* [PATCH net v7 1/4] net/smc: bound the wire-controlled producer cursor to the RMB
2026-10-13 20:12 [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
@ 2026-10-13 20:12 ` Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 2/4] net/smc: bound the receive length " Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay @ 2026-10-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Wythe, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet, Dust Li,
Mahanta Jambigi, Sidraya Jayagond, David S. Miller
Cc: netdev, Simon Horman, linux-kernel, Wenjia Zhang, Tony Lu,
linux-s390, Guangguan Wang, Ursula Braun, linux-rdma,
Stefan Raspl, Hidayath Khan, Wen Gu
From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
smcr_cdc_msg_to_host() and smcd_cdc_msg_to_host() import the peer's
producer cursor from the wire into conn->local_rx_ctrl.prod without
bounding it to the RMB. smc_cdc_handle_urg_data_arrival() then uses its
count as a raw index into the RMB, so a producer cursor past
rmb_desc->len makes the receive tasklet read past the RMB, and
recv(MSG_OOB) hands that byte to the application.
Bound the producer cursor count to rmb_desc->len when it comes off the
wire, for SMC-R and SMC-D. Leave the consumer cursor alone: it indexes
the peer's RMB, which can be larger than ours, so clamping it to our
RMB would under-credit peer_rmbe_space and could stall sending to that
peer. Conforming peers are unaffected.
Fixes: de8474eb9d50 ("net/smc: urgent data support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_cdc.h | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
index 696cc11f2303..4d630a305118 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
@@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ static inline void smc_host_msg_to_cdc(struct smc_cdc_msg *peer,
static inline void smc_cdc_cursor_to_host(union smc_host_cursor *local,
union smc_cdc_cursor *peer,
- struct smc_connection *conn)
+ struct smc_connection *conn,
+ int max_count)
{
union smc_host_cursor temp, old;
union smc_cdc_cursor net;
@@ -235,6 +236,12 @@ static inline void smc_cdc_cursor_to_host(union smc_host_cursor *local,
if ((old.wrap == temp.wrap) &&
(old.count > temp.count))
return;
+ /* The urgent path uses the producer count as a raw index into our
+ * RMB, so bound it. max_count == 0 leaves the consumer cursor alone:
+ * it indexes the peer's RMB, which can be larger than ours.
+ */
+ if (max_count && temp.count > max_count)
+ temp.count = max_count;
smc_curs_copy(local, &temp, conn);
}
@@ -246,8 +253,9 @@ static inline void smcr_cdc_msg_to_host(struct smc_host_cdc_msg *local,
local->len = peer->len;
local->seqno = ntohs(peer->seqno);
local->token = ntohl(peer->token);
- smc_cdc_cursor_to_host(&local->prod, &peer->prod, conn);
- smc_cdc_cursor_to_host(&local->cons, &peer->cons, conn);
+ smc_cdc_cursor_to_host(&local->prod, &peer->prod, conn,
+ conn->rmb_desc->len);
+ smc_cdc_cursor_to_host(&local->cons, &peer->cons, conn, 0);
local->prod_flags = peer->prod_flags;
local->conn_state_flags = peer->conn_state_flags;
}
@@ -260,6 +268,9 @@ static inline void smcd_cdc_msg_to_host(struct smc_host_cdc_msg *local,
temp.wrap = peer->prod.wrap;
temp.count = peer->prod.count;
+ /* as in smc_cdc_cursor_to_host(): bound prod, not cons */
+ if (temp.count > conn->rmb_desc->len)
+ temp.count = conn->rmb_desc->len;
smc_curs_copy(&local->prod, &temp, conn);
temp.wrap = peer->cons.wrap;
--
2.56.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH net v7 2/4] net/smc: bound the receive length to the RMB
2026-10-13 20:12 [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 1/4] net/smc: bound the wire-controlled producer cursor to the RMB Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
@ 2026-10-13 20:12 ` Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 3/4] net/smc: bound the send length to the send buffer in smc_tx_sendmsg() Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay @ 2026-10-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Wythe, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet, Dust Li,
Mahanta Jambigi, Sidraya Jayagond, David S. Miller
Cc: netdev, Simon Horman, linux-kernel, Wenjia Zhang, Tony Lu,
linux-s390, Guangguan Wang, Ursula Braun, linux-rdma,
Stefan Raspl, Hidayath Khan, Wen Gu
From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
smc_rx_recvmsg() sizes the copy from bytes_to_rcv and starts it past the
bytes MSG_PEEK or splice() already took. A forged producer cursor drives
bytes_to_rcv past the RMB or negative, and with a conforming peer it
drops below the peeked count when a MSG_PEEK|MSG_WAITALL reader sleeps
while another recv() consumes what it peeked. Either way the copy reads
past the RMB into the reader's buffer: the second chunk runs long, or
the start offset leaves the RMB, as smc_curs_add() wraps only once.
Make smc_rx_data_available() report at most what fits in the RMB behind
the peeked and spliced bytes, never a negative count, and use it for the
copy and the wait predicates. Cache the RMB length for the unlocked
wait, and drop released bytes from splice_pending before the consumer
cursor moves past them, so no reader counts them twice.
Fixes: 952310ccf2d8 ("smc: receive data from RMBE")
Fixes: 9014db202cb7 ("smc: add support for splice()")
Fixes: a4b6539038c1 ("net/smc: fix data error when recvmsg with MSG_PEEK flag")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008-b4-disp-f7cd3d96-v6-0-fba616c0920c@proton.me?part=2
Closes: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261008-b4-disp-f7cd3d96-v6-0-fba616c0920c%40proton.me?part=2
Closes: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261008-b4-disp-f7cd3d96-v6-0-fba616c0920c%40proton.me?part=1
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
---
The wait predicates run unlocked, where a link group termination may
already have freed rmb_desc, hence the cached length. With the old
splice_pending order, a reader that took the lock between the cursor
update and the drop counted the bytes twice, and the next splice()
returned stale bytes in place of unread data. 1/4 bounds the producer
count, but wrap bumps still grow bytes_to_rcv past the RMB (see the
cover).
---
net/smc/smc.h | 3 +++
net/smc/smc_core.c | 1 +
net/smc/smc_rx.c | 7 ++++++-
net/smc/smc_rx.h | 11 ++++++++++-
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
index 427b6d63b993..d4325a0a8fd8 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc.h
@@ -203,6 +203,9 @@ struct smc_connection {
* rmbe
*/
int rtoken_idx; /* idx to peer RMB rkey/addr */
+ int rmb_len; /* rmb_desc->len, still valid
+ * after rmb_desc is freed
+ */
struct smc_buf_desc *sndbuf_desc; /* send buffer descriptor */
struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc; /* RMBE descriptor */
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 9974149659c2..8829517299de 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -2503,6 +2503,7 @@ static int __smc_buf_create(struct smc_sock *smc, bool is_smcd, bool is_rmb)
if (is_rmb) {
conn->rmb_desc = buf_desc;
+ conn->rmb_len = buf_desc->len;
conn->rmbe_size_comp = bufsize_comp;
smc->sk.sk_rcvbuf = bufsize * 2;
atomic_set(&conn->bytes_to_rcv, 0);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_rx.c b/net/smc/smc_rx.c
index 197fddc6271f..c968ac874d8b 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_rx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_rx.c
@@ -118,15 +118,20 @@ static void smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
struct smc_connection *conn = &priv->smc->conn;
struct smc_sock *smc = priv->smc;
struct sock *sk = &smc->sk;
+ bool drained;
lock_sock(sk);
if (conn->freed) {
release_sock(sk);
goto out;
}
+ /* drop the released bytes from splice_pending before cons moves
+ * past them, so no reader counts them twice
+ */
+ drained = atomic_sub_and_test(priv->len, &conn->splice_pending);
smc_rx_update_cons(smc, priv->len);
release_sock(sk);
- if (atomic_sub_and_test(priv->len, &conn->splice_pending))
+ if (drained)
smc_rx_wake_up(sk);
out:
kfree(priv);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_rx.h b/net/smc/smc_rx.h
index 994f5e42d1ba..6bf44e3cc33a 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_rx.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_rx.h
@@ -25,7 +25,16 @@ int smc_rx_wait(struct smc_sock *smc, long *timeo, size_t peeked,
int (*fcrit)(struct smc_connection *conn, size_t baseline));
static inline int smc_rx_data_available(struct smc_connection *conn, size_t peeked)
{
- return atomic_read(&conn->bytes_to_rcv) - peeked;
+ int avail = atomic_read(&conn->bytes_to_rcv);
+
+ /* bytes_to_rcv follows the peer's producer cursor and can be past
+ * the RMB or negative. Report no more than fits in the RMB behind the
+ * bytes already spliced or peeked. Compare before subtracting: near
+ * INT_MIN, avail - peeked wraps. This also runs unlocked, possibly
+ * after rmb_desc was freed, hence rmb_len.
+ */
+ avail = min(avail, conn->rmb_len - atomic_read(&conn->splice_pending));
+ return avail > (int)peeked ? avail - (int)peeked : 0;
}
#endif /* SMC_RX_H */
--
2.56.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH net v7 3/4] net/smc: bound the send length to the send buffer in smc_tx_sendmsg()
2026-10-13 20:12 [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 1/4] net/smc: bound the wire-controlled producer cursor to the RMB Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 2/4] net/smc: bound the receive length " Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
@ 2026-10-13 20:12 ` Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 4/4] net/smc: bound the link failover cursor advance to the send buffer Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:16 ` [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers netdev-bot+sinfo
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay @ 2026-10-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Wythe, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet, Dust Li,
Mahanta Jambigi, Sidraya Jayagond, David S. Miller
Cc: netdev, Simon Horman, linux-kernel, Wenjia Zhang, Tony Lu,
linux-s390, Guangguan Wang, Ursula Braun, linux-rdma,
Stefan Raspl, Hidayath Khan, Wen Gu
From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
conn->sndbuf_space can run past the send buffer. After an SMC-R link
failover, a late completion from the old link can move tx_curs_fin back,
and the next completion credits the same bytes again; across the ring
end, smc_curs_diff() credits the step back itself as more than a whole
ring, so even with a conforming peer sndbuf_space can reach three times
the buffer. The failover catch-up and SMC-D DMB merge (only the loopback
device today) also credit it from the peer's consumer cursor without a
bound. smc_tx_sendmsg() takes it as the write space, and the second
chunk of its copy writes past the send buffer.
Clamp writespace, which sizes the copy, to sndbuf_desc->len, negative
values included, so the copy stays in the send buffer.
Fixes: c6f02ebeea3a ("net/smc: switch connections to alternate link")
Fixes: cc0ab806fc52 ("net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>
---
This keeps the copy inside the send buffer but does not undo the
over-credit, so after such a failover send() can still overwrite data in
the buffer that the peer has not received yet (by inspection; not
tested). Fixing the credit in smc_cdc_tx_handler() needs a cursor
compare that survives the u16 wrap rollover, which smc_curs_comp() does
not do, so it is left out here. A negative value maps to len, not 0,
since 0 would make the send loop spin.
---
net/smc/smc_tx.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
index 3144b4b1fe29..58d9dfdcdf33 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
@@ -233,6 +233,14 @@ int smc_tx_sendmsg(struct smc_sock *smc, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
/* initialize variables for 1st iteration of subsequent loop */
/* could be just 1 byte, even after smc_tx_wait above */
writespace = atomic_read(&conn->sndbuf_space);
+ /* sndbuf_space can be out of range: late completions of an
+ * old SMC-R link credit it again after a failover, and with
+ * SMC-D DMB merge it follows the peer's consumer cursor.
+ * Bound writespace, which sizes the copy; a negative value
+ * would become huge in the size_t min_t() below.
