mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Edward Tandi <ed@efix.biz>, azarah@nosferatu.za.org
Cc: perex@suse.cz, alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Linux Kernel Mailing Lists <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Love <rml@ximian.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Stan Bubrouski <stan@ccs.neu.edu>
Subject: Re: OSS sound emulation broken between 2.6.0-test2 and test3
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:35:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1960000.1072550125@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1072525450.3794.8.camel@wires.home.biz>

>> > Something appears to have broken OSS sound emulation between 
>> > test2 and test3. Best I can tell (despite the appearance of the BK logs), 
>> > that included ALSA updates 0.9.5 and 0.9.6. Hopefully someone who
>> > understands the sound architecture better than I can fix this?
>> > 
>> 
>> I wont say I understand it, but a quick look seems the major change is
>> the addition of the 'whole-frag' and 'no-silence' opts.  You might try
>> the following to revert what 'no-silence' change at least does:
>> 
>> --
>>  # echo 'xmms 0 0 no-silence' > /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss
>>  # echo 'xmms 0 0 whole-frag' > /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss
>> --
> 
> Thanks, that fixes it for me. I too have been seeing terrible problems
> with XMMS since the early 2.6 pre- kernels.
> 
> Because it only happens in XMMS I thought it was one of those
> application bugs brought out by scheduler changes. I now use Zinf BTW
> -It's better for large music collections (although not as stable or
> flash).
> 
> I guess someone ought to revert the standard behaviour.

OK, the following patch from Andrew fixes it up 80% or so, but I still 
don't think it's as good as test2 was - turning on whole-frag seems to
fix the rest of it. It's much more difficult to tell now though, so I'd 
like other people's opinions on it. If you want to switch between the
two, the above switches it on, and:

# echo 'clear' > /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss

switches whole-frag back off. I'm using a 192kbps MP3 to test it, repeating
the first 30s of the same song again and again (I'm gonna hate that song 
soon ;-)). Different bitrates might give better differentation of the problem.

Please, please experiment with this, and let us know.

M.

--- compile/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c.old	Mon Nov 17 18:29:43 2003
+++ compile/sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c	Sat Dec 27 10:32:30 2003
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@
 			xfer += tmp;
 			if (substream->oss.setup == NULL || !substream->oss.setup->wholefrag ||
 			    runtime->oss.buffer_used == runtime->oss.period_bytes) {
-				tmp = snd_pcm_oss_write2(substream, runtime->oss.buffer, runtime->oss.buffer_used, 1);
+				tmp = snd_pcm_oss_write2(substream, runtime->oss.buffer, runtime->oss.period_bytes, 1);
 				if (tmp <= 0)
 					return xfer > 0 ? (snd_pcm_sframes_t)xfer : tmp;
 				runtime->oss.bytes += tmp;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-27 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-26 21:55 2.6.0 sound output - wierd effects Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-26 22:27 ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2003-12-27 16:14   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-26 22:52 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-26 23:00   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-26 23:17     ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-26 23:24       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-26 23:50         ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-26 23:59           ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-27  0:44             ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27  0:53             ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27  4:34               ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-27 11:12                 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27 16:17                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-27  4:48             ` Stan Bubrouski
2003-12-27  4:57               ` Rob Love
2003-12-27  5:02                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-27  5:10                   ` Rob Love
2003-12-27  5:45                     ` Stan Bubrouski
2003-12-27 22:44                     ` szonyi calin
2003-12-27  7:50               ` OSS sound emulation broken between 2.6.0-test2 and test3 Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-27 11:11                 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27 11:44                   ` Edward Tandi
2003-12-27 12:24                     ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27 13:08                       ` Edward Tandi
2003-12-27 14:33                         ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27 16:55                           ` Edward Tandi
2003-12-27 17:22                             ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27 21:56                             ` Henrik Storner
2003-12-27 22:51                               ` Edward Tandi
2003-12-27 18:35                     ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-12-27 19:56                       ` Jaroslav Kysela
2003-12-27 20:12                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-27 20:25                       ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-27 20:44                         ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-28  0:27                           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-01-03  0:53                     ` Chris Shafer
2004-01-03 22:23                       ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-28  5:06                 ` Joshua Schmidlkofer
2003-12-26 22:59 ` 2.6.0 sound output - wierd effects Sander Sweers
2003-12-26 23:02   ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='1960000.1072550125@[10.10.2.4]' \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
    --cc=ed@efix.biz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@suse.cz \
    --cc=rml@ximian.com \
    --cc=stan@ccs.neu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®