)
- [High] Link/modpost failure in valid configurations: the newly added
call to `crypto_krb5_find_enctype()` in…
- [Low] Key quota over-charge newly reachable: in
`rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk()` (net/rxrpc/key.c:206) the full token…
Pre-existing issues:
- [Low] `rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk()` now resolves the krb5 enctype
handle but discards it, so the user-supplied session-key length…
--
rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported
The RxGK token parser in net/rxrpc/key.c now looks up the userspace-supplied
encryption type and rejects the token with -ENOPKG when the enctype is not
known. The return value of rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() is changed from a
hardcoded -EKEYREJECTED to a new local variable so the new error code can be
propagated.
Link: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260824091645.415423-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/key.c b/net/rxrpc/key.c
> index a0aa78d892897..30d6db052c216 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/key.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/key.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
> const __be32 *ticket, *key;
> s64 tmp;
> size_t raw_keylen, raw_tktlen, keylen, tktlen;
> + int ret = -EKEYREJECTED;
>
> _enter(",{%x,%x,%x,%x},%x",
> ntohl(xdr[0]), ntohl(xdr[1]), ntohl(xdr[2]), ntohl(xdr[3]),
> @@ -229,6 +230,11 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
> token->rxgk->key.data = token->rxgk->_key;
> token->rxgk->ticket.len = raw_tktlen;
>
> + if (!crypto_krb5_find_enctype(token->rxgk->enctype)) {
> + ret = -ENOPKG;
> + goto reject_token;
> + }
> +
[Severity: High]
Does this build with CONFIG_AF_RXRPC=y (or m) and CONFIG_RXGK=n?
key.o is built unconditionally, while crypto_krb5_find_enctype() only exists
when CRYPTO_KRB5 is built:
net/rxrpc/Makefile:
rxrpc-y := \
...
key.o \
...
rxrpc-$(CONFIG_RXGK) += \
rxgk.o \
rxgk_app.o \
rxgk_kdf.o
crypto/krb5/Makefile:
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_KRB5) += krb5.o
net/rxrpc/Kconfig has AF_RXRPC selecting only CRYPTO, CRYPTO_LIB_DES if
RXKAD, KEYS and NET_UDP_TUNNEL; the "select CRYPTO_KRB5" lives in the
optional RXGK bool, which defaults to n. So AF_RXRPC=y, RXGK=n,
CRYPTO_KRB5=n looks like a legal configuration, and the declaration in
include/crypto/krb5.h (reached via include/keys/rxrpc-type.h) has no
!CONFIG_CRYPTO_KRB5 stub, so the failure would only show up at link or
modpost time as an undefined crypto_krb5_find_enctype. The same would apply
to AF_RXRPC=y with CRYPTO_KRB5=m.
The other rxrpc caller guards this exact call:
net/rxrpc/rxperf.c:
#ifdef CONFIG_RXGK
/*
* Add a yfs-rxgk key to the security keyring.
*/
static int rxperf_add_yfs_rxgk_key(struct key *keyring, u32 enctype)
{
const struct krb5_enctype *krb5 = crypto_krb5_find_enctype(enctype);
Should the new call site be wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_RXGK too, or should
AF_RXRPC select CRYPTO_KRB5? Neither net/rxrpc/Kconfig nor
net/rxrpc/Makefile is touched anywhere later in the series, and the patch
carries a cc: stable tag.
[Severity: Low]
Can this over-charge the caller's key quota?
Earlier in rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() the whole token cost is accounted
before any validation:
plen = sizeof(*token) + sizeof(*token->rxgk) + tktlen + keylen;
prep->quotalen += datalen + plen;
The new path frees the token and returns -ENOPKG without undoing that
addition, and rxrpc_preparse_xdr() treats -ENOPKG as a per-token error that
does not abort the key:
case -ENOPKG:
if (ret != 0)
ret = -ENOPKG;
break;
So a payload holding one parsable token (say rxkad) plus an RxGK token with
an unsupported enctype gets instantiated while prep->quotalen still includes
the discarded RxGK token. Before this change every reject_token path
returned -EKEYREJECTED, which hit the default: case and failed the whole
instantiation, so the inflated value was never committed. Would it be
simpler to do the enctype lookup before the prep->quotalen update, or to
subtract it again on this path?
[Severity: Low]
This is a pre-existing issue and not introduced by this patch, but now that
the enctype descriptor is looked up here, should raw_keylen also be checked
against krb5->key_len? The returned pointer is discarded, so the
user-supplied key length (bounded only by AFSTOKEN_GK_KEY_MAX, and allowed
to be 0) is still unvalidated.
The server-key parser pairs the two checks:
net/rxrpc/rxgk.c:rxgk_preparse_server_key() {
krb5 = crypto_krb5_find_enctype(enctype);
if (!krb5)
return -ENOPKG;
...
}
At use time rxgk_derive_transport_key() passes &rxgk->key to
crypto_krb5_calc_PRFplus(), and the rfc8009 profile just does:
crypto/krb5/rfc8009_aes2.c:rfc8009_calc_KDF_HMAC_SHA2() {
ret = crypto_shash_setkey(shash, key->data, key->len);
...
}
HMAC accepts any length, so a transport key gets derived from a truncated or
empty session key, while the rfc3961/rfc3962 profiles fail later:
crypto/krb5/rfc3961_simplified.c:rfc3961_calc_DK() {
if (inkey->len != keylength || result->len != keylength)
return -EINVAL;
...
}
All consumers honour key.len, so there is no out-of-bounds access, just
acceptance of malformed key material and inconsistent late failures.
> if (token->rxgk->endtime != 0) {
> expiry = rxrpc_s64_to_time64(token->rxgk->endtime);
> if (expiry < 0)
> @@ -280,7 +286,7 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
> kfree(token->rxgk);
> kfree(token);
> reject:
> - return -EKEYREJECTED;
> + return ret;
> expired:
> kfree(token->rxgk);
> kfree(token);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260907113743.1453210-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 11:37 [PATCH net v9 00/14] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 01/14] afs: Fix lack of loop around sendmsg() to rxrpc David Howells
2026-09-07 13:06 ` David Laight
2026-09-10 10:18 ` David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 02/14] afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 03/14] rxrpc: Fix lack of loop around reply send in rxperf server David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 04/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 05/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 06/14] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 07/14] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 08/14] rxrpc: Fix double IRQ enablement David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 09/14] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 11/14] afs: Fix creation of RxGK CM channel token to have right size David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 12/14] afs: Fix lack of setting call->server when doing FS.InlineBulkStatus David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 13/14] rxrpc: fix use-after-free in rxrpc_poke_conn() David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 14/14] rxrpc: Take write lock when publishing the initial RxGK key David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178890058672.219967.10512339930697519360@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®