mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: tariqt@nvidia.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	erezsh@nvidia.com, gal@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	mbloch@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, kliteyn@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Replace kzalloc with kzalloc_obj
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 23:42:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178960215650.22033.278373355356901464@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915111912.3926585-4-tariqt@nvidia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1

- [Low] Commit message names the wrong helper and does not describe the
  actual (partial) scope of the change.

--

net/mlx5: HWS, Replace kzalloc with kzalloc_obj

This converts one allocation in hws_send_ring_alloc_sq() from an open-coded
kzalloc(sizeof(*p) * n, GFP_KERNEL) to the newer object-array allocation
macro.

>  net/mlx5: HWS, Replace kzalloc with kzalloc_obj
>
>  Replace kzalloc with the newer kzalloc_obj allocation function.

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug in the code, but does the changelog name the right helper?

The subject and body both say kzalloc_obj, while the only converted site
uses the array variant kzalloc_objs(). include/linux/slab.h defines these
as two separate macros:

  #define kzalloc_obj(P, ...) \
	__alloc_objs(kzalloc, default_gfp(__VA_ARGS__), typeof(P), 1)

  #define kzalloc_objs(P, COUNT, ...) \
	__alloc_objs(kzalloc, default_gfp(__VA_ARGS__), typeof(P), COUNT)

Grepping this patch for kzalloc_obj as written in the message finds nothing.

Also, the message reads as a general replacement sweep, but only this one
array allocation is converted.  The single-object kzalloc(sizeof(*x),
GFP_KERNEL) sites that kzalloc_obj would actually apply to are still present
in the same driver, for example in hws/bwc_complex.c:

	subm->bwc_matcher = kzalloc(sizeof(*subm->bwc_matcher), GFP_KERNEL);

as well as the cdata and sr_data allocations in the same file, and they
remain unconverted at the end of the series.  Could the message mention that
the conversion is limited to this call site?

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/send.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/send.c
> index 80cfd0ddba08b..49dee44d0bef5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/send.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/send.c
> @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static int hws_send_ring_alloc_sq(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
>  		goto destroy_wq_cyc;
>  	}
>  
> -	sq->wr_priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*sq->wr_priv) * buf_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	sq->wr_priv = kzalloc_objs(*sq->wr_priv, buf_sz);
>  	if (!sq->wr_priv) {
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto free_dep_wqe;

The expansion here looks equivalent to the old code, with default_gfp()
yielding GFP_KERNEL and __alloc_objs() using size_mul() for the product, so
no functional change is expected.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260915111912.3926585-1-tariqt%40nvidia.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-15 11:19 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/mlx5: more HWS misc enhancements Tariq Toukan
2026-09-15 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Return meaningful error code in hws_send_wqe_fw Tariq Toukan
2026-09-15 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Fix error message in mlx5hws_cmd_generate_wqe Tariq Toukan
2026-09-16 23:42   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Replace kzalloc with kzalloc_obj Tariq Toukan
2026-09-16 23:42   ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-15 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Add timeout mechanism to draining send queues Tariq Toukan
2026-09-16 23:42   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Handle timeout draining the send queue for FW STEs Tariq Toukan
2026-09-16 23:42   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net/mlx5: HWS, Remove unneeded WRITE_ONCE in post send Tariq Toukan
2026-09-16 23:42   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178960215650.22033.278373355356901464@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=erezsh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kliteyn@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®