From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix detach call without attach
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:48:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17b43cb8-1543-48d2-830a-b9f6dd50fc15@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230921-dsi-detach-fix-v1-1-d0de2d1621d9@ideasonboard.com>
Hi mipi dsi maintainers (I'm not sure who that is =),
On 21/09/2023 13:50, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> It's been reported that DSI host driver's detach can be called without
> the attach ever happening:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412073954.20601-1-tony@atomide.com/
>
> After reading the code, I think this is what happens:
>
> We have a DSI host defined in the device tree and a DSI peripheral under
> that host (i.e. an i2c device using the DSI as data bus doesn't exhibit
> this behavior).
>
> The host driver calls mipi_dsi_host_register(), which causes (via a few
> functions) mipi_dsi_device_add() to be called for the DSI peripheral. So
> now we have a DSI device under the host, but attach hasn't been called.
>
> Normally the probing of the devices continues, and eventually the DSI
> peripheral's driver will call mipi_dsi_attach(), attaching the
> peripheral.
>
> However, if the host driver's probe encounters an error after calling
> mipi_dsi_host_register(), and before the peripheral has called
> mipi_dsi_attach(), the host driver will do cleanups and return an error
> from its probe function. The cleanups include calling
> mipi_dsi_host_unregister().
>
> mipi_dsi_host_unregister() will call two functions for all its DSI
> peripheral devices: mipi_dsi_detach() and mipi_dsi_device_unregister().
> The latter makes sense, as the device exists, but the former may be
> wrong as attach has not necessarily been done.
>
> To fix this, track the attached state of the peripheral, and only detach
> from mipi_dsi_host_unregister() if the peripheral was attached.
>
> Note that I have only tested this with a board with an i2c DSI
> peripheral, not with a "pure" DSI peripheral.
>
> However, slightly related, the unregister machinery still seems broken.
> E.g. if the DSI host driver is unbound, it'll detach and unregister the
> DSI peripherals. After that, when the DSI peripheral driver unbound
> it'll call detach either directly or using the devm variant, leading to
> a crash. And probably the driver will crash if it happens, for some
> reason, to try to send a message via the DSI bus.
>
> But that's another topic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
Any comments? I can push this via drm-misc, but I'd like an ack.
Tomi
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> index 14201f73aab1..843a6dbda93a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,8 @@ static int mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn(struct device *dev, void *priv)
> {
> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(dev);
>
> - mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
> + if (dsi->attached)
> + mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
> mipi_dsi_device_unregister(dsi);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -370,11 +371,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_host_unregister);
> int mipi_dsi_attach(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> {
> const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->host->ops;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!ops || !ops->attach)
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> - return ops->attach(dsi->host, dsi);
> + ret = ops->attach(dsi->host, dsi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + dsi->attached = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_attach);
>
> @@ -386,9 +394,14 @@ int mipi_dsi_detach(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> {
> const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->host->ops;
>
> + if (WARN_ON(!dsi->attached))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (!ops || !ops->detach)
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> + dsi->attached = false;
> +
> return ops->detach(dsi->host, dsi);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_detach);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> index c9df0407980c..c0aec0d4d664 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
> * struct mipi_dsi_device - DSI peripheral device
> * @host: DSI host for this peripheral
> * @dev: driver model device node for this peripheral
> + * @attached: the DSI device has been successfully attached
> * @name: DSI peripheral chip type
> * @channel: virtual channel assigned to the peripheral
> * @format: pixel format for video mode
> @@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
> struct mipi_dsi_device {
> struct mipi_dsi_host *host;
> struct device dev;
> + bool attached;
>
> char name[DSI_DEV_NAME_SIZE];
> unsigned int channel;
>
> ---
> base-commit: 9fc75c40faa29df14ba16066be6bdfaea9f39ce4
> change-id: 20230921-dsi-detach-fix-6736f7a48ba7
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-21 10:50 Tomi Valkeinen
2023-09-21 11:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-09-21 18:33 ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-09-22 11:47 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2023-12-06 12:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2023-12-06 12:59 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17b43cb8-1543-48d2-830a-b9f6dd50fc15@ideasonboard.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®