* [PATCH v4 0/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow problems
@ 2026-09-10 15:15 Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2026-09-10 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner,
Thomas Gleixner, Ryan Roberts, Thomas Weißschuh,
Douglas Anderson, Huacai Chen
Cc: Mark Rutland, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Sang-Heon Jeon
Hi,
Here are v4 patches to fix bootconfig size overflow issue. If there is a wrong
bootconfig size is recorded, it can bypass the size check in the tool and the
kernel.
Here is the previous version.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/178900555453.200943.4719889510443114485.stgit@devnote2/
This version removes redundant and wrong size check in setup_boot_config()
and add correct error message for size > XBC_DATA_MAX.
Thank you,
---
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) (2):
tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks
bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check
init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
tools/bootconfig/main.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 1/2] tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks 2026-09-10 15:15 [PATCH v4 0/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow problems Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2026-09-10 15:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 2026-09-10 16:16 ` Sang-Heon Jeon 2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2026-09-10 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Thomas Gleixner, Ryan Roberts, Thomas Weißschuh, Douglas Anderson, Huacai Chen Cc: Mark Rutland, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Sang-Heon Jeon From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Sashiko reported that on 32-bit systems, if an attacker crafts size in the bootconfig footer such that adding BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE wraps around (for instance, if size is 0xFFFFFFFF), the size check in load_xbc_from_initrd() can be bypassed: if (stat.st_size < size + BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) { pr_err("bootconfig size is too big\n"); return -E2BIG; } Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, comparing a corrupted 32-bit size (e.g. 0xFFFFFFFF) against stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE can also bypass the check if size is not bounded. Similarly, load_xbc_file() passes 64-bit stat.st_size directly into the 32-bit int size parameter of load_xbc_fd(), truncating large standalone files (>= 2GB). In both cases, passing 0xFFFFFFFF to load_xbc_fd() truncates to -1, resulting in malloc(0), an integer overflow in read(), and an out-of-bounds null-byte write. Fix this by: 1. Rejecting size > XBC_DATA_MAX or size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE in load_xbc_from_initrd(). 2. Rejecting stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX in load_xbc_file() before passing it to load_xbc_fd(). 3. Checking size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX defensively in load_xbc_fd(). Fixes: 950313ebf79c ("tools: bootconfig: Add bootconfig command") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909161113.16C691F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260910010137.EE0431F000FF@smtp.kernel.org/ Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> --- Changes in v3: - Reject size > XBC_DATA_MAX and size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE in load_xbc_from_initrd() to prevent bypass on initrd > 4.29 GB. - Check stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX in load_xbc_file() to prevent truncation on large standalone files. - Check size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX defensively in load_xbc_fd(). Changes in v2: - Add Cc: stable. - Also reject if "size > XBC_DATA_MAX", that is obviously wrong. --- tools/bootconfig/main.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/main.c b/tools/bootconfig/main.c index 7dc9fff9b637..17d971d47f87 100644 --- a/tools/bootconfig/main.c +++ b/tools/bootconfig/main.c @@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ static int load_xbc_fd(int fd, char **buf, int size) { int ret; + if (size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + *buf = malloc(size + 1); if (!*buf) return -ENOMEM; @@ -168,6 +171,13 @@ static int load_xbc_file(const char *path, char **buf) return ret; } + if (stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX) { + pr_err("%s size is too big\n", path); + ret = -E2BIG; + close(fd); + return ret; + } + ret = load_xbc_fd(fd, buf, stat.st_size); close(fd); @@ -218,7 +228,8 @@ static int load_xbc_from_initrd(int fd, char **buf) csum = le32toh(csum); /* Wrong size error */ - if (stat.st_size < size + BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) { + if (size > XBC_DATA_MAX || + size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) { pr_err("bootconfig size is too big\n"); return -E2BIG; } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks 2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2026-09-10 16:16 ` Sang-Heon Jeon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Sang-Heon Jeon @ 2026-09-10 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Cc: Andrew Morton, Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Thomas