From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v9 14/14] rxrpc: Take write lock when publishing the initial RxGK key
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 12:37:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907113743.1453210-15-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907113743.1453210-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
From: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
rxgk_rekey() updates the transport-key ring under security_use_lock,
and rxgk_get_key() takes a reference under the corresponding read
lock. The initial publication in rxgk_init_connection_security()
writes conn->rxgk.enctype and conn->rxgk.keys[] without the write
lock.
On a client connection, a second sendmsg can observe
RXRPC_CONN_CLIENT through a lockless load of conn->state, skip
rxrpc_init_client_conn_security(), and call rxgk_get_key() without
ever acquiring security_lock. Because the initializer never took
the write lock, the reader's read lock provides neither exclusion
nor a matching acquire-release pair.
Concurrent RxGK key consumers were observed in a two-sender
workload. KCSAN reported:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rxgk_get_key / rxgk_secure_packet
write to 0xffff8aef4023c318 of 8 bytes by task 1968 on cpu 0:
rxgk_secure_packet+0x46c/0x820
rxrpc_send_data+0x562/0x1a20
rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x976/0xa80
rxrpc_sendmsg+0x20f/0x2a0
read to 0xffff8aef4023c318 of 8 bytes by task 1969 on cpu 1:
rxgk_get_key+0x209/0x5e0
rxgk_alloc_txbuf+0xa4/0x2a0
rxrpc_send_data+0x8e2/0x1a20
rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x976/0xa80
rxrpc_sendmsg+0x20f/0x2a0
value changed: 0x7fffffffffffffff -> 0x7fffffffffffffee
That report is on the key context's byte counter rather than the
initial publication, but it shows that lookup and secured transmit
already overlap on the same connection.
Take security_use_lock for writing while publishing the initial
enctype and transport key, matching the locking used when rekeying.
Fixes: 9d1d2b59341f ("rxrpc: rxgk: Implement the yfs-rxgk security class (GSSAPI)")
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/rxgk.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxgk.c b/net/rxrpc/rxgk.c
index 77a67ace1d24..b49221f57f67 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/rxgk.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/rxgk.c
@@ -251,8 +251,10 @@ static int rxgk_init_connection_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
GFP_NOFS);
if (IS_ERR(gk))
return PTR_ERR(gk);
+ write_lock(&conn->security_use_lock);
conn->rxgk.enctype = gk->krb5->etype;
conn->rxgk.keys[gk->key_number & 3] = gk;
+ write_unlock(&conn->security_use_lock);
switch (conn->security_level) {
case RXRPC_SECURITY_PLAIN:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 11:37 [PATCH net v9 00/14] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 01/14] afs: Fix lack of loop around sendmsg() to rxrpc David Howells
2026-09-07 13:06 ` David Laight
2026-09-10 10:18 ` David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 02/14] afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 03/14] rxrpc: Fix lack of loop around reply send in rxperf server David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 04/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 05/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 06/14] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 07/14] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 08/14] rxrpc: Fix double IRQ enablement David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 09/14] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 11/14] afs: Fix creation of RxGK CM channel token to have right size David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 12/14] afs: Fix lack of setting call->server when doing FS.InlineBulkStatus David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 13/14] rxrpc: fix use-after-free in rxrpc_poke_conn() David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-09-08 20:49 ` [PATCH net v9 14/14] rxrpc: Take write lock when publishing the initial RxGK key netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907113743.1453210-15-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®