From: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com>,
"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"DRI mailing list" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tino Keitel" <tino.keitel@tikei.de>,
stable@kernel.org, indan@nul.nu, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix backlight brightness on intel LVDS panel after reopening lid
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:50:09 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a06e2711df021a802d609ad1a75db17.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimyQ30ELw9Sm57NXgetiXnzJMHby2BE3GsynJLs@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
> one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
>
> Linus
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu> wrote:
>>
>> So please revert my patch and apply Takashi Iwai's, which fixes the
>> most immediate bug without changing anything else. This should go
>> in stable too.
>
I found another backlight bug:
When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is called at resume. With the
effect that if the brightness was ever changed after screen
blanking, the wrong brightness gets restored.
This explains the weird behaviour I've seen. I didn't see it with
combination mode, because then the brightness is always the same
(zero or the maximum, the BIOS only uses LBPC on my system.) I'll
send a patch in a moment.
Alternative for reverting the combination mode removal (I can also
redo the patch against the revert and Takashi's patch, if that's
preferred):
--
drm/i915: Do handle backlight combination mode specially
Add back the combination mode check, but with slightly cleaner code
and the weirdness removed: No val >>= 1, but also no val &= ~1. The
old code probably confused bit 0 with BLM_LEGACY_MODE, which is bit 16.
The other change is clearer calculations: Just check for zero level
explicitly instead of avoiding the divide-by-zero.
Signed-off-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index d860abe..b05631a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
#include "intel_drv.h"
+#define PCI_LBPC 0xf4 /* legacy/combination backlight modes */
+#define BLM_COMBINATION_MODE (1 << 30)
+#define BLM_LEGACY_MODE (1 << 16)
+
void
intel_fixed_panel_mode(struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode,
struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
@@ -110,6 +114,22 @@ done:
dev_priv->pch_pf_size = (width << 16) | height;
}
+/*
+ * What about gen 3? If there are no gen 3 systems with ASLE,
+ * then it doesn't matter, as we don't need to change the
+ * brightness. But then the gen 2 check can be removed too.
+ */
+static int is_backlight_combination_mode(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4)
+ return I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL2) & BLM_COMBINATION_MODE;
+ if (IS_GEN2(dev))
+ return I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL) & BLM_LEGACY_MODE;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static u32 i915_read_blc_pwm_ctl(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
u32 val;
@@ -163,9 +183,12 @@ u32 intel_panel_get_max_backlight(struct drm_device *dev)
max >>= 17;
} else {
max >>= 16;
+ /* Ignore BLM_LEGACY_MODE bit */
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
max &= ~1;
}
+ if (is_backlight_combination_mode(dev))
+ max *= 0xff;
}
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("max backlight PWM = %d\n", max);
@@ -183,6 +206,12 @@ u32 intel_panel_get_backlight(struct drm_device *dev)
val = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL) & BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK;
if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev))
val >>= 1;
+ if (is_backlight_combination_mode(dev)){
+ u8 lbpc;
+
+ pci_read_config_byte(dev->pdev, PCI_LBPC, &lbpc);
+ val *= lbpc;
+ }
}
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("get backlight PWM = %d\n", val);
@@ -205,6 +234,15 @@ void intel_panel_set_backlight(struct drm_device *dev, u32 level)
if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
return intel_pch_panel_set_backlight(dev, level);
+
+ if (level && is_backlight_combination_mode(dev)){
+ u32 max = intel_panel_get_max_backlight(dev);
+ u8 lpbc;
+
+ lpbc = level * 0xff / max;
+ level /= lpbc;
+ pci_write_config_byte(dev->pdev, PCI_LBPC, lpbc);
+ }
tmp = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL);
if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev)) {
tmp &= ~(BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK - 1);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 4:16 Linux 2.6.38-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 11:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 13:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 15:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 16:06 ` Al Viro
2011-02-16 16:19 ` Al Viro
2011-02-16 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 16:39 ` Al Viro
2011-02-16 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 19:26 ` [PATCH] fix backlight brightness on intel LVDS panel after reopening lid Alex Riesen
2011-02-16 19:46 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-16 19:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-16 19:59 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-16 20:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-16 20:28 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-17 1:41 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not handle backlight combination mode specially Indan Zupancic
2011-02-17 22:13 ` [PATCH] fix backlight brightness on intel LVDS panel after reopening lid Tino Keitel
2011-02-18 4:57 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-19 12:11 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-19 12:26 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-19 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-22 21:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-22 22:31 ` Tino Keitel
2011-02-23 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-04 6:53 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-04 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-04 23:32 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-06 17:40 ` Alex Riesen
2011-03-10 5:50 ` Indan Zupancic [this message]
2011-03-10 6:00 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-10 7:49 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 8:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 10:06 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-10 12:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 13:02 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Revive combination mode for backlight control Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 19:36 ` Keith Packard
2011-03-11 1:30 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-11 1:23 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-11 1:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-11 7:26 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-11 9:08 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-11 7:34 ` Keith Packard
2011-03-10 8:45 ` [PATCH] fix backlight brightness on intel LVDS panel after reopening lid Indan Zupancic
2011-03-10 12:51 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-05 0:26 ` Peter Stuge
2011-02-23 1:32 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-20 14:03 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc5 Paul Rolland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a06e2711df021a802d609ad1a75db17.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl \
--to=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tino.keitel@tikei.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome