From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"Alexander E . Patrakov" <patrakov@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX 5/9] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock device object
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:16:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2066328.eBboj8Iu4P@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BB233B.3040009@gmail.com>
On Friday, June 14, 2013 10:05:47 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 02:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, June 14, 2013 12:32:28 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> All dock device related data structures are created during driver
> >> initialization, so kill the redundant spin lock in dock device object.
> >
> > As a cleanup, it definitely makes sense, but does it fix anything?
> >
> > Rafael
> Patch 3-9 are code cleanup only, I will resend them as separate patchset
> later.
Cool, thanks!
Rafael
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> >> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 15 +++------------
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> >> index 8e578aa..cd2d5df 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> >> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct dock_station {
> >> acpi_handle handle;
> >> unsigned long last_dock_time;
> >> u32 flags;
> >> - spinlock_t dd_lock;
> >> struct mutex hp_lock;
> >> struct task_struct *owner;
> >> struct list_head dependent_devices;
> >> @@ -107,10 +106,7 @@ add_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
> >> dd->handle = handle;
> >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->list);
> >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->hotplug_list);
> >> -
> >> - spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
> >> list_add_tail(&dd->list, &ds->dependent_devices);
> >> - spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> @@ -168,14 +164,10 @@ find_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
> >> {
> >> struct dock_dependent_device *dd;
> >>
> >> - spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
> >> - list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list) {
> >> - if (handle == dd->handle) {
> >> - spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
> >> + list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list)
> >> + if (handle == dd->handle)
> >> return dd;
> >> - }
> >> - }
> >> - spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
> >> +
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -964,7 +956,6 @@ static int __init dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
> >> dock_station->last_dock_time = jiffies - HZ;
> >>
> >> mutex_init(&dock_station->hp_lock);
> >> - spin_lock_init(&dock_station->dd_lock);
> >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->sibling);
> >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->hotplug_devices);
> >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->dependent_devices);
> >>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-14 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-13 16:32 [BUGFIX 0/9] Fix bug 59501 and code improvement for dock driver Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 1/9] ACPI, DOCK: initialize dock subsystem before scanning PCI root buses Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 18:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 2/9] ACPIPHP: fix device destroying order issue when handling dock notification Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 12:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 12:30 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 16:58 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 13:57 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 15:30 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 23:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 13:53 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 3/9] ACPI, DOCK: clean up unused module related code Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 14:04 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 4/9] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 5/9] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock device object Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 14:05 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 6/9] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 7/9] ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device() Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 8/9] ACPI: introduce several helper functions Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 9/9] ACPI: use new helper functions to simpilify code Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 17:34 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-13 18:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 17:43 ` [BUGFIX 0/9] Fix bug 59501 and code improvement for dock driver Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-13 18:26 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-13 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-13 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 19:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 2:06 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 3:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 3:57 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 2:09 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 2:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 2:40 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 2:51 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 3:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 3:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 3:56 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 3:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 4:07 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 4:14 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
2013-06-14 4:43 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-14 5:11 ` Jiang Liu (Gerry)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2066328.eBboj8Iu4P@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=patrakov@gmail.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®