From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"Alexander E . Patrakov" <patrakov@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX 3/9] ACPI, DOCK: clean up unused module related code
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:26:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1841512.D0ScSNfNgy@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371141152-9468-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
On Friday, June 14, 2013 12:32:26 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> ACPI dock driver can't be built as a module any more, so clean up
> module related code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
How exactly does this depend on [2/9]? If it doesn't at all, it should go
after [1/9].
> ---
> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 41 -----------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> index 79c8d9e..50e38b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(immediate_undock, "1 (default) will cause the driver to "
>
> static struct atomic_notifier_head dock_notifier_list;
>
> -static const struct acpi_device_id dock_device_ids[] = {
> - {"LNXDOCK", 0},
> - {"", 0},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dock_device_ids);
> -
Don't we actually need the device IDs?
> struct dock_station {
> acpi_handle handle;
> unsigned long last_dock_time;
> @@ -1013,30 +1007,6 @@ err_unregister:
> }
>
> /**
> - * dock_remove - free up resources related to the dock station
> - */
> -static int dock_remove(struct dock_station *ds)
> -{
> - struct dock_dependent_device *dd, *tmp;
> - struct platform_device *dock_device = ds->dock_device;
> -
> - if (!dock_station_count)
> - return 0;
> -
> - /* remove dependent devices */
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dd, tmp, &ds->dependent_devices, list)
> - kfree(dd);
> -
> - list_del(&ds->sibling);
> -
> - /* cleanup sysfs */
> - sysfs_remove_group(&dock_device->dev.kobj, &dock_attribute_group);
> - platform_device_unregister(dock_device);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * find_dock_and_bay - look for dock stations and bays
> * @handle: acpi handle of a device
> * @lvl: unused
> @@ -1073,14 +1043,3 @@ int __init acpi_dock_init(void)
> ACPI_DOCK_DRIVER_DESCRIPTION, dock_station_count);
> return 0;
> }
> -
> -static void __exit dock_exit(void)
> -{
> - struct dock_station *tmp, *dock_station;
> -
> - unregister_acpi_bus_notifier(&dock_acpi_notifier);
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dock_station, tmp, &dock_stations, sibling)
> - dock_remove(dock_station);
> -}
> -
> -module_exit(dock_exit);
The other changes look OK to me.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-13 16:32 [BUGFIX 0/9] Fix bug 59501 and code improvement for dock driver Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 1/9] ACPI, DOCK: initialize dock subsystem before scanning PCI root buses Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 18:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 2/9] ACPIPHP: fix device destroying order issue when handling dock notification Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 12:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 12:30 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 16:58 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 13:57 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 15:30 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 23:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 13:53 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 3/9] ACPI, DOCK: clean up unused module related code Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-06-13 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 14:04 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 4/9] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 5/9] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock device object Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 14:05 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 6/9] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 7/9] ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device() Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 8/9] ACPI: introduce several helper functions Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 9/9] ACPI: use new helper functions to simpilify code Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 17:34 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-13 18:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 17:43 ` [BUGFIX 0/9] Fix bug 59501 and code improvement for dock driver Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-13 18:26 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-13 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-13 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 19:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 2:06 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 3:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 3:57 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 2:09 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 2:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 2:40 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 2:51 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 3:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 3:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 3:56 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 3:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 4:07 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 4:14 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 4:43 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 5:11 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1841512.D0ScSNfNgy@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=patrakov@gmail.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®