* [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses
@ 2026-09-24 6:22 Hui Peng
2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 1/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in ca8210_rx_done() Hui Peng
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: h.morris, alex.aring, miquel.raynal, stefan
Cc: david.laight.linux, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, Hui Peng
This series fixes three out-of-bounds access bugs in the Cascoda CA8210
IEEE 802.15.4 driver:
1. Reject received SPI packets with len > sizeof(struct mac_message) in
ca8210_rx_done() instead of checking len > CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE (256),
preventing a stack buffer overflow when copying a synchronous response
into priv->sync_command_response (a struct mac_message on the caller's
stack) and matching the actual SPI transfer length
(cas_ctl->transfer.len = sizeof(struct mac_message)).
2. Initialize lenvar = 1 in ca8210_get_ed() and validate
hw_attribute_length against *hw_attribute_length in
hwme_get_request_sync() before memcpy() to prevent overflowing the
caller's stack buffer.
3. Validate the received SPI frame length len upfront at the start of
ca8210_skb_rx() before reading data_ind or allocating the skb.
Changes in v3:
- Patch 1/3: Check len > sizeof(struct mac_message) in ca8210_rx_done()
where dev_crit() logs "Received packet len (%u) erroneously long" and
drops the packet, instead of silently truncating the memcpy() with
min_t(), addressing David Laight's feedback.
Changes in v2:
- Split the ca8210 fixes into three single-issue patches (1/3..3/3) and
addressed Miquel Raynal's review comments on patches 2/3 and 3/3.
Hui Peng (3):
ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in ca8210_rx_done()
ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in
hwme_get_request_sync()
ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in
ca8210_skb_rx()
drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH net v3 1/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in ca8210_rx_done() 2026-09-24 6:22 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:22 ` Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 2/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in hwme_get_request_sync() Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() Hui Peng 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: h.morris, alex.aring, miquel.raynal, stefan Cc: david.laight.linux, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, Hui Peng In ca8210_spi_transfer(), each SPI transfer reads sizeof(struct mac_message) bytes into cas_ctl->tx_in_buf: cas_ctl->transfer.len = sizeof(struct mac_message); However, ca8210_rx_done() only checks the received packet length len = buf[1] + 2 against CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE (256). When buf[0] & SPI_SYN is set and priv->sync_command_response is non-NULL, memcpy() copies up to 256 bytes into priv->sync_command_response, which points to a struct mac_message object on the synchronous caller's stack, overflowing the stack buffer: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in ca8210_rx_done+0x117/0x6c0 Write of size 256 at addr ffff8881009e7c40 by task swapper/0/1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0 print_report+0x153/0x4c6 kasan_report+0xf1/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x125/0x200 __asan_memcpy+0x3c/0x60 ca8210_rx_done+0x117/0x6c0 ... This frame has 1 object: [32, 182) 'response' Check len > sizeof(struct mac_message) instead of len > CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE in ca8210_rx_done() so that any packet exceeding sizeof(struct mac_message) is logged as erroneously long via dev_crit() and dropped before copying into priv->sync_command_response or passing it to ca8210_net_rx(). Tested in QEMU with KASAN enabled by passing a 256-byte SPI_SYN response into ca8210_rx_done(). Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> --- Changes in v3: - Check len > sizeof(struct mac_message) at the top of ca8210_rx_done() where dev_crit() logs the error and drops the packet instead of silently truncating memcpy() with min_t(), addressing David Laight's feedback. Changes in v2: - Split the ca8210 fixes into three single-issue patches (1/3..3/3). drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c index 01af4f9..a990a0f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static void ca8210_rx_done(struct cas_control *cas_ctl) buf = cas_ctl->tx_in_buf; len = buf[1] + 2; - if (len > CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE) { + if (len > sizeof(struct mac_message)) { dev_crit( &priv->spi->dev, "Received packet len (%u) erroneously long\n", -- 2.49.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net v3 2/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in hwme_get_request_sync() 2026-09-24 6:22 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 1/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in ca8210_rx_done() Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:22 ` Hui Peng 2026-09-28 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() Hui Peng 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: h.morris, alex.aring, miquel.raynal, stefan Cc: david.laight.linux, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, Hui Peng In ca8210_get_ed(), an uninitialized u8 lenvar and a pointer to a 1-byte stack buffer (u8 *level) are passed to hwme_get_request_sync(), which unconditionally copies response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.hw_attribute_length bytes into hw_attribute_value without checking the caller's destination buffer capacity, overflowing level on the stack when hw_attribute_length exceeds 1: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hwme_get_request_sync.constprop.0.isra.0+0xf3/0x170 Write of size 16 at addr ffff888001907780 by task init/1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0 print_report+0x153/0x4c6 kasan_report+0xf1/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x125/0x200 __asan_memcpy+0x3c/0x60 hwme_get_request_sync.constprop.0.isra.0+0xf3/0x170 ca8210_get_ed+0x9c/0xf0 ... The buggy address belongs to stack of task init/1 and is located at offset 48 in frame: ca8210_get_ed+0x0/0xf0 This frame has 2 objects: [48, 49) 'level' [64, 65) 'lenvar' Initialize lenvar = 1 in ca8210_get_ed() and return IEEE802154_SYSTEM_ERROR in hwme_get_request_sync() if response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.hw_attribute_length exceeds *hw_attribute_length. Tested in QEMU with KASAN enabled by passing an oversized hw_attribute_length response into ca8210_get_ed(). Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> --- Changes in v3: - No changes. Changes in v2: - Split out as patch 2/3. - Replaced the temporary stack buffer in ca8210_get_ed() with lenvar = 1 and an upper-bound check against *hw_attribute_length in hwme_get_request_sync() as requested by Miquel Raynal. drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c index a990a0f..8aa7ffe 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c @@ -1677,6 +1677,9 @@ static u8 hwme_get_request_sync( return IEEE802154_SYSTEM_ERROR; if (response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.status == IEEE802154_SUCCESS) { + if (response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.hw_attribute_length > + *hw_attribute_length) + return IEEE802154_SYSTEM_ERROR; *hw_attribute_length = response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.hw_attribute_length; memcpy( @@ -2027,7 +2030,7 @@ static int ca8210_xmit_async(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb) */ static int ca8210_get_ed(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, u8 *level) { - u8 lenvar; + u8 lenvar = 1; struct ca8210_priv *priv = hw->priv; return link_to_linux_err( ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3 2/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in hwme_get_request_sync() 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 2/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in hwme_get_request_sync() Hui Peng @ 2026-09-28 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: netdev-bot+sashiko @ 2026-09-28 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: benquike Cc: h.morris, alex.aring, miquel.raynal, stefan, david.laight.linux, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, kuba Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case you want to address the nit picks below when you respin. Low priority / nit picks for your consideration: - [Low] The commit message reads as if the stack overflow in ca8210_get_ed()/hwme_get_request_sync() can happen at runtime. - [Low] The patch turns `hw_attribute_length` in hwme_get_request_sync() into an in/out parameter, but the kernel-doc was not updated. Pre-existing issues: - [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but it is a real memory-safety race in the same sync-exchange path. -- ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in hwme_get_request_sync() This patch initializes lenvar to 1 in ca8210_get_ed(). It also makes hwme_get_request_sync() return IEEE802154_SYSTEM_ERROR when the device reports an hw_attribute_length larger than the caller's buffer. The goal is to stop a stack overflow of the 1-byte level buffer in ca8210_get_ed(). > In ca8210_get_ed(), an uninitialized u8 lenvar and a pointer to a 1-byte > stack buffer (u8 *level) are passed to hwme_get_request_sync(), which > unconditionally copies response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.hw_attribute_length > bytes into hw_attribute_value without checking the caller's destination > buffer capacity, overflowing level on the stack when hw_attribute_length > exceeds 1: > > BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hwme_get_request_sync.constprop.0.isra.0+0xf3/0x170 > Write of size 16 at addr ffff888001907780 by task init/1 [ ... ] > Tested in QEMU with KASAN enabled by passing an oversized > hw_attribute_length response into ca8210_get_ed(). > > Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [Severity: Low] Can this overflow actually be reached at runtime? The commit message reads as if it describes live stack corruption. It shows a splat from task init/1 and carries a stable tag. hwme_get_request_sync() is static. Its only caller is ca8210_get_ed(), and ca8210_get_ed() is only referenced as the .ed callback in ca8210_phy_ops: .ed = ca8210_get_ed, As far as I can tell, mac802154 never calls ops->ed. The only reference is the NULL check in ieee802154_alloc_hw(): net/mac802154/main.c:ieee802154_alloc_hw() { ... if (WARN_ON(!ops || !(ops->xmit_async || ops->xmit_sync) || !ops->ed || ... } nl802154_trigger_scan() also accepts only NL802154_SCAN_ACTIVE and NL802154_SCAN_PASSIVE. So an energy-detection scan from userspace can't get there either. Even if there were a caller, the device would have to answer HWME_GET(HWME_EDVALUE) with hw_attribute_length > 1. Could the commit message say that the .ed op is not currently invoked, and that a misbehaving CA8210 would be needed? That would help maintainers choose between net and net-next, and decide whether a stable backport is needed. > diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > index a990a0f347ad..8aa7ffeb22d7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > @@ -1677,6 +1677,9 @@ static u8 hwme_get_request_sync( > return IEEE802154_SYSTEM_ERROR; > > if (response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.status == IEEE802154_SUCCESS) { > + if (response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.hw_attribute_length > > + *hw_attribute_length) > + return IEEE802154_SYSTEM_ERROR; [Severity: Low] Should the kernel-doc for hwme_get_request_sync() be updated too? *hw_attribute_length is now read as the size of hw_attribute_value, and then overwritten with the copied length. That makes it an in/out parameter. The comment still says: * @hw_attribute_length: Attribute length ... * Return: 802.15.4 status code of HWME-GET.confirm Before this patch the argument was only written, which is why ca8210_get_ed() could pass an uninitialized lenvar. A future caller that follows the kernel-doc and does the same would compare against a random value, and the overflow would come back. The only caller meets the new requirement with a bare "u8 lenvar = 1;". Nothing ties that 1 to sizeof(*level). The Return: text is now also wrong in one more case. This IEEE802154_SYSTEM_ERROR comes from the driver, not from the device's confirm, and link_to_linux_err() maps it to -EPROTO. Two older SYSTEM_ERROR returns had already made that text inaccurate. > *hw_attribute_length = > response.pdata.hwme_get_cnf.hw_attribute_length; > memcpy( [Severity: High] This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but there seems to be a race in the sync exchange path that this length check can't protect against. priv->sync_command_response is per-device state shared by all sync callers, and no lock covers it. ca8210_spi_exchange() publishes the caller's stack buffer, waits interruptibly with a timeout, and then clears the pointer: drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_spi_exchange() { ... if ((buf[0] & SPI_SYN) && response) { /* if sync wait for confirm */ reinit_completion(&priv->sync_exchange_complete); priv->sync_command_response = response; } ... cleanup: priv->sync_command_response = NULL; return status; } ca8210_rx_done() runs from the SPI completion callback ca8210_spi_transfer_complete(). It tests the pointer and then copies into it, with no lock: drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_rx_done() { ... if (buf[0] & SPI_SYN) { if (priv->sync_command_response) { memcpy(priv->sync_command_response, buf, len); complete(&priv->sync_exchange_complete); ... } Suppose the waiter gets -ERESTARTSYS or -ETIME after ca8210_rx_done() has loaded the non-NULL pointer but before the memcpy. Can that memcpy then write into the stack frame of a caller that has already returned from hwme_get_request_sync()? Sync exchanges also don't appear to be serialized. ca8210_mlme_reset_worker() calls mlme_reset_request_sync() from a workqueue without rtnl, and ca8210_rx_done() queues it on TRANSACTION_OVERFLOW. It can run at the same time as rtnl-held ieee802154_ops callbacks such as set_channel or set_txpower, which also use the *_request_sync() helpers. Could two callers overwrite each other's response pointer, or consume each other's completion? One caller would get the other command's confirm. The other would either time out or return with its response buffer untouched, because hwme_get_request_sync() doesn't preset command_id. Would it make sense to serialize sync exchanges with a mutex? The handoff of the response buffer would also need to be synchronized against ca8210_rx_done(). Ideally, the confirm ID would also be checked against the request that was issued. [ ... ] -- Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260924062244.2444225-1-benquike%40gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() 2026-09-24 6:22 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 1/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in ca8210_rx_done() Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 2/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in hwme_get_request_sync() Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:22 ` Hui Peng 2026-09-28 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: h.morris, alex.aring, miquel.raynal, stefan Cc: david.laight.linux, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, Hui Peng In ca8210_skb_rx(), data_ind is read at offsets 22 (msdulen), 23 (mpdulinkquality), 29 + msdulen (hdr.sec.level), 30..39 + msdulen (security header), and 29 .. 29 + msdulen (payload) without verifying that the received SPI frame length len covers those offsets, causing an out-of-bounds read when msdulen exceeds len - 30: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ca8210_skb_rx.constprop.0.isra.0+0x137/0x160 Read of size 64 at addr ffff888006453ddd by task init/1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0 print_report+0x153/0x4c6 kasan_report+0xf1/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x125/0x200 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 ca8210_skb_rx.constprop.0.isra.0+0x137/0x160 ca8210_net_rx+0x96/0xc0 ... The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888006453dc0 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32 The buggy address is located 29 bytes inside of allocated 32-byte region [ffff888006453dc0, ffff888006453de0) Consolidate all length and msdulen validations into a single upfront check at the beginning of ca8210_skb_rx() before allocating the skb. Tested in QEMU with KASAN enabled by passing a short data_ind buffer with msdulen = 64 and len = 30 into ca8210_skb_rx(). Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> --- Changes in v3: - No changes. Changes in v2: - Split out as patch 3/3. - Consolidated all length checks in ca8210_skb_rx() into a single place at the beginning of the function before dev_alloc_skb() and dropped the unrelated hdr.seq assignment as requested by Miquel Raynal. drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c index 8aa7ffe..ab245ad 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c @@ -1758,19 +1758,15 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( u8 *data_ind ) { - struct ieee802154_hdr hdr; + struct ieee802154_hdr hdr = { }; int msdulen; int hlen; - u8 mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; + u8 mpdulinkquality; struct sk_buff *skb; struct ca8210_priv *priv = hw->priv; - /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ - skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); - if (!skb) - return -ENOMEM; - - skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); + if (len < 30) + return -EMSGSIZE; msdulen = data_ind[22]; /* msdu_length */ if (msdulen > IEEE802154_MTU) { @@ -1778,9 +1774,25 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( &priv->spi->dev, "received erroneously large msdu length!\n" ); - kfree_skb(skb); return -EMSGSIZE; } + + if (len < 30 + msdulen || + (!priv->promiscuous && data_ind[29 + msdulen] > 0 && + len < 29 + msdulen + sizeof(struct secspec))) { + dev_err(&priv->spi->dev, + "received truncated data indication!\n"); + return -EMSGSIZE; + } + + mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; + + /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ + skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); + if (!skb) + return -ENOMEM; + + skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); dev_dbg(&priv->spi->dev, "skb buffer length = %d\n", msdulen); if (priv->promiscuous) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() Hui Peng @ 2026-09-28 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: netdev-bot+sashiko @ 2026-09-28 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: benquike Cc: h.morris, alex.aring, miquel.raynal, stefan, david.laight.linux, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, kuba Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider. Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 2 · Low: 1 If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong. If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply (one such reply per series is enough). - [High] ieee802154: ca8210: TOCTOU race on priv->promiscuous allows OOB read - [Medium] The commit message overstates the impact. - [Medium] The new upfront length check in ca8210_skb_rx() does not cover the first read of the MCPS-DATA.indication fields. - [Low] The patch changes `struct ieee802154_hdr hdr;` to `struct ieee802154_hdr hdr = { };` in ca8210_skb_rx()… -- ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() This patch moves the length checks in ca8210_skb_rx() to the start of the function, ahead of the skb allocation. It adds a minimum length check, a check that len covers the msdu, and a check that len covers the security header. It also zero-initialises the on-stack struct ieee802154_hdr. > In ca8210_skb_rx(), data_ind is read at offsets 22 (msdulen), 23 > (mpdulinkquality), 29 + msdulen (hdr.sec.level), 30..39 + msdulen > (security header), and 29 .. 29 + msdulen (payload) without verifying > that the received SPI frame length len covers those offsets, causing an > out-of-bounds read when msdulen exceeds len - 30: > > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ca8210_skb_rx.constprop.0.isra.0+0x137/0x160 > Read of size 64 at addr ffff888006453ddd by task init/1 [ ... ] > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888006453dc0 > which belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32 [Severity: Medium] Can the real driver produce this slab-out-of-bounds read? The only caller of ca8210_skb_rx() is ca8210_net_rx(), which gets its buffer from ca8210_rx_done(): drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_rx_done() { ... buf = cas_ctl->tx_in_buf; len = buf[1] + 2; ... ca8210_net_rx(priv->hw, buf, len); ... } ca8210_net_rx() then does: return ca8210_skb_rx(hw, len - 2, command + 2); tx_in_buf is a fixed u8 tx_in_buf[CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE] (256 bytes) that sits inside struct cas_control. It is memset to SPI_IDLE before each transfer. msdulen is already capped at IEEE802154_MTU (127). So the highest byte ca8210_skb_rx() can touch is tx_in_buf[2 + 39 + 127], which is inside the object. The kmalloc-32 splat seems to come from the test harness passing a 32-byte buffer directly into ca8210_skb_rx(). The underlying problem looks like missing validation of a truncated MCPS-DATA.indication, not a read outside the allocation. With Cc: stable attached, could the commit message describe the real impact more precisely, so stable and CVE triage are not misled? > diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > index 8aa7ffeb22d7..ab245add9ff5 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > @@ -1758,19 +1758,15 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( > u8 *data_ind > ) > { > - struct ieee802154_hdr hdr; > + struct ieee802154_hdr hdr = { }; [Severity: Low] This isn't a bug, but this change in behaviour isn't mentioned in the commit message. ieee802154_hdr_push() writes hdr->seq and the full 2-byte frame control into the skb: net/ieee802154/header_ops.c:ieee802154_hdr_push() { ... buf[pos++] = hdr->seq; ... memcpy(buf, fc, 