From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 14/18] x86/resctrl: Fill out rmid_read structure for smp_call*() to read a counter
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:31:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19565646-074d-4c53-aa30-2b6145429666@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610183528.349198-15-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 6/10/24 11:35 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> mon_event_read() fills out most fields of the struct rmid_read that is
> passed via an smp_call*() function to a CPU that is part of the correct
> domain to read the monitor counters.
>
> With Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode there are now two cases to handle:
>
> 1) Reading a file that returns a value for a single domain.
> + Choose the CPU to execute from the domain cpu_mask
>
> 2) Reading a file that must sum across domains sharing an L3 cache
> instance.
> + Indicate to called code that a sum is needed by passing a NULL
> rdt_mon_domain pointer.
> + Choose the CPU from the L3 shared_cpu_map.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
The kerneldoc in patch #9 introduces new requirements related to
struct rmid_read wrt how NULL values are interpreted and
used. This makes it essential that struct rmid_read is always initialized
correctly and should no longer consist of whatever is on the stack. I
mentioned in response to v19 that static checkers found issues here.
I understand that mbm_update() always sets the domain in
struct rmid_read, but I do not find it acceptable that it
passes garbage as the cacheinfo pointer based on subtle assumptions on
when/how __mon_event_count() uses this field.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 77da29ced7eb..75bb1afc4842 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ void mon_event_count(void *info);
> int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg);
> void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
> struct rdt_mon_domain *d, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
> - int evtid, int first);
> + cpumask_t *cpumask, int evtid, int first);
> void mbm_setup_overflow_handler(struct rdt_mon_domain *dom,
> unsigned long delay_ms,
> int exclude_cpu);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> index 3b9383612c35..5a43931fd423 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int smp_mon_event_count(void *arg)
>
> void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
> struct rdt_mon_domain *d, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
> - int evtid, int first)
> + cpumask_t *cpumask, int evtid, int first)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
> return;
> }
>
> - cpu = cpumask_any_housekeeping(&d->hdr.cpu_mask, RESCTRL_PICK_ANY_CPU);
> + cpu = cpumask_any_housekeeping(cpumask, RESCTRL_PICK_ANY_CPU);
>
> /*
> * cpumask_any_housekeeping() prefers housekeeping CPUs, but
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
> * counters on some platforms if its called in IRQ context.
> */
> if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
> - smp_call_function_any(&d->hdr.cpu_mask, mon_event_count, rr, 1);
> + smp_call_function_any(cpumask, mon_event_count, rr, 1);
> else
> smp_call_on_cpu(cpu, smp_mon_event_count, rr, false);
>
> @@ -575,16 +575,39 @@ int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> resid = md.u.rid;
> domid = md.u.domid;
> evtid = md.u.evtid;
> -
> r = &rdt_resources_all[resid].r_resctrl;
> - hdr = rdt_find_domain(&r->mon_domains, domid, NULL);
> - if (!hdr || WARN_ON_ONCE(hdr->type != RESCTRL_MON_DOMAIN)) {
> +
> + if (md.u.sum) {
> + /*
> + * This file requires summing across all SNC domains that share
> + * the L3 cache id that was provided in the "domid" field of the
> + * mon_data_bits union. Search all domains in the resource for
> + * one that matches this cache id.
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &r->mon_domains, hdr.list) {
> + if (d->ci->id == domid) {
> + rr.ci = d->ci;
> + mon_event_read(&rr, r, NULL, rdtgrp, &d->ci->shared_cpu_map, evtid, false);
Please split this line, it is over 100
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 18:35 [PATCH v20 00/18] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 01/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new domain scope Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 02/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare to split rdt_domain structure Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 03/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for different scope for control/monitor operations Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 04/18] x86/resctrl: Split the rdt_domain and rdt_hw_domain structures Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:14 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 05/18] x86/resctrl: Add node-scope to the options for feature scope Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 06/18] x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache Tony Luck
2024-06-17 22:36 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-18 22:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-19 14:43 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-20 21:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 07/18] x86/resctrl: Block use of mba_MBps mount option on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-20 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-20 22:12 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21 1:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 15:24 ` Tony Luck
2024-06-21 17:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 08/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 09/18] x86/resctrl: Add a new field to struct rmid_read for summation of domains Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-20 22:42 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21 1:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 16:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21 17:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 10/18] x86/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() with a helper function Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 11/18] x86/resctrl: Allocate a new field in union mon_data_bits Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 12/18] x86/resctrl: Create Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 13/18] x86/resctrl: Handle removing directories in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 14/18] x86/resctrl: Fill out rmid_read structure for smp_call*() to read a counter Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:31 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 15/18] x86/resctrl: Make __mon_event_count() handle sum domains Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 16/18] x86/resctrl: Enable RMID shared RMID mode on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 17/18] x86/resctrl: Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) detection Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 17:05 ` Markus Elfring
2024-06-21 17:14 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 18/18] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-13 19:17 ` [PATCH v20 00/18] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Moger, Babu
2024-06-13 20:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-13 21:02 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-14 16:27 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 16:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-14 21:29 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 21:40 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-14 22:31 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 23:11 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-17 14:06 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19565646-074d-4c53-aa30-2b6145429666@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®