Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for HSM core on TI K3 SoCs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 05/01/2026 06:56, Padhi, Beleswar wrote:
> 
> On 1/2/2026 6:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 10:21:00PM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
>>> Some of the TI K3 family of SoCs have a HSM (High Security Module) M4F
>>> core in the Wakeup Voltage Domain which could be used to run secure
>>> services like Authentication. Add the device tree bindings document for
>>> this HSM M4F core.
>>>
>>> The added example illustrates the DT node for the HSM core present on K3
>>> J722S SoC.
>> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings for". The
>> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
>> See also:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-hsm-rproc.yaml  | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-hsm-rproc.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-hsm-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-hsm-rproc.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000000..f61e4046843af
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-hsm-rproc.yaml
>> Filename must match the compatible. Are you sure you are following
>> internal TI guidelines? Did you read them?
> 
> 
> Will address all comments in v2. Most of these issues exist with other
> upstreamed TI dt-bindings as well, will send out a separate cleanup
> series for those too.

This was not my question. Are you following carefully internal TI
guidelines to avoid common mistakes?


Best regards,
Krzysztof