From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@redhat.com>,
"John B. Wyatt IV" <sageofredondo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 7/7] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:48:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1976fcd8034c1a1dc06fdd10e09b7df5ed4037ac.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55c5b273-7b68-4636-824e-ddd5ee757f87@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2025-11-19 at 15:43 -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/13/25 3:33 AM, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> >
> > +static int __tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask(struct cpumask
> > *exclude_cpumask)
> > +{
> > + struct work_struct __percpu *works __free(free_percpu) =
> > + alloc_percpu(struct work_struct);
> > + cpumask_var_t cpumask_unisol __free(free_cpumask_var) =
> > CPUMASK_VAR_NULL;
> > + cpumask_var_t cpumask_isol __free(free_cpumask_var) =
> > CPUMASK_VAR_NULL;
> > + int cpu;
>
> There are currently only 2 callers for this function - from late_init
> call and from cpuset. Concurrent call is not possible. Maybe we can just
> pre-allocate these cpumask_var_t and percpu work structures once and
> reuse it instead of doing an allocation and free each time it is called.
> The pre-allocation can be done in tmigr_init_isolation().
>
I have no strong opinion on this, but after changes suggested by Thomas it gets
superfluous to allocate 2 cpumasks (after flushing what is now cpumask_unisol
it's no longer needed and we can re-use it).
Considering this only runs at boot and every time a cpuset changes isolation, is
it worth the extra steps to pre-allocate?
> >
> > +/**
> > + * tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask - Exclude given CPUs from hierarchy
> > + * @exclude_cpumask: the cpumask to be excluded from timer migration
> > hierarchy
> > + *
> > + * This function can be called from cpuset code to provide the new set of
> > + * isolated CPUs that should be excluded from the hierarchy.
> > + * Online CPUs not present in exclude_cpumask but already excluded are
> > brought
> > + * back to the hierarchy.
> > + * Functions to isolate/unisolate need to be called locally and can sleep.
> > + */
> > +int tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask(struct cpumask *exclude_cpumask)
> > +{
> > + lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> > + return __tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask(exclude_cpumask);
> > +}
> >
>
> Should we put all these functions under "#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) &&
> defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)" like in the timer.h header file?
I think that's implied in the build condition of timer_migration.o
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.8/source/kernel/time/Makefile#L27
At least I got these ifdefs from timer_migration.h and none of those functions
are ifdeffed in timer_migration.c
Thanks,
Gabriele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 8:33 [PATCH v15 0/7] " Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-13 8:33 ` [PATCH v15 1/7] timers: Rename tmigr 'online' bit to 'available' Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-19 15:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-13 8:33 ` [PATCH v15 2/7] timers: Add the available mask in timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-19 15:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-13 8:33 ` [PATCH v15 3/7] timers: Use scoped_guard when setting/clearing the tmigr available flag Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-19 15:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-13 8:33 ` [PATCH v15 4/7] cgroup/cpuset: Rename update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask() to update_isolation_cpumasks() Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-13 8:33 ` [PATCH v15 5/7] sched/isolation: Force housekeeping if isolcpus and nohz_full don't leave any Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-13 8:33 ` [PATCH v15 6/7] cpumask: Add initialiser to use cleanup helpers Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-13 8:33 ` [PATCH v15 7/7] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-19 16:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-19 17:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-19 18:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-19 20:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-19 21:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-19 22:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-19 22:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-19 22:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-19 20:43 ` Waiman Long
2025-11-20 10:48 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2025-11-20 21:04 ` Waiman Long
2025-11-13 13:12 ` [PATCH v15 0/7] " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-18 10:01 ` Gabriele Monaco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1976fcd8034c1a1dc06fdd10e09b7df5ed4037ac.camel@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jwyatt@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=sageofredondo@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®