2); memcpy(skb_push(skb, pos), buf, pos); ... } ca8210_skb_rx() never sets hdr.seq, fc.ack_request, fc.frame_pending, the reserved fc bits or sec.frame_counter. Before this patch, uninitialised stack bytes ended up in the reconstructed MAC header of every non-promiscuous received frame. After this patch those fields are always zero, so seq is 0 for every frame. The v2 changelog says the hdr.seq assignment was dropped as unrelated. Could this initialisation either get its own patch or be described in this commit message? Otherwise a backporter might drop it as unrelated and bring the stack data leak back. > int msdulen; > int hlen; > - u8 mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; > + u8 mpdulinkquality; > struct sk_buff *skb; > struct ca8210_priv *priv = hw->priv; > > - /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ > - skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); > - if (!skb) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); > + if (len < 30) > + return -EMSGSIZE; [Severity: Medium] This check runs only after the caller has already read and stored a data_ind field. Is the upfront validation complete? ca8210_rx_done() sets len = buf[1] + 2 and checks only an upper bound. ca8210_net_rx() then reads the DSN (data_ind[24]) before any length check: drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_net_rx() { ... if (command[0] == SPI_MCPS_DATA_INDICATION) { spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags); if (command[26] == priv->last_dsn) { ... return 0; } priv->last_dsn = command[26]; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags); return ca8210_skb_rx(hw, len - 2, command + 2); ... } Suppose the device sends a truncated indication with buf[1] < 25. Then command[26] is stale data or SPI_IDLE filler. It gets stored in priv->last_dsn, and ca8210_skb_rx() then rejects the frame with -EMSGSIZE. Wouldn't the next valid frame whose DSN matches that byte be silently dropped as a resend? Should the minimum length check move ahead of the command[26] access in ca8210_net_rx()? > > msdulen = data_ind[22]; /* msdu_length */ > if (msdulen > IEEE802154_MTU) { [ ... ] > @@ -1778,9 +1774,25 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( > &priv->spi->dev, > "received erroneously large msdu length!\n" > ); > - kfree_skb(skb); > return -EMSGSIZE; > } > + > + if (len < 30 + msdulen || > + (!priv->promiscuous && data_ind[29 + msdulen] > 0 && > + len < 29 + msdulen + sizeof(struct secspec))) { > + dev_err(&priv->spi->dev, > + "received truncated data indication!\n"); > + return -EMSGSIZE; > + } > + > + mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; > + > + /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ > + skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); > + if (!skb) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); > dev_dbg(&priv->spi->dev, "skb buffer length = %d\n", msdulen); > > if (priv->promiscuous) > [Severity: High] Can priv->promiscuous change between the new truncation check and the later promiscuous test that jumps to copy_payload? With this patch ca8210_skb_rx() reads priv->promiscuous twice. The first read decides whether the secspec length condition is applied. The second read decides whether the security header is parsed: hdr.sec.level = data_ind[29 + msdulen]; if (hdr.sec.level > 0) { hdr.sec.key_id_mode = data_ind[30 + msdulen]; memcpy(&hdr.sec.extended_src, &data_ind[31 + msdulen], 8); hdr.sec.key_id = data_ind[39 + msdulen]; } ca8210_set_promiscuous_mode() writes priv->promiscuous from the mac802154 .set_promiscuous_mode callback without taking priv->lock. ca8210_skb_rx() does not hold priv->lock either, because ca8210_net_rx() drops it before the call. The two reads are also separated by dev_alloc_skb() and dev_dbg(), so the compiler has to reload the field. Suppose promiscuous mode is switched off between the two reads, and the frame has len == 30 + msdulen and a non-zero security level. The frame passes the new check with the secspec condition skipped. It then falls through into the security header parsing, which reads data_ind[30 + msdulen] .. data_ind[39 + msdulen]. That is up to 10 bytes past len, and those stale bytes end up in the MAC header pushed onto the skb. This is exactly the access the new check is meant to prevent. Would it be better to sample the flag once, for example with a local bool promiscuous = READ_ONCE(priv->promiscuous) at the top of the function? That local could then be used for both the length check and the goto to copy_payload. -- Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260924062244.2444225-1-benquike%40gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses
@ 2026-09-22 9:30 Hui Peng
2026-09-22 9:30 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() Hui Peng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hui Peng @ 2026-09-22 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harry Morris, Alexander Aring, Miquel Raynal, Stefan Schmidt
Cc: Hui Peng, David Laight, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
This series fixes three out-of-bounds access bugs in the Cascoda CA8210
IEEE 802.15.4 driver:
1. Reject received SPI packets with len > sizeof(struct mac_message) in
ca8210_rx_done() instead of checking len > CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE (256),
preventing a stack buffer overflow when copying a synchronous response
into priv->sync_command_response (a struct mac_message on the caller's
stack) and matching the actual SPI transfer length
(cas_ctl->transfer.len = sizeof(struct mac_message)).
2. Initialize lenvar = 1 in ca8210_get_ed() and validate
hw_attribute_length against *hw_attribute_length in
hwme_get_request_sync() before memcpy() to prevent overflowing the
caller's stack buffer.
3. Validate the received SPI frame length len upfront at the start of
ca8210_skb_rx() before reading data_ind or allocating the skb.
Changes in v3:
- Patch 1/3: Check len > sizeof(struct mac_message) in ca8210_rx_done()
where dev_crit() logs "Received packet len (%u) erroneously long" and
drops the packet, instead of silently truncating the memcpy() with
min_t(), addressing David Laight's feedback.
Changes in v2:
- Split the ca8210 fixes into three single-issue patches (1/3..3/3) and
addressed Miquel Raynal's review comments on patches 2/3 and 3/3.
Hui Peng (3):
ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in ca8210_rx_done()
ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in
hwme_get_request_sync()
ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in
ca8210_skb_rx()
drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() 2026-09-22 9:30 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses Hui Peng @ 2026-09-22 9:30 ` Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hui Peng @ 2026-09-22 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harry Morris, Alexander Aring, Miquel Raynal, Stefan Schmidt Cc: Hui Peng, David Laight, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable In ca8210_skb_rx(), data_ind is read at offsets 22 (msdulen), 23 (mpdulinkquality), 29 + msdulen (hdr.sec.level), 30..39 + msdulen (security header), and 29 .. 29 + msdulen (payload) without verifying that the received SPI frame length len covers those offsets, causing an out-of-bounds read when msdulen exceeds len - 30: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ca8210_skb_rx.constprop.0.isra.0+0x137/0x160 Read of size 64 at addr ffff888006453ddd by task init/1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0 print_report+0x153/0x4c6 kasan_report+0xf1/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x125/0x200 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 ca8210_skb_rx.constprop.0.isra.0+0x137/0x160 ca8210_net_rx+0x96/0xc0 ... The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888006453dc0 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32 The buggy address is located 29 bytes inside of allocated 32-byte region [ffff888006453dc0, ffff888006453de0) Consolidate all length and msdulen validations into a single upfront check at the beginning of ca8210_skb_rx() before allocating the skb. Tested in QEMU with KASAN enabled by passing a short data_ind buffer with msdulen = 64 and len = 30 into ca8210_skb_rx(). Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> --- Changes in v3: - No changes. Changes in v2: - Split out as patch 3/3. - Consolidated all length checks in ca8210_skb_rx() into a single place at the beginning of the function before dev_alloc_skb() and dropped the unrelated hdr.seq assignment as requested by Miquel Raynal. drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c index 8aa7ffe..ab245ad 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c @@ -1758,19 +1758,15 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( u8 *data_ind ) { - struct ieee802154_hdr hdr; + struct ieee802154_hdr hdr = { }; int msdulen; int hlen; - u8 mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; + u8 mpdulinkquality; struct sk_buff *skb; struct ca8210_priv *priv = hw->priv; - /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ - skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); - if (!skb) - return -ENOMEM; - - skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); + if (len < 30) + return -EMSGSIZE; msdulen = data_ind[22]; /* msdu_length */ if (msdulen > IEEE802154_MTU) { @@ -1778,9 +1774,25 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( &priv->spi->dev, "received erroneously large msdu length!\n" ); - kfree_skb(skb); return -EMSGSIZE; } + + if (len < 30 + msdulen || + (!priv->promiscuous && data_ind[29 + msdulen] > 0 && + len < 29 + msdulen + sizeof(struct secspec))) { + dev_err(&priv->spi->dev, + "received truncated data indication!\n"); + return -EMSGSIZE; + } + + mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; + + /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ + skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); + if (!skb) + return -ENOMEM; + + skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); dev_dbg(&priv->spi->dev, "skb buffer length = %d\n", msdulen); if (priv->promiscuous) -- 2.49.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() 2026-09-22 9:30 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() Hui Peng @ 2026-09-24 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: netdev-bot+sashiko @ 2026-09-24 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: benquike Cc: h.morris, alex.aring, miquel.raynal, stefan, david.laight.linux, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, kuba Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider. Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 3 · Low: 0 (2) If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong. If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply (one such reply per series is enough). - [Medium] The commit message mischaracterises the defect: it pastes a KASAN "slab-out-of-bounds ... kmalloc-32 of size 32" report and… - [Medium] The patch silently changes 'struct ieee802154_hdr hdr;' to 'struct ieee802154_hdr hdr = { };' (ca8210.c:1761) without mentioning… - [Medium] The new consolidated validation in ca8210_skb_rx() gates the security-header length check on priv->promiscuous… Pre-existing issues: - [Low] ca8210_net_rx() reads command[26] (== data_ind[24], the DSN of an MCPS_DATA_INDICATION) and latches it into priv->last_dsn… - [Low] Concern (reported for completeness, assessed as not actionable): hdr is now explicitly zero-initialized and no path assigns hdr.seq,… -- ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() This moves all length and msdulen validation in ca8210_skb_rx() into a single check at the top of the function, before dev_alloc_skb(), and adds a new check that the reported SPI frame length covers the payload and the optional security header. The hdr declaration is also changed to be zero-initialized. A few questions below. > In ca8210_skb_rx(), data_ind is read at offsets 22 (msdulen), 23 > (mpdulinkquality), 29 + msdulen (hdr.sec.level), 30..39 + msdulen > (security header), and 29 .. 29 + msdulen (payload) without verifying > that the received SPI frame length len covers those offsets, causing an > out-of-bounds read when msdulen exceeds len - 30: > > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ca8210_skb_rx.constprop.0.isra.0+0x137/0x160 > Read of size 64 at addr ffff888006453ddd by task init/1 > ... > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888006453dc0 > which belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32 [Severity: Medium] Can this slab-out-of-bounds actually be reached from the driver's receive path? ca8210_skb_rx() has one caller chain: ca8210_spi_transfer_complete() -> ca8210_rx_done() -> ca8210_net_rx() -> ca8210_skb_rx(hw, len - 2, command + 2) and the buffer is always cas_ctl->tx_in_buf, a fixed array embedded in a kzalloc'd struct cas_control: drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c: struct cas_control { ... u8 tx_in_buf[CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE]; ... }; with CA8210_SPI_BUF_SIZE == 256, not a kmalloc-32 allocation. Since the pre-existing check caps msdulen at IEEE802154_MTU (127), the furthest byte the unpatched code can touch is data_ind[39 + 127] == tx_in_buf[168], and skb_put_data() copies tx_in_buf[31..157] — all inside the 256-byte array. The changelog's own note: > Tested in QEMU with KASAN enabled by passing a short data_ind buffer with > msdulen = 64 and len = 30 into ca8210_skb_rx(). suggests the splat came from a synthetic direct call on a 32-byte buffer rather than from the SPI receive path. On the real path the observable effect of the missing checks looks like stale SPI buffer bytes (idle fill 0xFF, or residue from a previous exchange) being copied into the skb and into hdr.sec, which is a data-integrity issue rather than memory corruption. Could the commit message describe the actual in-tree consequence, and could the Fixes:/Cc: stable rationale be restated accordingly so stable triage isn't misled by the pasted KASAN report? > diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > index 8aa7ffeb22d78..ab245add9ff5c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c > @@ -1758,19 +1758,15 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( > u8 *data_ind > ) > { > - struct ieee802154_hdr hdr; > + struct ieee802154_hdr hdr = { }; [Severity: Medium] Is this zero-initialization a separate fix that deserves a mention in the changelog? ieee802154_hdr_push() unconditionally emits the sequence octet and both frame control bytes: net/ieee802154/header_ops.c:ieee802154_hdr_push() { ... buf[pos++] = hdr->seq; ... memcpy(buf, fc, 2); memcpy(skb_push(skb, pos), buf, pos); } while ca8210_skb_rx() only assigns hdr.fc.type, hdr.fc.security_enabled, hdr.fc.intra_pan and the two address-mode fields, and never assigns hdr.seq, hdr.fc.version (outside the security path), hdr.fc.ack_request, hdr.fc.frame_pending or the reserved bits. Before this hunk those bytes were uninitialized stack data pushed into every reconstructed header handed to mac802154 via ieee802154_rx_irqsafe(); after it they are deterministic zeros. The only trace of this is below the --- line ("dropped the unrelated hdr.seq assignment"), which does not end up in the git log. Should the changelog describe this behaviour change, or should the hunk be split into its own patch? [Severity: Low] This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but with hdr now explicitly zeroed and no path assigning hdr.seq, every non-promiscuous frame is reported upstream with sequence number 0, even though the driver does read the real DSN from the same message in ca8210_net_rx(): if (command[26] == priv->last_dsn) { Previously the emitted octet was stack garbage, so this is unchanged in kind, and the v2 changelog records that wiring up hdr.seq was dropped at the