* [PATCH net] seg6: fix tun_src RCU lifetime on namespace teardown
@ 2026-10-23 19:52 Tristan Madani
2026-10-23 19:54 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-27 7:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Madani @ 2026-10-23 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Mayer, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, David Lebrun, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, Tristan Madani
From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
seg6_net_exit() frees tun_src directly, but set_tun_src() in
seg6_iptunnel.c reads it under rcu_read_lock(). The pointer may
be freed while a concurrent reader is still accessing it.
Add a pre_exit callback to clear the tun_src pointer before the
implied synchronize_rcu_expedited(), so all RCU readers complete
before the actual kfree in the exit callback. Save the original
pointer in tun_src_old so exit can free it after the grace period,
since the RCU pointer is already NULL at that point. The init
error path frees tun_src directly since pre_exit has not run.
Fixes: 915d7e5e5930 ("ipv6: sr: add code base for control plane support of SR-IPv6")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
---
include/net/seg6.h | 1 +
net/ipv6/seg6.c | 12 +++++++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/seg6.h b/include/net/seg6.h
index 82b3fbbcbb935..210f4fa0d4dd7 100644
--- a/include/net/seg6.h
+++ b/include/net/seg6.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static inline void update_csum_diff16(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 *from,
struct seg6_pernet_data {
struct mutex lock;
struct in6_addr __rcu *tun_src;
+ struct in6_addr *tun_src_old;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC
struct rhashtable hmac_infos;
#endif
diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6.c b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
index 8c2b156c227a7..670052290e43c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/seg6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
@@ -447,18 +447,28 @@ static int __net_init seg6_net_init(struct net *net)
return 0;
}
+static void __net_exit seg6_net_pre_exit(struct net *net)
+{
+ struct seg6_pernet_data *sdata = seg6_pernet(net);
+
+ /* Save tun_src for exit to free after the RCU grace period. */
+ sdata->tun_src_old = rcu_dereference_raw(sdata->tun_src);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(sdata->tun_src, NULL);
+}
+
static void __net_exit seg6_net_exit(struct net *net)
{
struct seg6_pernet_data *sdata = seg6_pernet(net);
seg6_hmac_net_exit(net);
- kfree(rcu_dereference_raw(sdata->tun_src));
+ kfree(sdata->tun_src_old);
kfree(sdata);
}
static struct pernet_operations ip6_segments_ops = {
.init = seg6_net_init,
+ .pre_exit = seg6_net_pre_exit,
.exit = seg6_net_exit,
};
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] seg6: fix tun_src RCU lifetime on namespace teardown
2026-10-23 19:52 [PATCH net] seg6: fix tun_src RCU lifetime on namespace teardown Tristan Madani
@ 2026-10-23 19:54 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
[not found] ` <20261025222222.1064464-1-tristan@talencesecurity.com>
2026-10-27 7:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sinfo @ 2026-10-23 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Madani
Cc: Andrea Mayer, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, David Lebrun, netdev, linux-kernel,
stable, Tristan Madani
Hi!
This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:
- How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
analysis tool scan.
- Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
(e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.
The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] seg6: fix tun_src RCU lifetime on namespace teardown
2026-10-23 19:52 [PATCH net] seg6: fix tun_src RCU lifetime on namespace teardown Tristan Madani
2026-10-23 19:54 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
@ 2026-10-27 7:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sashiko @ 2026-10-27 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tristmd
Cc: andrea.mayer, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, david.lebrun,
netdev, linux-kernel, stable, tristan
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider.
Critical: 1 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
(one such reply per series is enough).
- [Critical] The patch adds a reachable NULL pointer dereference on the
seg6 datapath during netns teardown.
--
seg6: fix tun_src RCU lifetime on namespace teardown
This patch adds a pre_exit callback to seg6 pernet ops. The callback
saves the per-netns tun_src pointer in a new tun_src_old field and then
clears the RCU pointer. The exit callback frees tun_src_old after the
grace period that runs between pre_exit and exit.
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6.c b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
> index 8c2b156c227a7..670052290e43c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/seg6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
> @@ -447,18 +447,28 @@ static int __net_init seg6_net_init(struct net *net)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void __net_exit seg6_net_pre_exit(struct net *net)
> +{
> + struct seg6_pernet_data *sdata = seg6_pernet(net);
> +
> + /* Save tun_src for exit to free after the RCU grace period. */
> + sdata->tun_src_old = rcu_dereference_raw(sdata->tun_src);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(sdata->tun_src, NULL);
[Severity: Critical]
Can this cause a NULL pointer dereference in set_tun_src() while the
netns is being torn down?
set_tun_src() in net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c assumes tun_src is never NULL.
If the route has no per-route tunsrc configured (the default), it does:
rcu_read_lock();
tun_src = rcu_dereference(sdata->tun_src);
if (!ipv6_addr_any(tun_src)) {
memcpy(saddr, tun_src, sizeof(struct in6_addr));
ipv6_addr_any() dereferences its argument in both config variants, so a
NULL tun_src faults there.
In ops_undo_list(), all pre_exit callbacks run first. After that comes
synchronize_rcu_expedited(), then ops_exit_rtnl_list(), then
ops_exit_list(). The netns devices are unregistered later, in
default_device_exit_batch() during the exit phase. That means the dying
netns keeps its registered devices and seg6 lwtunnel routes after
seg6_net_pre_exit() has published NULL.
A packet that arrives in that window, for example from a veth peer in a
live netns or from a physical NIC, would follow:
seg6_input_core() / seg6_output_core()
-> seg6_do_srh()
-> seg6_do_srh_encap() / seg6_do_srh_encap_red() / seg6_do_srh_inline()
-> set_tun_src()
-> ipv6_addr_any(NULL)
This runs in softirq or xmit context. The grace period does not close
the window, because it only waits for readers that already exist.
Readers that load the pointer after the clear still see NULL.
Before this patch, tun_src was never NULL between init and exit. Would
it be better to leave the pointer in place and keep the kfree() in
seg6_net_exit()? By the time exit runs, a grace period has already
passed.
seg6_genl_get_tunsrc() also passes the pointer to nla_put() without a
NULL check. That path is probably not reachable on a dying netns, since
a genl socket holds a netns reference.
> +}
> +
> static void __net_exit seg6_net_exit(struct net *net)
> {
> struct seg6_pernet_data *sdata = seg6_pernet(net);
>
> seg6_hmac_net_exit(net);
>
> - kfree(rcu_dereference_raw(sdata->tun_src));
> + kfree(sdata->tun_src_old);
> kfree(sdata);
> }
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261023195234.3524462-1-tristmd%40gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-27 7:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-23 19:52 [PATCH net] seg6: fix tun_src RCU lifetime on namespace teardown Tristan Madani
2026-10-23 19:54 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
[not found] ` <20261025222222.1064464-1-tristan@talencesecurity.com>
2026-10-26 14:05 ` Andrea Mayer
2026-10-26 14:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-10-27 7:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®