Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Shikra CQ2390M SoM platform

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 5/27/26 3:32 PM, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> On 5/25/2026 6:46 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 5/22/26 8:02 PM, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>>> Add device tree include for the CQ2390M variant of the Shikra
>>> System-on-Module, a compact compute module integrating the Shikra SoC
>>> and PMIC for IoT applications, designed to mount on carrier boards.
>>>
>>>    - shikra-cqm-som.dtsi: Retail SoM with modem (PM4125 and PM8005 PMIC)
>>>
>>> The DTSI includes the common shikra.dtsi, adds PM4125 and PM8005 PMIC
>>> regulator definitions specific to this variant.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---

[...]

>>> +&pm8005_regulators {
>>> +    status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>> ?
> 
> Already there's an ongoing discussion over the thread [1].
> PM8005 regulators are controlled by rpmpd so it's not expected to be enabled here.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260525093453.edmqryggp5kcqxxy@hu-kotarake-hyd.qualcomm.com/

Right. Downstream, MSM8998 (the other user) binds it to the GFX CPR,
which probably has the benefit lower latency than if it were to go
through RPM (although I was sorta hoping this would be an instance
of cargo cult that we could just rip out..).

If you add /omit-if-no-ref/ above the definition of the pm8005_regulators
node in pm8005.dtsi, does it get correctly skipped (i.e. if you do
dtc -I dtb shikra.dtb -O dts | grep qcom,pm8005-regulators, is is there)?

Konrad