+ */
+ if (writespace < 0 || writespace > conn->sndbuf_desc->len)
+ writespace = conn->sndbuf_desc->len;
/* not more than what user space asked for */
copylen = min_t(size_t, send_remaining, writespace);
/* determine start of sndbuf */
--
2.56.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH net v7 4/4] net/smc: bound the link failover cursor advance to the send buffer
2026-10-13 20:12 [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 3/4] net/smc: bound the send length to the send buffer in smc_tx_sendmsg() Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
@ 2026-10-13 20:12 ` Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-13 20:16 ` [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers netdev-bot+sinfo
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay @ 2026-10-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Wythe, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet, Dust Li,
Mahanta Jambigi, Sidraya Jayagond, David S. Miller
Cc: netdev, Simon Horman, linux-kernel, Wenjia Zhang, Tony Lu,
linux-s390, Guangguan Wang, Ursula Braun, linux-rdma,
Stefan Raspl, Hidayath Khan, Wen Gu
From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
On SMC-R link failover, smc_switch_cursor() rewinds the send and
producer cursors to their values at the last completed CDC send, then
advances them by however far the peer's consumer cursor is ahead. That
cursor comes from the wire, so a forged one adds an arbitrary amount to
sndbuf_space and to the cursors. smc_curs_add() wraps them only once, so
the next RDMA write can take its source past the send buffer and its
destination past the peer's RMB.
A conforming peer keeps its cursor count inside its RMB and cannot
consume past the data in the send buffer. Advance only for such a count,
and no further than tx_curs_prep. The pre-failover tx_curs_sent cannot
be the bound: an earlier failover may have rewound it below the peer's
cursor.
Fixes: c6f02ebeea3a ("net/smc: switch connections to alternate link")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
---
Bounding the copy in smc_tx_sendmsg() (3/4) does not cover this: the
RDMA write takes its offsets from the cursors.
---
net/smc/smc_core.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 8829517299de..36aee89e5f5f 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static int smc_switch_cursor(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_cdc_tx_pend *pend,
struct smc_wr_buf *wr_buf)
{
struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn;
- union smc_host_cursor cons, fin;
+ union smc_host_cursor cons, fin, prep;
int rc = 0;
int diff;
@@ -1043,12 +1043,18 @@ static int smc_switch_cursor(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_cdc_tx_pend *pend,
/* set prod cursor to old state, enforce tx_rdma_writes() */
smc_curs_copy(&conn->local_tx_ctrl.prod, &fin, conn);
smc_curs_copy(&cons, &conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons, conn);
+ smc_curs_copy(&prep, &conn->tx_curs_prep, conn);
- if (smc_curs_comp(conn->peer_rmbe_size, &cons, &fin) < 0) {
+ if (cons.count < conn->peer_rmbe_size &&
+ smc_curs_comp(conn->peer_rmbe_size, &cons, &fin) < 0) {
/* cons cursor advanced more than fin, and prod was set
- * fin above, so now prod is smaller than cons. Fix that.
+ * fin above, so now prod is smaller than cons. cons comes
+ * off the wire: catch up only for a count inside the peer's
+ * RMB and no further than the data in the send buffer.
*/
- diff = smc_curs_diff(conn->peer_rmbe_size, &fin, &cons);
+ diff = min(smc_curs_diff(conn->peer_rmbe_size, &fin, &cons),
+ smc_curs_diff(conn->sndbuf_desc->len,
+ &conn->tx_curs_sent, &prep));
smc_curs_add(conn->sndbuf_desc->len,
&conn->tx_curs_sent, diff);
smc_curs_add(conn->sndbuf_desc->len,
--
2.56.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers
2026-10-13 20:12 [PATCH net v7 0/4] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-10-13 20:12 ` [PATCH net v7 4/4] net/smc: bound the link failover cursor advance to the send buffer Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
@ 2026-10-13 20:16 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sinfo @ 2026-10-13 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hexlabsecurity
Cc: D. Wythe, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet, Dust Li,
Mahanta Jambigi, Sidraya Jayagond, David S. Miller, netdev,
Simon Horman, linux-kernel, Wenjia Zhang, Tony Lu, linux-s390,
Guangguan Wang, Ursula Braun, linux-rdma, Stefan Raspl,
Hidayath Khan, Wen Gu
Hi!
This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:
- How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
analysis tool scan.
Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.
The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread