From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix detach call without attach
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:35:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230921113545.GR5285@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230921-dsi-detach-fix-v1-1-d0de2d1621d9@ideasonboard.com>
* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> [230921 10:51]:
> mipi_dsi_host_unregister() will call two functions for all its DSI
> peripheral devices: mipi_dsi_detach() and mipi_dsi_device_unregister().
> The latter makes sense, as the device exists, but the former may be
> wrong as attach has not necessarily been done.
>
> To fix this, track the attached state of the peripheral, and only detach
> from mipi_dsi_host_unregister() if the peripheral was attached.
>
> Note that I have only tested this with a board with an i2c DSI
> peripheral, not with a "pure" DSI peripheral.
Thanks this fixes the deferred probe warning I've been seeing:
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-21 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-21 10:50 Tomi Valkeinen
2023-09-21 11:35 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2023-09-21 18:33 ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-09-22 11:47 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2023-12-06 12:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2023-12-06 12:59 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230921113545.GR5285@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®