* [PATCH] devlink: use devlink lock on DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_SPLIT
@ 2022-02-21 13:33 Niels Dossche
2022-02-22 4:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Niels Dossche @ 2022-02-21 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Pirko; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
devlink_nl_cmd_port_split_doit is executed without taking the devlink
instance lock. This function calls to devlink_port_get_from_info, which
calls devlink_port_get_from_attrs, which calls
devlink_port_get_by_index, which accesses devlink->port_list without the
instance lock taken, while in other places devlink->port_list access
always happens with the instance lock taken. The documentation in the
struct also say that the devlink lock protects the port_list.
The flag for no locking was added after refactoring the code to no
longer use a global lock.
Fixes: 2406e7e546b2 ("devlink: Add per devlink instance lock")
Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <niels.dossche@ugent.be>
---
net/core/devlink.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index fcd9f6d85cf1..563becaa03a6 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -8645,7 +8645,6 @@ static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,
.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_port_split_doit,
.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK,
},
{
.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_UNSPLIT,
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] devlink: use devlink lock on DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_SPLIT
2022-02-21 13:33 [PATCH] devlink: use devlink lock on DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_SPLIT Niels Dossche
@ 2022-02-22 4:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-02-22 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Niels Dossche; +Cc: Jiri Pirko, netdev, linux-kernel
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 14:33:25 +0100 Niels Dossche wrote:
> devlink_nl_cmd_port_split_doit is executed without taking the devlink
> instance lock. This function calls to devlink_port_get_from_info, which
> calls devlink_port_get_from_attrs, which calls
> devlink_port_get_by_index, which accesses devlink->port_list without the
> instance lock taken, while in other places devlink->port_list access
> always happens with the instance lock taken. The documentation in the
> struct also say that the devlink lock protects the port_list.
>
> The flag for no locking was added after refactoring the code to no
> longer use a global lock.
>
> Fixes: 2406e7e546b2 ("devlink: Add per devlink instance lock")
> Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <niels.dossche@ugent.be>
You can't do this, driver will likely try to register ports and try
to re-acquire the same lock. I have a series queued to fix this by
moving the locking into drivers. I'll send it out this week.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-22 5:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-21 13:33 [PATCH] devlink: use devlink lock on DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_SPLIT Niels Dossche
2022-02-22 4:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®