Gleixner, Ryan Roberts, Thomas Weißschuh, Douglas Anderson, Huacai Chen, Mark Rutland, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 12:15 AM Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > Sashiko reported that on 32-bit systems, if an attacker crafts size in > the bootconfig footer such that adding BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE wraps around > (for instance, if size is 0xFFFFFFFF), the size check in > load_xbc_from_initrd() can be bypassed: > > if (stat.st_size < size + BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) { > pr_err("bootconfig size is too big\n"); > return -E2BIG; > } > > Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, comparing a > corrupted 32-bit size (e.g. 0xFFFFFFFF) against > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE can also bypass the check if > size is not bounded. Similarly, load_xbc_file() passes 64-bit stat.st_size > directly into the 32-bit int size parameter of load_xbc_fd(), truncating > large standalone files (>= 2GB). > > In both cases, passing 0xFFFFFFFF to load_xbc_fd() truncates to -1, > resulting in malloc(0), an integer overflow in read(), and an > out-of-bounds null-byte write. > > Fix this by: > 1. Rejecting size > XBC_DATA_MAX or > size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE in load_xbc_from_initrd(). > 2. Rejecting stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX in load_xbc_file() before passing > it to load_xbc_fd(). > 3. Checking size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX defensively in load_xbc_fd(). > > Fixes: 950313ebf79c ("tools: bootconfig: Add bootconfig command") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909161113.16C691F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/ > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260910010137.EE0431F000FF@smtp.kernel.org/ > Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > --- > Changes in v3: > - Reject size > XBC_DATA_MAX and > size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE in load_xbc_from_initrd() > to prevent bypass on initrd > 4.29 GB. > - Check stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX in load_xbc_file() to prevent > truncation on large standalone files. > - Check size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX defensively in load_xbc_fd(). > Changes in v2: > - Add Cc: stable. > - Also reject if "size > XBC_DATA_MAX", that is obviously wrong. > --- > tools/bootconfig/main.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/main.c b/tools/bootconfig/main.c > index 7dc9fff9b637..17d971d47f87 100644 > --- a/tools/bootconfig/main.c > +++ b/tools/bootconfig/main.c > @@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ static int load_xbc_fd(int fd, char **buf, int size) > { > int ret; > > + if (size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX) > + return -EINVAL; > + > *buf = malloc(size + 1); > if (!*buf) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -168,6 +171,13 @@ static int load_xbc_file(const char *path, char **buf) > return ret; > } > > + if (stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX) { > + pr_err("%s size is too big\n", path); > + ret = -E2BIG; > + close(fd); > + return ret; > + } > + > ret = load_xbc_fd(fd, buf, stat.st_size); > > close(fd); > @@ -218,7 +228,8 @@ static int load_xbc_from_initrd(int fd, char **buf) > csum = le32toh(csum); > > /* Wrong size error */ > - if (stat.st_size < size + BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) { > + if (size > XBC_DATA_MAX || > + size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) { > pr_err("bootconfig size is too big\n"); > return -E2BIG; > } > Reviewed-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check 2026-09-10 15:15 [PATCH v4 0/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow problems Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2026-09-10 15:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 2026-09-10 16:29 ` Sang-Heon Jeon 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2026-09-10 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Thomas Gleixner, Ryan Roberts, Thomas Weißschuh, Douglas Anderson, Huacai Chen Cc: Mark Rutland, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Sang-Heon Jeon From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Sashiko reported that in get_boot_config_from_initrd(), a crafted initrd with a huge bootconfig size (such as 0xFFFFFFFF) can cause the pointer arithmetic: data = ((void *)hdr) - size; to wrap around on 32-bit systems (or when pointer subtraction overflows). Because data wraps around, the subsequent bounds check: if ((unsigned long)data < initrd_start) evaluates to false, bypassing the check. The kernel then calls xbc_calc_checksum(data, size), which attempts to read 4GB of memory, hitting unmapped pages and triggering a fatal kernel page fault during early boot. Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, an unbounded 32-bit size can similarly bypass the initrd_start check. Fix this by: 1. Ensuring the initrd is at least large enough to contain the bootconfig footer and verifying hdr is within the initrd bounds. 2. Checking that size does not exceed XBC_DATA_MAX and does not exceed the available space between initrd_start and hdr before performing pointer subtraction. Fixes: de462e5f1071 ("bootconfig: Fix to remove bootconfig data from initrd while boot") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260910010137.EE0431F000FF@smtp.kernel.org/ Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> --- Changes in v4: - Accurate the error message for size > XBC_DATA_MAX in get_boot_config_from_initrd(). - Remove redundant (and wrong) size >= XBC_DATA_MAX check from setup_boot_config(). --- init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c index 2613d3f9b3ce..16749bb7a219 100644 --- a/init/main.c +++ b/init/main.c @@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) u8 *hdr; int i; - if (!initrd_end) + if (!initrd_end || initrd_end < initrd_start || + initrd_end - initrd_start < BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN + 8) return NULL; data = (char *)initrd_end - BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN; @@ -294,16 +295,26 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) found: hdr = (u8 *)(data - 8); + if ((unsigned long)hdr < initrd_start) + return NULL; + size = get_unaligned_le32(hdr); csum = get_unaligned_le32(hdr + 4); - data = ((void *)hdr) - size; - if ((unsigned long)data < initrd_start) { - pr_err("bootconfig size %d is greater than initrd size %ld\n", + if (size > XBC_DATA_MAX) { + pr_err("bootconfig size %u is greater than max size %d\n", + size, XBC_DATA_MAX); + return NULL; + } + + if (size > ((unsigned long)hdr - initrd_start)) { + pr_err("bootconfig size %u is greater than initrd size %lu\n", size, initrd_end - initrd_start); return NULL; } + data = ((void *)hdr) - size; + if (xbc_calc_checksum(data, size) != csum) { pr_err("bootconfig checksum failed\n"); return NULL; @@ -394,12 +405,6 @@ static void __init setup_boot_config(void) return; } - if (size >= XBC_DATA_MAX) { - pr_err("bootconfig size %ld greater than max size %d\n", - (long)size, XBC_DATA_MAX); - return; - } - ret = xbc_init(data, size, &msg, &pos); if (ret < 0) { if (pos < 0) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check 2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2026-09-10 16:29 ` Sang-Heon Jeon 2026-09-11 6:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Sang-Heon Jeon @ 2026-09-10 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Cc: Andrew Morton, Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Thomas Gleixner, Ryan Roberts, Thomas Weißschuh, Douglas Anderson, Huacai Chen, Mark Rutland, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 12:15 AM Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > Sashiko reported that in get_boot_config_from_initrd(), a crafted initrd > with a huge bootconfig size (such as 0xFFFFFFFF) can cause the pointer > arithmetic: > > data = ((void *)hdr) - size; > > to wrap around on 32-bit systems (or when pointer subtraction overflows). > Because data wraps around, the subsequent bounds check: > > if ((unsigned long)data < initrd_start) > > evaluates to false, bypassing the check. The kernel then calls > xbc_calc_checksum(data, size), which attempts to read 4GB of memory, > hitting unmapped pages and triggering a fatal kernel page fault during > early boot. Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, an > unbounded 32-bit size can similarly bypass the initrd_start check. > > Fix this by: > 1. Ensuring the initrd is at least large enough to contain the bootconfig > footer and verifying hdr is within the initrd bounds. > 2. Checking that size does not exceed XBC_DATA_MAX and does not exceed > the available space between initrd_start and hdr before performing > pointer subtraction. > > Fixes: de462e5f1071 ("bootconfig: Fix to remove bootconfig data from initrd while boot") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260910010137.EE0431F000FF@smtp.kernel.org/ > Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > --- > Changes in v4: > - Accurate the error message for size > XBC_DATA_MAX in > get_boot_config_from_initrd(). > - Remove redundant (and wrong) size >= XBC_DATA_MAX check from > setup_boot_config(). > --- > init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c > index 2613d3f9b3ce..16749bb7a219 100644 > --- a/init/main.c > +++ b/init/main.c > @@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) > u8 *hdr; > int i; > > - if (!initrd_end) > + if (!initrd_end || initrd_end < initrd_start || > + initrd_end - initrd_start < BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN + 8) > return NULL; (nit) how about moving BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE from tools and using it instead? > data = (char *)initrd_end - BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN; > @@ -294,16 +295,26 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) > > found: > hdr = (u8 *)(data - 8); > + if ((unsigned long)hdr < initrd_start) > + return NULL; > + > size = get_unaligned_le32(hdr); > csum = get_unaligned_le32(hdr + 4); > > - data = ((void *)hdr) - size; > - if ((unsigned long)data < initrd_start) { > - pr_err("bootconfig size %d is greater than initrd size %ld\n", > + if (size > XBC_DATA_MAX) { > + pr_err("bootconfig size %u is greater than max size %d\n", > + size, XBC_DATA_MAX); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + if (size > ((unsigned long)hdr - initrd_start)) { > + pr_err("bootconfig size %u is greater than initrd size %lu\n", > size, initrd_end - initrd_start); > return NULL; > } > > + data = ((void *)hdr) - size; > + > if (xbc_calc_checksum(data, size) != csum) { > pr_err("bootconfig checksum failed\n"); > return NULL; > @@ -394,12 +405,6 @@ static void __init setup_boot_config(void) > return; > } > > - if (size >= XBC_DATA_MAX) { > - pr_err("bootconfig size %ld greater than max size %d\n", > - (long)size, XBC_DATA_MAX); > - return; > - } > - Nice cleanup! > ret = xbc_init(data, size, &msg, &pos); > if (ret < 0) { > if (pos < 0) > Thanks for doing this work! Reviewed-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> Best regards, Sang-Heon Jeon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check 2026-09-10 16:29 ` Sang-Heon Jeon @ 2026-09-11 6:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2026-09-11 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sang-Heon Jeon Cc: Andrew Morton, Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Thomas Gleixner, Ryan Roberts, Thomas Weißschuh, Douglas Anderson, Huacai Chen, Mark Rutland, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:29:48 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 12:15 AM Masami Hiramatsu (Google) > <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > > > Sashiko reported that in get_boot_config_from_initrd(), a crafted initrd > > with a huge bootconfig size (such as 0xFFFFFFFF) can cause the pointer > > arithmetic: > > > > data = ((void *)hdr) - size; > > > > to wrap around on 32-bit systems (or when pointer subtraction overflows). > > Because data wraps around, the subsequent bounds check: > > > > if ((unsigned long)data < initrd_start) > > > > evaluates to false, bypassing the check. The kernel then calls > > xbc_calc_checksum(data, size), which attempts to read 4GB of memory, > > hitting unmapped pages and triggering a fatal kernel page fault during > > early boot. Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, an > > unbounded 32-bit size can similarly bypass the initrd_start check. > > > > Fix this by: > > 1. Ensuring the initrd is at least large enough to contain the bootconfig > > footer and verifying hdr is within the initrd bounds. > > 2. Checking that size does not exceed XBC_DATA_MAX and does not exceed > > the available space between initrd_start and hdr before performing > > pointer subtraction. > > > > Fixes: de462e5f1071 ("bootconfig: Fix to remove bootconfig data from initrd while boot") > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260910010137.EE0431F000FF@smtp.kernel.org/ > > Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > --- > > Changes in v4: > > - Accurate the error message for size > XBC_DATA_MAX in > > get_boot_config_from_initrd(). > > - Remove redundant (and wrong) size >= XBC_DATA_MAX check from > > setup_boot_config(). > > --- > > init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c > > index 2613d3f9b3ce..16749bb7a219 100644 > > --- a/init/main.c > > +++ b/init/main.c > > @@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) > > u8 *hdr; > > int i; > > > > - if (!initrd_end) > > + if (!initrd_end || initrd_end < initrd_start || > > + initrd_end - initrd_start < BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN + 8) > > return NULL; > > (nit) how about moving BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE from tools and using it instead? OK, that will be done in cleanup patch. > > > data = (char *)initrd_end - BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN; > > @@ -294,16 +295,26 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) > > > > found: > > hdr = (u8 *)(data - 8); > > + if ((unsigned long)hdr < initrd_start) > > + return NULL; > > + > > size = get_unaligned_le32(hdr); > > csum = get_unaligned_le32(hdr + 4); > > > > - data = ((void *)hdr) - size; > > - if ((unsigned long)data < initrd_start) { > > - pr_err("bootconfig size %d is greater than initrd size %ld\n", > > + if (size > XBC_DATA_MAX) { > > + pr_err("bootconfig size %u is greater than max size %d\n", > > + size, XBC_DATA_MAX); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > + if (size > ((unsigned long)hdr - initrd_start)) { > > + pr_err("bootconfig size %u is greater than initrd size %lu\n", > > size, initrd_end - initrd_start); > > return NULL; > > } > > > > + data = ((void *)hdr) - size; > > + > > if (xbc_calc_checksum(data, size) != csum) { > > pr_err("bootconfig checksum failed\n"); > > return NULL; > > @@ -394,12 +405,6 @@ static void __init setup_boot_config(void) > > return; > > } > > > > - if (size >= XBC_DATA_MAX) { > > - pr_err("bootconfig size %ld greater than max size %d\n", > > - (long)size, XBC_DATA_MAX); > > - return; > > - } > > - > > Nice cleanup! > > > ret = xbc_init(data, size, &msg, &pos); > > if (ret < 0) { > > if (pos < 0) > > > > Thanks for doing this work! > > Reviewed-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> > Thanks! -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-11 6:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-10 15:15 [PATCH v4 0/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow problems Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 2026-09-10 16:16 ` Sang-Heon Jeon 2026-09-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 2026-09-10 16:29 ` Sang-Heon Jeon 2026-09-11 6:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®