mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
@ 2014-07-19 21:56 Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-07-19 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ACPI Devel Maling List; +Cc: Linux PM list, Linux Kernel Mailing List

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI_HANDLE() macro evaluates ACPI_COMPANION() internally to
return the handle of the device's ACPI companion, so it is much
more straightforward and efficient to use ACPI_COMPANION()
directly to obtain the device's ACPI companion object instead of
using ACPI_HANDLE() and acpi_bus_get_device() on the returned
handle for the same thing.

Do that in three places in the ACPI device PM code.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

On top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4589941/

---
 drivers/acpi/device_pm.c |   21 +++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
@@ -558,7 +558,6 @@ static int acpi_dev_pm_get_state(struct
  */
 int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct device *dev, int *d_min_p, int d_max_in)
 {
-	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
 	struct acpi_device *adev;
 	int ret, d_min, d_max;
 
@@ -573,8 +572,9 @@ int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct de
 			d_max_in = ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT;
 	}
 
-	if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev)) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI handle without context in %s!\n", __func__);
+	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+	if (!adev) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI companion missing in %s!\n", __func__);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
@@ -664,15 +664,13 @@ static void acpi_device_pm_event(acpi_ha
 int acpi_pm_device_run_wake(struct device *phys_dev, bool enable)
 {
 	struct acpi_device *adev;
-	acpi_handle handle;
 
 	if (!device_run_wake(phys_dev))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(phys_dev);
-	if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev)) {
-		dev_dbg(phys_dev, "ACPI handle without context in %s!\n",
-			__func__);
+	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(phys_dev);
+	if (!adev) {
+		dev_dbg(phys_dev, "ACPI companion missing in %s!\n", __func__);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
@@ -692,16 +690,15 @@ static inline void acpi_device_pm_event(
  */
 int acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(struct device *dev, bool enable)
 {
-	acpi_handle handle;
 	struct acpi_device *adev;
 	int error;
 
 	if (!device_can_wakeup(dev))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
-	if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev)) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI handle without context in %s!\n", __func__);
+	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+	if (!adev) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI companion missing in %s!\n", __func__);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-07-19 21:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-19 21:56 [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() instead of ACPI_HANDLE() Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®