From: Chaosheng Qu <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
To: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v7 2/4] can: j1939: validate the EDPO packet number
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 09:34:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179410166345.60581.5430129940541091934@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179410166344.60581.3898011861151549156@163.com>
From 4fca2aa63eeaefe7f14a6b1c5b9a3b67a2439c98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chaosheng Qu <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 09:22:29 +0800
Subject: [PATCH net v7 2/4] can: j1939: validate the EDPO packet number
ETP.CM_DPO is peer controlled and its packet number is accepted without any
validation. It names the packet a transmission window starts at, and
j1939_xtp_rx_dat_one() places incoming data at "dat[0] - 1 + pkt.dpo", so a
value past the end of the message moves pkt.dpo beyond the reassembled
buffer.
The transfer still completes normally in that case. With
pkt.dpo == pkt.total, a closing ETP.DT frame with dat[0] == 0 evaluates to
packet pkt.total - 1, which is the last in-order packet, so pkt.rx reaches
pkt.total and the receiver emits its own EOMA. The local loopback of that
EOMA runs j1939_session_completed(), which asks j1939_session_skb_get() for
offset "pkt.dpo * 7" -- one full packet past the end of the queued skb --
gets NULL, and passes it straight to j1939_sk_recv(), which dereferences
oskb->sk.
Reject an EDPO that names a packet at or past pkt.total and abort the
session. The check has to be ">=" and not ">": pkt.total is a packet
count,
so the last valid packet is pkt.total - 1.
The abort code depends on the role. A receiver rejects a bad offset with
J1939_XTP_ABORT_BAD_EDPO_OFFSET, which the comment next to the definition
describes as "Bad EDPO offset" and which had no callers. A transmitter
only
builds an EDPO from pkt.tx_acked, which comes from the responder's
ETP.CM_CTS, so an out-of-range value there is an oversized CTS and is
reported as J1939_XTP_ABORT_ECTS_TOO_BIG.
Bounding the CTS packet number in j1939_xtp_rx_cts_one() is a separate
change; this one only stops the value from being used as an offset.
Signed-off-by: Chaosheng Qu <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
---
net/can/j1939/transport.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
index 590a04c453b5..b0e62822b56e 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
@@ -1849,14 +1849,43 @@ static void j1939_xtp_rx_dpo_one(struct j1939_session *session,
struct sk_buff *skb)
{
const u8 *dat = skb->data;
+ unsigned int dpo;
if (j1939_xtp_rx_cmd_bad_pgn(session, skb))
return;
netdev_dbg(session->priv->ndev, "%s: 0x%p\n", __func__, session);
+ dpo = j1939_etp_ctl_to_packet(dat);
+
+ /* ETP.CM_DPO is peer controlled. j1939_xtp_rx_dat_one() places data at
+ * "dat[0] - 1 + pkt.dpo", so a value at or past pkt.total moves pkt.dpo
+ * beyond the reassembled buffer. The transfer still completes: with
+ * pkt.dpo == pkt.total a closing ETP.DT with dat[0] == 0 evaluates to
+ * the last in-order packet, so pkt.rx reaches pkt.total and the receiver
+ * emits its own EOMA. The loopback of that EOMA runs
+ * j1939_session_completed(), which asks j1939_session_skb_get() for a
+ * packet past the end of the queued skb, gets NULL, and passes it to
+ * j1939_sk_recv().
+ *
+ * pkt.total is a packet count, so the last valid packet is
+ * pkt.total - 1 and the check has to be ">=".
+ */
+ if (dpo >= session->pkt.total) {
+ if (session->transmission) {
+ /* A transmitter only builds an EDPO from pkt.tx_acked,
+ * which comes from the responder's ETP.CM_CTS, so an
+ * out-of-range value there is an oversized CTS.
+ */
+ j1939_session_cancel(session, J1939_XTP_ABORT_ECTS_TOO_BIG);
+ } else {
+ j1939_session_cancel(session, J1939_XTP_ABORT_BAD_EDPO_OFFSET);
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
/* transmitted without problems */
- session->pkt.dpo = j1939_etp_ctl_to_packet(skb->data);
+ session->pkt.dpo = dpo;
session->last_cmd = dat[0];
j1939_tp_set_rxtimeout(session, 750);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 1:34 [PATCH net v7 0/4] can: j1939: fix the abort timer and bound EDPO Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-08 1:34 ` Chaosheng Qu [this message]
2026-11-12 21:49 ` [PATCH net v7 2/4] can: j1939: validate the EDPO packet number netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:11 ` Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-08 1:34 ` [PATCH net v7 3/4] can: j1939: drop the message when the reassembled skb is gone Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-12 21:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:11 ` Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-13 7:25 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-11-13 8:54 ` Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-08 1:34 ` [PATCH net v7 1/4] can: j1939: arm the abort timer under the session list lock Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-12 21:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:11 ` Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-08 1:34 ` [PATCH net v7 4/4] can: j1939: reject a CTS that names more packets than the message has Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-12 21:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:11 ` Chaosheng Qu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179410166345.60581.5430129940541091934@163.com \
--to=quchaosheng000406@163.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robin@protonic.nl \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®