From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: mail@birger-koblitz.de
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
neuromoments@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 01/15] phylink: Add phylink_mac_interrupt
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 06:47:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178954124325.22033.15259491368067745017@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914-ax88179a-v11-1-5ea7a925ba6d@birger-koblitz.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
- [Medium] phylink_mac_interrupt() (drivers/net/phy/phylink.c:1621) reads
pl->phydev with a plain, unsynchronized load and immediately…
--
phylink: Add phylink_mac_interrupt
Adds an exported phylink_mac_interrupt() helper that forwards a link-change
interrupt received by the MAC to phylib via phy_mac_interrupt(), so that
drivers can avoid polling the PHY.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> index 3ec3bb4391095..96ed13458e9f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> @@ -1612,6 +1612,22 @@ static bool phylink_link_is_up(struct phylink *pl)
> return pl->netdev ? netif_carrier_ok(pl->netdev) : pl->old_link_state;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * phylink_mac_interrupt() - wrapper for phy_mac_interrupt()
> + * @pl: a pointer to a &struct phylink returned from phylink_create()
> + *
> + * Passes a link-change interrupt received by the MAC to phylib.
> + */
> +void phylink_mac_interrupt(struct phylink *pl)
> +{
> + struct phy_device *phy;
> +
> + phy = pl->phydev;
> + if (phy)
> + phy_mac_interrupt(phy);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phylink_mac_interrupt);
[Severity: Medium]
How is the read of pl->phydev in phylink_mac_interrupt() synchronized
against the writers?
Every other pl->phydev accessor in phylink.c either holds
pl->phydev_mutex (phylink_bringup_phy(), phylink_disconnect_phy(),
phylink_resolve()) or calls ASSERT_RTNL() (phylink_rx_clk_stop_block(),
phylink_ethtool_*(), phylink_mii_ioctl(), phylink_speed_up/down(),
phylink_prepare_resume()). The field itself carries the comment:
/* Serialize updates to pl->phydev with phylink_resolve() */
struct mutex phydev_mutex;
Since the kernel-doc says the helper is for a link-change interrupt, the
caller cannot take that sleeping mutex, so is the documented rule for this
field reachable through this API at all?
Also, the load is a plain load rather than READ_ONCE(). Can the compiler
re-materialize pl->phydev for the phy_mac_interrupt(phy) use after the
NULL test, so that a concurrent clear in phylink_disconnect_phy() ends up
in phy_mac_interrupt(NULL)? The dereference happens here:
drivers/net/phy/phy.c:phy_queue_state_machine() {
mod_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &phydev->state_queue,
jiffies);
}
There is a second question about teardown ordering, reachable with the
consumer added later in this series (ax88179a_status() calls
phylink_mac_interrupt() from URB completion context):
drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:usbnet_stop() {
...
if (info->stop) {
retval = info->stop(dev); /* -> phylink_stop() ->
phy_stop() ->
phy_stop_machine() */
...
usbnet_status_stop(dev); /* status URB killed only here */
}
phy_stop_machine() does cancel_delayed_work_sync(&phydev->state_queue).
If a status URB completion lands between info->stop and
usbnet_status_stop(), does phylink_mac_interrupt() re-arm
phydev->state_queue after that synchronous cancel and run the state
machine on an already stopped PHY?
Finally, phylink_disconnect_phy() clears pl->phydev under the mutex and
then calls phy_disconnect() outside it:
mutex_unlock(&pl->phydev_mutex);
if (phy) {
flush_work(&pl->resolve);
phy_disconnect(phy);
}
with no synchronize_irq(), refcount or RCU to exclude a reader that
already loaded the pointer. For a future caller that does not quiesce its
interrupt source before phylink_disconnect_phy(), can the lockless load
become a use-after-free on phydev->state_queue once phy_detach() ->
put_device() has dropped the last reference?
Would it help to document a calling-context and PHY-lifetime contract on
the new declaration in include/linux/phylink.h, i.e. that the caller must
mask and synchronize its interrupt before phylink_disconnect_phy(), and to
use READ_ONCE() for the pl->phydev load?
> diff --git a/include/linux/phylink.h b/include/linux/phylink.h
> index 1dda5c7ed5f14..f6c1db837fb50 100644
> --- a/include/linux/phylink.h
> +++ b/include/linux/phylink.h
> @@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ int phylink_ethtool_set_eee(struct phylink *link, struct ethtool_keee *eee);
> int phylink_mii_ioctl(struct phylink *, struct ifreq *, int);
> int phylink_speed_down(struct phylink *pl, bool sync);
> int phylink_speed_up(struct phylink *pl);
> +void phylink_mac_interrupt(struct phylink *pl);
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260914-ax88179a-v11-0-5ea7a925ba6d%40birger-koblitz.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 12:46 [PATCH net-next v11 00/15] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A-based chips Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 01/15] phylink: Add phylink_mac_interrupt Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 14:13 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 02/15] phylib: Add support for PHYs with broken forced mode Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 14:14 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 03/15] ax88179_178a: Fix endianness of pause watermark register Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 04/15] ax88179_178a: Split driver into library and device specific code Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 14:15 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 05/15] ax88179_178a: Add netdev2data() convenience function Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 06/15] ax88179_178a: Add HW support for AX179A-based chips Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 14:12 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-14 16:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-15 0:01 ` Birger Koblitz
2026-09-15 12:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-16 0:12 ` Birger Koblitz
2026-09-15 5:28 ` Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 07/15] ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A MACs Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 08/15] ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A PHYs Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 14:17 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 09/15] ax88179_178a: Add VLAN offload support for AX88179A Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 10/15] ax88179_178a: Add AX179A/AX279 multicast configuration Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 11/15] ax88179_178a: Add Suspend/resume support for AX88179A/772D/279 Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 12/15] ax88179_178a: Add ethtool get_drvinfo Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 14:16 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 13/15] ax88179_178a: Update driver name and information Birger Koblitz
2026-09-14 14:17 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 14/15] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A/772D/279 EEPROM access Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 12:46 ` [PATCH net-next v11 15/15] ax88796b: Add support for AX88772D, AX88179A and AX88279 Birger Koblitz
2026-09-16 6:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178954124325.22033.15259491368067745017@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mail@birger-koblitz.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neuromoments@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®