maintainer's request. Noting it only so the intent is on record. > int msdulen; > int hlen; > - u8 mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; > + u8 mpdulinkquality; > struct sk_buff *skb; > struct ca8210_priv *priv = hw->priv; > > - /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ > - skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); > - if (!skb) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); > + if (len < 30) > + return -EMSGSIZE; [Severity: Low] This is a pre-existing issue, but the caller parses the same message with no minimum length at all, so the new "upfront" check is not the first parse of the frame: drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_rx_done() { buf = cas_ctl->tx_in_buf; len = buf[1] + 2; if (len > sizeof(struct mac_message)) { ... } drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_net_rx() { ... if (command[26] == priv->last_dsn) { ... priv->last_dsn = command[26]; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags); return ca8210_skb_rx(hw, len - 2, command + 2); } len is only bounded from above, so a data indication declaring buf[1] < 25 still has command[26] (== data_ind[24]) read and latched into priv->last_dsn before ca8210_skb_rx() gets to reject it. The read stays inside tx_in_buf, but the byte is idle fill or residue, so last_dsn can be poisoned and a later legitimate frame carrying that DSN is dropped as a resend. Would it make sense to also give ca8210_net_rx() a minimum length check for SPI_MCPS_DATA_INDICATION, so both parsers of this message format agree on its minimum size? > > msdulen = data_ind[22]; /* msdu_length */ > if (msdulen > IEEE802154_MTU) { > @@ -1778,9 +1774,25 @@ static int ca8210_skb_rx( > &priv->spi->dev, > "received erroneously large msdu length!\n" > ); > - kfree_skb(skb); > return -EMSGSIZE; > } > + > + if (len < 30 + msdulen || > + (!priv->promiscuous && data_ind[29 + msdulen] > 0 && > + len < 29 + msdulen + sizeof(struct secspec))) { > + dev_err(&priv->spi->dev, > + "received truncated data indication!\n"); > + return -EMSGSIZE; > + } [Severity: Medium] Can the two reads of priv->promiscuous disagree here? The security-header length check is gated on !priv->promiscuous above, but the decision to actually parse the security header is a second, independent read a few lines later: if (priv->promiscuous) goto copy_payload; /* Populate hdr */ hdr.sec.level = data_ind[29 + msdulen]; ... hdr.sec.key_id_mode = data_ind[30 + msdulen]; memcpy(&hdr.sec.extended_src, &data_ind[31 + msdulen], 8); hdr.sec.key_id = data_ind[39 + msdulen]; priv->promiscuous is a plain bool written without any lock, READ_ONCE() or barrier: drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_set_promiscuous_mode() { ... priv->promiscuous = on; } drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:ca8210_reset_send() { ... priv->promiscuous = false; } and ca8210_net_rx() drops priv->lock before calling ca8210_skb_rx(): spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags); return ca8210_skb_rx(hw, len - 2, command + 2); So if the flag reads true at the check and false at the use — for example a monitor-mode toggle from ca8210_set_promiscuous_mode() landing between the two — the "len < 29 + msdulen + sizeof(struct secspec)" branch is never evaluated, yet data_ind[29 + msdulen] through data_ind[39 + msdulen] are dereferenced. That reads up to 11 bytes past the end of the frame the length check validated (stale tx_in_buf contents), producing a fabricated hdr.sec or an ieee802154_hdr_push() failure and a dropped frame, which is the exact byte class this patch sets out to stop touching. Would taking one snapshot, e.g. bool promisc = READ_ONCE(priv->promiscuous); and using it for both the check and the parse decision, or validating the security-header length unconditionally, close that window? > + > + mpdulinkquality = data_ind[23]; > + > + /* Allocate mtu size buffer for every rx packet */ > + skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU + sizeof(hdr)); > + if (!skb) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(hdr)); > dev_dbg(&priv->spi->dev, "skb buffer length = %d\n", msdulen); > > if (priv->promiscuous) -- Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260922093126.141969-1-benquike%40gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-28 6:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-24 6:22 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 1/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in ca8210_rx_done() Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 2/3] ieee802154: ca8210: prevent stack buffer overflow in hwme_get_request_sync() Hui Peng 2026-09-28 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() Hui Peng 2026-09-28 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2026-09-22 9:30 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ieee802154: ca8210: fix stack and slab out-of-bounds accesses Hui Peng 2026-09-22 9:30 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ieee802154: ca8210: validate data_ind length upfront in ca8210_skb_rx() Hui Peng 2026-09-24 6:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®