From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 12/18] x86/resctrl: Create Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:30:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <407b1851-9d19-4d44-ac73-677a75ae22e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610183528.349198-13-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 6/10/24 11:35 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> When SNC mode is enabled, create subdirectories and files to monitor
> at the SNC node granularity. Legacy behavior is preserved by tagging
> the monitor files at the L3 granularity with the "sum" attribute.
> When the user reads these files the kernel will read monitor data
> from all SNC nodes that share the same L3 cache instance and return
> the aggregated value to the user.
>
> Note that the "domid" field for files that must sum across SNC domains
> has the L3 cache instance id, while non-summing files use the domain id.
>
> The "sum" files do not need to make a call to mon_event_read() to
> initialize the MBM counters. This will be handled by initializing the
> individual SNC nodes that share the L3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 66acbad1c585..fc7f3f139800 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -3022,7 +3022,8 @@ static void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r,
> }
>
> static int mon_add_all_files(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> - struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdtgroup *prgrp)
> + struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdtgroup *prgrp,
> + bool do_sum)
> {
> union mon_data_bits priv;
> struct mon_evt *mevt;
> @@ -3033,14 +3034,15 @@ static int mon_add_all_files(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> return -EPERM;
>
> priv.u.rid = r->rid;
> - priv.u.domid = d->hdr.id;
> + priv.u.domid = do_sum ? d->ci->id : d->hdr.id;
> + priv.u.sum = do_sum;
> list_for_each_entry(mevt, &r->evt_list, list) {
> priv.u.evtid = mevt->evtid;
> ret = mon_addfile(kn, mevt->name, priv.priv);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (is_mbm_event(mevt->evtid))
> + if (!do_sum && is_mbm_event(mevt->evtid))
> mon_event_read(&rr, r, d, prgrp, mevt->evtid, true);
> }
>
> @@ -3051,23 +3053,51 @@ static int mkdir_mondata_subdir(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
> struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdtgroup *prgrp)
> {
> - struct kernfs_node *kn;
> + struct kernfs_node *kn, *ckn;
> char name[32];
> - int ret;
> + bool snc_mode;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> - sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", r->name, d->hdr.id);
> - /* create the directory */
> - kn = kernfs_create_dir(parent_kn, name, parent_kn->mode, prgrp);
> - if (IS_ERR(kn))
> - return PTR_ERR(kn);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>
> - ret = rdtgroup_kn_set_ugid(kn);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_destroy;
> + snc_mode = r->mon_scope != RESCTRL_L3_CACHE;
I think that testing that it _should_ be of particular scope will be
easier to understand than testing what it should not be. Can this instead
be a positive check of:
snc_mode = r->mon_scope == RESCTRL_L3_NODE;
> + sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", r->name, d->ci->id);
I find this to be too subtle and potentially confusing since it uses
d->ci->id interchangeable for both SNC and non-SNC mode. I understand
that in non-SNC mode the domain id will be the same as the cache id
but I would prefer that the code use the data structures as intended
instead of relying backdoor on assumptions. Something like:
sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", r->name, snc_mode ? d->ci->id : d->hdr.id);
> + kn = kernfs_find_and_get(parent_kn, name);
> + if (kn) {
> + /*
> + * rdtgroup_mutex will prevent this directory from being
> + * removed. No need to keep this hold.
> + */
> + kernfs_put(kn);
> + } else {
> + kn = kernfs_create_dir(parent_kn, name, parent_kn->mode, prgrp);
> + if (IS_ERR(kn))
> + return PTR_ERR(kn);
>
> - ret = mon_add_all_files(kn, d, r, prgrp);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_destroy;
> + ret = rdtgroup_kn_set_ugid(kn);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_destroy;
> + ret = mon_add_all_files(kn, d, r, prgrp, snc_mode);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_destroy;
> + }
> +
> + if (snc_mode) {
> + sprintf(name, "mon_sub_%s_%02d", r->name, d->hdr.id);
> + ckn = kernfs_create_dir(kn, name, parent_kn->mode, prgrp);
> + if (IS_ERR(ckn)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_destroy;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rdtgroup_kn_set_ugid(ckn);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_destroy;
> +
> + ret = mon_add_all_files(ckn, d, r, prgrp, false);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_destroy;
> + }
>
> kernfs_activate(kn);
> return 0;
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 18:35 [PATCH v20 00/18] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 01/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new domain scope Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 02/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare to split rdt_domain structure Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 03/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for different scope for control/monitor operations Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 04/18] x86/resctrl: Split the rdt_domain and rdt_hw_domain structures Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:14 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 05/18] x86/resctrl: Add node-scope to the options for feature scope Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 06/18] x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache Tony Luck
2024-06-17 22:36 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-18 22:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-19 14:43 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-20 21:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 07/18] x86/resctrl: Block use of mba_MBps mount option on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-20 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-20 22:12 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21 1:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 15:24 ` Tony Luck
2024-06-21 17:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 08/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 09/18] x86/resctrl: Add a new field to struct rmid_read for summation of domains Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-20 22:42 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21 1:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 16:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21 17:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 10/18] x86/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() with a helper function Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 11/18] x86/resctrl: Allocate a new field in union mon_data_bits Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 12/18] x86/resctrl: Create Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:30 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 13/18] x86/resctrl: Handle removing directories in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 14/18] x86/resctrl: Fill out rmid_read structure for smp_call*() to read a counter Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 15/18] x86/resctrl: Make __mon_event_count() handle sum domains Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 16/18] x86/resctrl: Enable RMID shared RMID mode on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 17/18] x86/resctrl: Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) detection Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 17:05 ` Markus Elfring
2024-06-21 17:14 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 18/18] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-13 19:17 ` [PATCH v20 00/18] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Moger, Babu
2024-06-13 20:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-13 21:02 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-14 16:27 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 16:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-14 21:29 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 21:40 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-14 22:31 ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 23:11 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-17 14:06 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=407b1851-9d19-4d44-ac73-677a75ae22e3@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®